Look at all the pretty windmills....

[SSDD]

And this is beautiful to you. LOL

That's not a coal mine, so what does it have to do with fossil fuels?

You dumb ass, that is a mountain top removal coal mine. God, but you are stupid.

prove it.

It is a coal mine in west virginia...lots of people work there to support their families and lots of people use the electricity from the power plants powered by the coal.

There's no reference, so how would anyone know what it is?[/QUOTE]

[/QUOTE]

This is where he got the picture.. Mountain near Rawl, West Virginia

Naturally, the people posting there would like to see the operation shut down and all the people who work there unemployed and starving...guess none of them realize that they may be using electricity provided by the coal mined at this location. Liberals aren't able to think to the logical end of their pie in the sky pipe dreams...

 

[bodecea]

Sitting idle because the wind is blowing too hard! This is west of Amarillo at 9:54 Veterans Day 2019.

Good News

Windmills cause cancer

Actually, according to the orange "Chosen One", it's the sound of windmills that causes cancer.

 

[bodecea]

Here are some windmills offshore from Trumps Scottish golf course

Boy, was he pissed!


View attachment 292229

I would be too. They are ugly as sin, and destroy the beautiful views of the landscape.

These are absolutely gorgeous....

 

[westwall]

Here are some windmills offshore from Trumps Scottish golf course

Boy, was he pissed!


View attachment 292229

I would be too. They are ugly as sin, and destroy the beautiful views of the landscape.

These are absolutely gorgeous....View attachment 292624 View attachment 292625

Wow, look at all that water vapor. You do know that that is what is coming out of those stacks? Right? Or are you another dumb head who doesn't.....

 

[bodecea]

Here are some windmills offshore from Trumps Scottish golf course

Boy, was he pissed!


View attachment 292229

I would be too. They are ugly as sin, and destroy the beautiful views of the landscape.

And this is beautiful to you. LOL

Look at it from ground level and tell me what you see

Oh....ground level. Makes ALLLLLLLL the difference.

 

[bodecea]

Here are some windmills offshore from Trumps Scottish golf course

Boy, was he pissed!


View attachment 292229

I would be too. They are ugly as sin, and destroy the beautiful views of the landscape.

And this is beautiful to you. LOL

True...wind and solar projects are an eye sore from the ground and the air.

Not at all. In fact around here.....they are using the roofs of car ports for solar....totally makes sense....and then also windmills in high wind areas like the pass to Palm Springs.

 

[bodecea]

Here are some windmills offshore from Trumps Scottish golf course

Boy, was he pissed!


View attachment 292229

I would be too. They are ugly as sin, and destroy the beautiful views of the landscape.

These are absolutely gorgeous....View attachment 292624 View attachment 292625

Wow, look at all that water vapor. You do know that that is what is coming out of those stacks? Right? Or are you another dumb head who doesn't.....

Ruh Roooooh! Burning coal creates water vapor.........

 

[bripat9643]

Here are some windmills offshore from Trumps Scottish golf course

Boy, was he pissed!


View attachment 292229

I would be too. They are ugly as sin, and destroy the beautiful views of the landscape.

And this is beautiful to you. LOL

Look at it from ground level and tell me what you see

Oh....ground level. Makes ALLLLLLLL the difference.

Would you like to ban all mining in the country?

 

[bripat9643]

Here are some windmills offshore from Trumps Scottish golf course

Boy, was he pissed!


View attachment 292229

I would be too. They are ugly as sin, and destroy the beautiful views of the landscape.

These are absolutely gorgeous....View attachment 292624 View attachment 292625

Wow, look at all that water vapor. You do know that that is what is coming out of those stacks? Right? Or are you another dumb head who doesn't.....

Ruh Roooooh! Burning coal creates water vapor.........

It certainly does, you fucking dumbass. For one thing in coal fired power plants they have scrubbers which use lots of water to clean the sulfur out of the gases going up the stack. For another, the combustion process produces water

You just made a complete fool of yourself.

 

[eagle1462010]

And this is beautiful to you. LOL

That's not a coal mine, so what does it have to do with fossil fuels?

You dumb ass, that is a mountain top removal coal mine. God, but you are stupid.

prove it.

It is a coal mine in west virginia...lots of people work there to support their families and lots of people use the electricity from the power plants powered by the coal.

There's no reference, so how would anyone know what it is?[/QUOTE]
google search the picture. lol

 

[Billy_Bob]

Here are some windmills offshore from Trumps Scottish golf course

Boy, was he pissed!


View attachment 292229

I would be too. They are ugly as sin, and destroy the beautiful views of the landscape.

These are absolutely gorgeous....View attachment 292624 View attachment 292625

Wow, look at all that water vapor. You do know that that is what is coming out of those stacks? Right? Or are you another dumb head who doesn't.....

Ruh Roooooh! Burning coal creates water vapor.........

Here are some windmills offshore from Trumps Scottish golf course

Boy, was he pissed!


View attachment 292229

I would be too. They are ugly as sin, and destroy the beautiful views of the landscape.

These are absolutely gorgeous....View attachment 292624 View attachment 292625

Wow, look at all that water vapor. You do know that that is what is coming out of those stacks? Right? Or are you another dumb head who doesn't.....

Ruh Roooooh! Burning coal creates water vapor.........

We have determined that you are an uninformed idiot...

The emissions from those stacks is 99.9% water vapor as the scrubbing technologies used to clean the exhaust remove over 99.999% of all particulate matter. IT is indeed water vapor and a little CO (Carbon Monoxide)... nothing more..

 

[Kilroy2]

So looking at coal mind plant it is more aesthetically pleasing that looking at a windmills

power line are aesthetically pleasing when looking at the environment
telephone lines are aesthetically pleasing
Cell phone towers are aesthetically pleasing

anyway beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Everybody goes to NY or Tokyo for the big buildings and lights

The real story is Coal-fired power plants are the largest source for atmospheric CO2 concentrations (easily bypassing vehicles) and readings have shown then reaching 400 parts per million which is setting new records in the history of man. Pre industrial times numbers are about 280 ppm. So obviously coal fired plants are a problem.

Severe storms and outages cost billions of dollars. Climate change cost the economy billions of dollars.

The aesthetically pleasing land after a storm vs windmills. personally I find wind mills farms and solar farms aesthetically pleasing because they do not cause CO2 pollution and even though they are man made, they do coexist with nature and use the wind and solar power uses the Sun

The new green deal is a little ambitious but the just need to slow their roll a little bit and in time it will be the standard

Coal for energy will slowly die as it has for coal being used in
grilling

but hey there are a few old timers still using coal in the grill

Still as infrastructure and homes are destroyed and have to be rebuilt that is the real cost for using coal

The climate disrupts electrical grids and they have to be rebuilt and PR is a prime example of how many were without power for an extended amount of time

.

 

[Kilroy2]

Here are some windmills offshore from Trumps Scottish golf course

Boy, was he pissed!


View attachment 292229

I would be too. They are ugly as sin, and destroy the beautiful views of the landscape.

These are absolutely gorgeous....View attachment 292624 View attachment 292625

Wow, look at all that water vapor. You do know that that is what is coming out of those stacks? Right? Or are you another dumb head who doesn't.....

Ruh Roooooh! Burning coal creates water vapor.........

Some are missing the point about coal factory emissions

 

[westwall]

So looking at coal mind plant it is more aesthetically pleasing that looking at a windmills

power line are aesthetically pleasing when looking at the environment
telephone lines are aesthetically pleasing
Cell phone towers are aesthetically pleasing

anyway beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Everybody goes to NY or Tokyo for the big buildings and lights

The real story is Coal-fired power plants are the largest source for atmospheric CO2 concentrations (easily bypassing vehicles) and readings have shown then reaching 400 parts per million which is setting new records in the history of man. Pre industrial times numbers are about 280 ppm. So obviously coal fired plants are a problem.

Severe storms and outages cost billions of dollars. Climate change cost the economy billions of dollars.

The aesthetically pleasing land after a storm vs windmills. personally I find wind mills farms and solar farms aesthetically pleasing because they do not cause CO2 pollution and even though they are man made, they do coexist with nature and use the wind and solar power uses the Sun

The new green deal is a little ambitious but the just need to slow their roll a little bit and in time it will be the standard

Coal for energy will slowly die as it has for coal being used in
grilling

but hey there are a few old timers still using coal in the grill

Still as infrastructure and homes are destroyed and have to be rebuilt that is the real cost for using coal

The climate disrupts electrical grids and they have to be rebuilt and PR is a prime example of how many were without power for an extended amount of time

.

Yes, the footprint for both the mine, and the coal fired powerplant are much less. Coal plants here in the US are relatively clean, just as an FYI.

And you think this looks good?

Really?

 

[bripat9643]

So looking at coal mind plant it is more aesthetically pleasing that looking at a windmills

power line are aesthetically pleasing when looking at the environment
telephone lines are aesthetically pleasing
Cell phone towers are aesthetically pleasing

anyway beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Everybody goes to NY or Tokyo for the big buildings and lights

The real story is Coal-fired power plants are the largest source for atmospheric CO2 concentrations (easily bypassing vehicles) and readings have shown then reaching 400 parts per million which is setting new records in the history of man. Pre industrial times numbers are about 280 ppm. So obviously coal fired plants are a problem.

Severe storms and outages cost billions of dollars. Climate change cost the economy billions of dollars.

The aesthetically pleasing land after a storm vs windmills. personally I find wind mills farms and solar farms aesthetically pleasing because they do not cause CO2 pollution and even though they are man made, they do coexist with nature and use the wind and solar power uses the Sun

The new green deal is a little ambitious but the just need to slow their roll a little bit and in time it will be the standard

Coal for energy will slowly die as it has for coal being used in
grilling

but hey there are a few old timers still using coal in the grill

Still as infrastructure and homes are destroyed and have to be rebuilt that is the real cost for using coal

The climate disrupts electrical grids and they have to be rebuilt and PR is a prime example of how many were without power for an extended amount of time

.

No, it isn't obvious that coal fired power plants are a problem. When did anyone prove that the current concentration of CO2 is harmful? Plenty of biologists says its beneficial.

Does "coexisting with nature" mean killing millions of birds every year? Almost everything enviro-wackos claim is utter horseshit.

 

[Kilroy2]

So looking at coal mind plant it is more aesthetically pleasing that looking at a windmills

power line are aesthetically pleasing when looking at the environment
telephone lines are aesthetically pleasing
Cell phone towers are aesthetically pleasing

anyway beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Everybody goes to NY or Tokyo for the big buildings and lights

The real story is Coal-fired power plants are the largest source for atmospheric CO2 concentrations (easily bypassing vehicles) and readings have shown then reaching 400 parts per million which is setting new records in the history of man. Pre industrial times numbers are about 280 ppm. So obviously coal fired plants are a problem.

Severe storms and outages cost billions of dollars. Climate change cost the economy billions of dollars.

The aesthetically pleasing land after a storm vs windmills. personally I find wind mills farms and solar farms aesthetically pleasing because they do not cause CO2 pollution and even though they are man made, they do coexist with nature and use the wind and solar power uses the Sun

The new green deal is a little ambitious but the just need to slow their roll a little bit and in time it will be the standard

Coal for energy will slowly die as it has for coal being used in
grilling

but hey there are a few old timers still using coal in the grill

Still as infrastructure and homes are destroyed and have to be rebuilt that is the real cost for using coal

The climate disrupts electrical grids and they have to be rebuilt and PR is a prime example of how many were without power for an extended amount of time

.

No, it isn't obvious that coal fired power plants are a problem. When did anyone prove that the current concentration of CO2 is harmful? Plenty of biologists says its beneficial.

Does "coexisting with nature" mean killing millions of birds every year? Almost everything enviro-wackos claim is utter horseshit.

CO2 exisit in the air but too much is the issue and not that there is already some
plenty of biologists say its beneficial well the issue is still to much
as birds are killed by using C02 in high concentrations. Yeah its beneficial to the people who want a quick and easy way to kill birds but the issues will be the amount of CO2 in the air.

Oh so when you fly in a plane and bird do stop flying and demand that all planes stop flying because planes kill birds

when you drive your car and a bird hits your windshield does that mean you will no longer drive

People hunt birds for sport, its not because they are hungry

 

[bripat9643]

So looking at coal mind plant it is more aesthetically pleasing that looking at a windmills

power line are aesthetically pleasing when looking at the environment
telephone lines are aesthetically pleasing
Cell phone towers are aesthetically pleasing

anyway beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Everybody goes to NY or Tokyo for the big buildings and lights

The real story is Coal-fired power plants are the largest source for atmospheric CO2 concentrations (easily bypassing vehicles) and readings have shown then reaching 400 parts per million which is setting new records in the history of man. Pre industrial times numbers are about 280 ppm. So obviously coal fired plants are a problem.

Severe storms and outages cost billions of dollars. Climate change cost the economy billions of dollars.

The aesthetically pleasing land after a storm vs windmills. personally I find wind mills farms and solar farms aesthetically pleasing because they do not cause CO2 pollution and even though they are man made, they do coexist with nature and use the wind and solar power uses the Sun

The new green deal is a little ambitious but the just need to slow their roll a little bit and in time it will be the standard

Coal for energy will slowly die as it has for coal being used in
grilling

but hey there are a few old timers still using coal in the grill

Still as infrastructure and homes are destroyed and have to be rebuilt that is the real cost for using coal

The climate disrupts electrical grids and they have to be rebuilt and PR is a prime example of how many were without power for an extended amount of time

.

No, it isn't obvious that coal fired power plants are a problem. When did anyone prove that the current concentration of CO2 is harmful? Plenty of biologists says its beneficial.

Does "coexisting with nature" mean killing millions of birds every year? Almost everything enviro-wackos claim is utter horseshit.

CO2 exisit in the air but too much is the issue and not that there is already some
plenty of biologists say its beneficial well the issue is still to much
as birds are killed by using C02 in high concentrations. Yeah its beneficial to the people who want a quick and easy way to kill birds but the issues will be the amount of CO2 in the air.

Oh so when you fly in a plane and bird do stop flying and demand that all planes stop flying because planes kill birds

when you drive your car and a bird hits your windshield does that mean you will no longer drive

People hunt birds for sport, its not because they are hungry

It takes about 50,000 PPM to kill birds, dumbass, not 400 PPM.

Planes provide mankind with enormous benefits. So-called "green energy" only sucks money out of our economy.

 

[Kilroy2]

So looking at coal mind plant it is more aesthetically pleasing that looking at a windmills

power line are aesthetically pleasing when looking at the environment
telephone lines are aesthetically pleasing
Cell phone towers are aesthetically pleasing

anyway beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Everybody goes to NY or Tokyo for the big buildings and lights

The real story is Coal-fired power plants are the largest source for atmospheric CO2 concentrations (easily bypassing vehicles) and readings have shown then reaching 400 parts per million which is setting new records in the history of man. Pre industrial times numbers are about 280 ppm. So obviously coal fired plants are a problem.

Severe storms and outages cost billions of dollars. Climate change cost the economy billions of dollars.

The aesthetically pleasing land after a storm vs windmills. personally I find wind mills farms and solar farms aesthetically pleasing because they do not cause CO2 pollution and even though they are man made, they do coexist with nature and use the wind and solar power uses the Sun

The new green deal is a little ambitious but the just need to slow their roll a little bit and in time it will be the standard

Coal for energy will slowly die as it has for coal being used in
grilling

but hey there are a few old timers still using coal in the grill

Still as infrastructure and homes are destroyed and have to be rebuilt that is the real cost for using coal

The climate disrupts electrical grids and they have to be rebuilt and PR is a prime example of how many were without power for an extended amount of time

.

Yes, the footprint for both the mine, and the coal fired powerplant are much less. Coal plants here in the US are relatively clean, just as an FYI.

And you think this looks good?

Really?

Its vacant land and not being used. Sure in some areas where there are trees that some trees are cut down but hey trees are cut for lumber all the time

well my turn do you think coal burning plants look good and all those high power electrical lines

still why are those chimneys so high is it because the venting is beneficial

 

[Kilroy2]

So looking at coal mind plant it is more aesthetically pleasing that looking at a windmills

power line are aesthetically pleasing when looking at the environment
telephone lines are aesthetically pleasing
Cell phone towers are aesthetically pleasing

anyway beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Everybody goes to NY or Tokyo for the big buildings and lights

The real story is Coal-fired power plants are the largest source for atmospheric CO2 concentrations (easily bypassing vehicles) and readings have shown then reaching 400 parts per million which is setting new records in the history of man. Pre industrial times numbers are about 280 ppm. So obviously coal fired plants are a problem.

Severe storms and outages cost billions of dollars. Climate change cost the economy billions of dollars.

The aesthetically pleasing land after a storm vs windmills. personally I find wind mills farms and solar farms aesthetically pleasing because they do not cause CO2 pollution and even though they are man made, they do coexist with nature and use the wind and solar power uses the Sun

The new green deal is a little ambitious but the just need to slow their roll a little bit and in time it will be the standard

Coal for energy will slowly die as it has for coal being used in
grilling

but hey there are a few old timers still using coal in the grill

Still as infrastructure and homes are destroyed and have to be rebuilt that is the real cost for using coal

The climate disrupts electrical grids and they have to be rebuilt and PR is a prime example of how many were without power for an extended amount of time

.

No, it isn't obvious that coal fired power plants are a problem. When did anyone prove that the current concentration of CO2 is harmful? Plenty of biologists says its beneficial.

Does "coexisting with nature" mean killing millions of birds every year? Almost everything enviro-wackos claim is utter horseshit.

CO2 exisit in the air but too much is the issue and not that there is already some
plenty of biologists say its beneficial well the issue is still to much
as birds are killed by using C02 in high concentrations. Yeah its beneficial to the people who want a quick and easy way to kill birds but the issues will be the amount of CO2 in the air.

Oh so when you fly in a plane and bird do stop flying and demand that all planes stop flying because planes kill birds

when you drive your car and a bird hits your windshield does that mean you will no longer drive

People hunt birds for sport, its not because they are hungry

It takes about 50,000 PPM to kill birds, dumbass, not 400 PPM.

Planes provide mankind with enormous benefits. So-called "green energy" only sucks money out of our economy.

well it still kills

Windmills prove mankind benefits as a clean renewable energy and does not cause environmental concerns. As you say its about the amount of CO2 and the amount of CO2 being pumped into the atmosphere is well documented.

 

[bripat9643]

So looking at coal mind plant it is more aesthetically pleasing that looking at a windmills

power line are aesthetically pleasing when looking at the environment
telephone lines are aesthetically pleasing
Cell phone towers are aesthetically pleasing

anyway beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Everybody goes to NY or Tokyo for the big buildings and lights

The real story is Coal-fired power plants are the largest source for atmospheric CO2 concentrations (easily bypassing vehicles) and readings have shown then reaching 400 parts per million which is setting new records in the history of man. Pre industrial times numbers are about 280 ppm. So obviously coal fired plants are a problem.

Severe storms and outages cost billions of dollars. Climate change cost the economy billions of dollars.

The aesthetically pleasing land after a storm vs windmills. personally I find wind mills farms and solar farms aesthetically pleasing because they do not cause CO2 pollution and even though they are man made, they do coexist with nature and use the wind and solar power uses the Sun

The new green deal is a little ambitious but the just need to slow their roll a little bit and in time it will be the standard

Coal for energy will slowly die as it has for coal being used in
grilling

but hey there are a few old timers still using coal in the grill

Still as infrastructure and homes are destroyed and have to be rebuilt that is the real cost for using coal

The climate disrupts electrical grids and they have to be rebuilt and PR is a prime example of how many were without power for an extended amount of time

.

No, it isn't obvious that coal fired power plants are a problem. When did anyone prove that the current concentration of CO2 is harmful? Plenty of biologists says its beneficial.

Does "coexisting with nature" mean killing millions of birds every year? Almost everything enviro-wackos claim is utter horseshit.

CO2 exisit in the air but too much is the issue and not that there is already some
plenty of biologists say its beneficial well the issue is still to much
as birds are killed by using C02 in high concentrations. Yeah its beneficial to the people who want a quick and easy way to kill birds but the issues will be the amount of CO2 in the air.

Oh so when you fly in a plane and bird do stop flying and demand that all planes stop flying because planes kill birds

when you drive your car and a bird hits your windshield does that mean you will no longer drive

People hunt birds for sport, its not because they are hungry

It takes about 50,000 PPM to kill birds, dumbass, not 400 PPM.

Planes provide mankind with enormous benefits. So-called "green energy" only sucks money out of our economy.

well it still kills

Windmills prove mankind benefits as a clean renewable energy and does not cause environmental concerns. As you say its about the amount of CO2 and the amount of CO2 being pumped into the atmosphere is well documented.

They sure as hell do cause environmental concerns. The kill millions of birds every year. Didn't you read my previous post? They also have to build power lines all over creation to get the power to where it's consumed. Wind power requires 100% backup, which means you still have to have plenty of fossil fueled power plants available. Your net gain for building wind power is pretty close to zero, and it's negative when you figure all the additional money you're spending.

Global warming is a con.