ThisIsMe wrote: My question wasn't whether or not having the investigation was right or wrong, but if they couldn't find the evidence to prove Trump was guilty of planning and ordering the attack on the capitol, would they be able to admit it, and admit they were wrong about their accusations of trump. 21OCT30-POST#602
NFBW wrote: Your question is based on the false premise that the formation of the committee and the structure of it and the people in it is potentially wrong. It cannot be wrong. The members on the committee are gathering information, they have made no charges against DJT or any of his people other than Bannon, so far, who refuses to comply with the subpoena so they can gather information. - - - You wrote,
“if they couldn't find the evidence to prove Trump was guilty of planning and ordering the attack on the capitol,” which is “if” for the reason that the committee members don’t have the information when they joined the committee to start looking for it. So if none turns up in the course of the investigation why in the hell do they have to say they were wrong to look for information. Your absurd method of questioning leaves only one solution that I can see, and that is to not have an investigation. At least do not have one question until you, a DJT voter approves the set up of the people that would be doing the investigation. And you should know by now that if Qanon, Roger Stone Alex Jones and Ivanka Trump formed a committee and finishing up an investigation and found that DJT didn’t pay a parking ticket DJT would call it a witchhunt. He’s built that way. He is what he is because that is the way that he is. So if you want to go through with your repetitive attack on the committee In order to protect DJ T then I will continue to explain why you are wrong and you should not be doing it. That’s all for now. gonna watch the buckeyes beat Penn State. 21OCT30-POST#610
Your question is based on the false premise that the formation of the committee and the structure of it and the people in it is potentially wrong. It cannot be wrong
No, that's not it at all. I never said anything about the formation of the committee being wrong. I never even mentioned that, anywhere. I said that if they couldn't find the evidence to conclusively show trumps wrongdoing, would they admit they were wrong about their accusations that Trump was guilty of planning a riot.
The members on the committee are gathering information,
Correct, and there are 3 types of information, information that can allege guilt and information that can allege innocence, and then there is information that can be twisted to appear to be something its not. I have been saying I think the committee will bury any information that alleges innocence and promote the evidence that alleges guilt and twist context.
they have made no charges against DJT or any of his people
Yes they have, maybe not officially as a committee, but they all have spoken against Trump, and their assertion that they think he is guilty.
Let's put it like this, if you were accused of a crime, would you want the team charged with that investigation to be people who hated you and WANTED to see you go to prison? Would that be the investigation team investigation you?
So if none turns up in the course of the investigation why in the hell do they have to say they were wrong to look for information.
They have all accused Trump of crimes, maybe not as a formal committee, but separately, they, and nearly every Democrat has accused Trump of being the leader and planner of the riot, they have launched and investigation because of it. They even impeached him for it. So yes, if this investigation came out with no evidence of criminal wrongdoing, and any evidence that Trump had a part in planning and directing the riot, they need to come out and tell people that, and admit they were wrong about their accusations.
This begs the question, they already impeached him for this, why are they investigating it AGAIN, the answer to that is because they couldn't get a guilty verdict from the impeachment to stop Trump from running for office, so they are doing their own investigation to achieve just that. So yes, they have incentive to make sure he is found guilty, by any means necessary.
Your absurd method of questioning leaves only one solution that I can see, and that is to not have an investigation
I never said not to have an investigation. I said because the members of the committee have a vested interest in seeing Trump charged with a crime, that the investigation was pointless. Nobody on that committee is objective or unbiased. They all want to see Trump referred to doj, even the republican members.
At least do not have one question until you, a DJT voter approves the set up of the people that would be doing the investigation
Again, I didn't vote for him. I would approve of the investigation if the committee doing it wasn't full of people who already admitted they think he is guilty and want to see him barred from office and/or in prison.
And you should know by now that if Qanon, Roger Stone Alex Jones and Ivanka Trump formed a committee and finishing up an investigation and found that DJT didn’t pay a parking ticket DJT would call it a witchhunt.
No idea what djt would think. Was there any evidence that he didn't pay? Was there any evidence he was illegally parked? Would the members of the committee investigating all be admitted haters and have interest in seeing him found guilty? There are things that would have to be determined.
Also. It doesn't matter what djt would say, what would matter is, is the investigation unbiased or not.
I'm not trying to protect Trump. I've stated repeatedly, again, and again and again and again, if the investigation was unbiased and the members didn't already have a stated vested in seeing Trump penalized, that I would support the outcome.