lantern2814
Diamond Member
- Jul 17, 2018
- 14,250
- 11,648
- 2,140
Since you wouldn’t know a fact if bit your ignorant ass you best STFU.Who cares? Red herring. This is you trying to talk about ANYTHING but the facts,.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Since you wouldn’t know a fact if bit your ignorant ass you best STFU.Who cares? Red herring. This is you trying to talk about ANYTHING but the facts,.
I did not say you were covering for Trump IF you don’t answer the questions, I wrote that I have to assume that you don’t have an answer that can support “Normalizing” your client DJT. If you can answer the question I will review them to see if they support your effort to normalize Trump by abnormalizing the members of the Committee. The potential for bias in the committee to you it seems is evil intent / not fair to the perpetual victim of the deep state establishment but also to you ThisIsMe , DJT’s “misunderstanding” that he won the election that caused all the trouble, violence and bloodshed on Jan6 had nothing to do with DJT’s bias - DJT’s bias unto himself and his self interest and the perpetuation of the Trump political anti-establishment brand. #
If you can answer the question I will review them to see if they support your effort to normalize Trump by abnormalizing the members of the Committee.
The potential for bias in the committee to you it seems is evil intent
Bullcrap! The Eastman Plan was defined by DJT at the rally and Eastman himself riled up the crowd before DJT Spoke: 21OCT31-POST#658
Shame on you for not knowing any of this until now. I thought you were interested in acquiring the truth. I wrote this in March 21OCT31-POST#658
NFBW wrote: They were there in numbers (unarmed by law) to pressure Pence to steal it. 21MAR20-POST#301
January 6, 2021 8:17 a.m.: Trump tweets: "States want to correct their votes, which they now know were based on irregularities and fraud, plus corrupt process never received legislative approval. All Mike Pence has to do is send them back to the States, AND WE WIN. Do it Mike, this is a time for extreme courage!"
NFBW wrote: And then live to the crowd DJT reminds the mob what Pence had to do:
Because if Mike Pence does the right thing, we win the election. All he has to do, all this is, this is from the number one, or certainly one of the top, Constitutional lawyers in our country. He has the absolute right to do it. We’re supposed to protect our country, support our country, support our Constitution, and protect our constitution. - - - States want to revote. The states got defrauded, They were given false information. They voted on it. Now they want to recertify. They want it back. All Vice President Pence has to do is send it back to the states to recertify and we become president and you are the happiest people.”
djtqriot1 copied and pasted from https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2021-01-13/transcript-of-trumps-speech-at-rally-before-us-capitol-riot?context=amp
NFBW wrote: But Pence defied the President and IGNORED the angry crowd. At about 1 PM he issued this statement on his way to the Capitol
"my considered judgement that my oath to support and defend the Constitution constrains me from claiming unilateral authority to determine which electoral votes should be counted and which should not."
NFBW wrote: The brave Trumpism patriots stormed the Capitol to stop the steal themselves and hang Mike Pence as a traitor to Constitutional Trumpism
(DoD Memo) 1:26 p.m.: The Capitol Police orders the evacuation of the Capitol complex.
NFBW wrote They left their guns in Virginia but they had or found other weapons and the gallows set up to hang Mike Pence.
January 6, 2021 8:17 a.m.: Trump tweets: "States want to correct their votes, which they now know were based on irregularities and fraud, plus corrupt process never received legislative approval. All Mike Pence has to do is send them back to the States, AND WE WIN. Do it Mike, this is a time for extreme courage!"
I thought you were interested in acquiring the truth. I wrote this in March
I have stated multiple times now that if I had confidence that the Committee was not biased and actively looking to find Trump guilty, id be supportive of it.
No, she is fully aware the orange pile of shit never intended to march to the Capitol, despite telling his minions he would.Is she saying Trump planned to invade the capitol???
Here, I'll clear it up for you...I don't know the timeline, I don't know the facts of the case, I didn't watch the rally, I didn't watch the riot that followed, I havent watched the trials, I haven't watched the press events. I haven't kept up with any of that.
Funny that we don't need to find the facts we do not yet have, yet he already knows the facts.So why did you take Bannon’s side? Attack Schiff?
ThisIsMe wrote: Again, as was previously mentioned, bannon left the white house years before the capitol riot, so, why even subpoena him? Why does schiff feel the need to threaten him, for something he had no part of? 21OCT12-POST#53
According to the messages they sent to each other, they were planning an operation on 1/6. On its own, thi could just be a reference to the rally itself, but they also give order tha any who chooses to take part must not wear clothing which would identify them as Prou Boys toprotect the group. If it were supposed to be a rally, they would want to display their colors.Show me where any of those plans involved an attack on the Capital, Leviticus! The Proud Boys were planning a confrontation with Antifa.
And why would they be talking about it at all? I mean, were they discussing what cool outfits they would wear together at the rally? Oh, that's right, our good congresspeople at issue here did not even attend.According to the messages they sent to each other, they were planning an operation on 1/6. On its own, thi could just be a reference to the rally itself, but they also give order tha any who chooses to take part must not wear clothing which would identify them as Prou Boys toprotect the group. If it were supposed to be a rally, they would want to display their colors.
Then one of leaders reminds them that police officers are the primary targets because they will pose the biggest threat. Odd words for a political rally huh.
Do you seriously not grasp the difference between planning to take part in a "rally" outside of the Capitol building in which they are worried they will come into conflict with Antifa groups...and planning an assault on the Capitol building itself?According to the messages they sent to each other, they were planning an operation on 1/6. On its own, thi could just be a reference to the rally itself, but they also give order tha any who chooses to take part must not wear clothing which would identify them as Prou Boys toprotect the group. If it were supposed to be a rally, they would want to display their colors.
Then one of leaders reminds them that police officers are the primary targets because they will pose the biggest threat. Odd words for a political rally huh.
They're talking about being able identify each other in the event of a conflict, Fort. The conflict they appear to be most concerned about would be with Antifa groups.And why would they be talking about it at all? I mean, were they discussing what cool outfits they would wear together at the rally? Oh, that's right, our good congresspeople at issue here did not even attend.
But he is not being honest or rational.
#becauseitsacultAnd there is the irony. All of them ROOTED for this to succeed. Every one of them watched it live on TV and rooted and cheered for the insurrectionists.
But they perceive a slight bit of trouble for the high priest of the cult. So they go into human shield mode, reflexively, and oddly try to cover for and dismiss actions they supported and still support 100%
The grip Trump has on their brains is remarkable.
They're talking about being able identify each other in the event of a conflict, Fort.
That is not a fact. They knew what the plan was and they knew the vice president wasn't going along with it which is why some were chanting, "hang Mike Pence," as they broke into the Capitol.In fact, the people at the rally, nor ANYONE had any idea that there was even a plan to try and reject electors. I don't recall that ever being mentioned until the book came out.
The problem with your dilemma Is that the opposition Party is the most diverse multicultural Political Party. The diverse party is made up of people top to bottom that Trump has trashed for six years. So also top to bottom they justifiably hate him. His Party is made up essentially of one culture - the white Christian and wealthy corporate and business class culture and they could care less what he does to the opposition and against the Constitution. His party will never agree to investigate him as it exists so the only way we have a Congressional investigation is if the opposition party holds a majority in the House and a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. So what you want is impossible unless the Republicans decide to put country over party. That ain’t happening.
The problem with your dilemma Is that the opposition Party is the most diverse multicultural Political Party
The diverse party is made up of people top to bottom that Trump has trashed for six years.
So also top to bottom they justifiably hate him
His Party is made up essentially of one culture - the white Christian and wealthy corporate and business class culture and they could care less what he does to the opposition and against the Constitution.
His party will never agree to investigate him as it exists so the only way we have a Congressional investigation is if the opposition party holds a majority in the House and a filibuster proof majority in the Senate.
So what you want is impossible unless the Republicans decide to put country over party. That ain’t happening.
I hadn't realized that Bannon had re inserted himself back into the fray. I believe my post cleared all that up.So why did you take Bannon’s side? Attack Schiff?
ThisIsMe wrote: Again, as was previously mentioned, bannon left the white house years before the capitol riot, so, why even subpoena him? Why does schiff feel the need to threaten him, for something he had no part of? 21OCT12-POST#53
Trump's involvement in the planning is about as surprising as sunrise.Trump ‘appears to have been personally involved in planning’ Jan 6 riot, says Cheney
Bannon ‘appears’ to have had ‘substantial advance knowledge of the plans for January 6th’www.independent.co.uk
She doesnt really provide a silver bullet in this statement but it really does look like that is the case. Bannon has an obligation to Trump and it is the logical conclusion.
I think that it might be alike that scene in A Few Good Men where Trump would want to scream at America.
"You cant handle the truth. SAD",
On a positive note it does appear that Liz and her friends have bollocks big enough to deal with this.