LOL - "Creation Science" - LOL

Status
Not open for further replies.
Haha, knock yourself out. You can start by failing a 6th grade science quiz. Then get mad at the teacher.

No need to be able to pass a science quiz to know man wasn't there in the beginning.

You can't prove anything with SCIENCE. You have to have faith (same as me ) to believe what you believe.
 
No need to be able to pass a science quiz to know man wasn't there in the beginning.
Uh right, because scientists taught you he wasn't.
You can't prove anything with SCIENCE.
As whined on his quantum mechanical device...

You are in over your head, fruitcake. Back to the religion section you go.
 
Your posts are frivolous Sh**.
No substance whatsoever.
You're a Clown.
100% Troll with zero content.
zero.

Don't be mad you can't prove what you believe.

Nothing wrong with having faith in something.
 
I'm in the right place.

Science and Religion go hand in hand.
Well that's your dumbest comment yet.

Because religion and ANYTHING can go "hand in hand". Because religion is undefined, magical nonsense that can be sprinkled on any idea to absolutely no effect whatsoever, when desired.

*squawk*

GOD'S PLAN!

"*squawk*
 
Your posts are frivolous Sh**.
No substance whatsoever.
You're a Clown.
100% Troll with zero content.
zero.
LOL

Sorry, didn't mean to upset you. Maybe you could learn to deal with the fact Science only goes so far and has limitations.
 
Well that's your dumbest comment yet.

Because religion and ANYTHING can go "hand in hand". Because religion is undefined, magical nonsense that can be sprinkled on any idea to absolutely no effect whatsoever, when desired.

*squawk*

GOD'S PLAN!

"*squawk*

Same with Science.

Trillions of years ago.......*squawk*
 
Trillions of years ago.......*squawk*
With a few, somewhat important differences:

- all the evidence vs. zero evidence (what you possess)

- Actually explains things and yields accurate and useful predictions.

But yeah, other than that, no different!
 
With a few, somewhat important differences:

- all the evidence vs. zero evidence (what you possess)

- Actually explains things and yields accurate and useful predictions.

But yeah, other than that, no different!

"Science" is constantly changing.

You consider things that change accurate? How?
 
Science" is constantly changing.
No, science is a method and is quite static.

Evidence is always being updated. That is more accurate.

So far, none of it is on your side. And, as will always be true, the science enjoys 100% support of the evidence. Because that's what science is. It's built right into the method.
 
15th post
No, science is a method and is quite static.

Evidence is always being updated. That is more accurate.

So far, none of it is on your side. And, as will always be true, the science enjoys 100% support of the evidence. Because that's what science is. It's built right into the method.

See what I mean.

It's accurate, but it's always being updated. LOL
 
See what I mean.

It's accurate, but it's always being updated. LOL
Yes, that's right, that is an accurate description of the evidence. Is someone supposed to be embarrassed by that? Am I supposed to clear my desk of these useless quantum machines in one swipe, now? Are you going to run and stick a fork in an electrical outlet, now?
 
Yes, that's right, that is an accurate description of the evidence. Is someone supposed to be embarrassed by that? Am I supposed to clear my desk of these useless quantum machines in one swipe, now? Are you going to run and stick a fork in an electrical outlet, now?

Nothing at all wrong with having faith in something.

And no, I'm not going to do that with a fork. LOL
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom