Liberals latest desperate attempt to avoid Benghazi

P@triot

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2011
61,906
11,928
2,060
United States
The latest desperate attempt by liberals to avoid Benghazi is to now cry about the money spent on investigating it ($7 million). Ironic coming from a group that lives to throw around money like a gangsta-rapper in a video. As usual, their ill-conceived plan here has backfired as it simply has gone to illustrate not only their hypocrisy, but their extraordinary level of financial waste and abuse.
  • The National Science Foundation spent $412,930 on a study that published scientific results on the “relationship between gender and glaciers.” The results concluded that “ice is not just ice,” and instructed scientists to take a “feminist postcolonial” approach when studying melting ice caps and climate change.
  • The soap opera series “Love, Sex, and Choices” has received $3,134,199 from the National Institutes of Health for 12 episodes about HIV. One episode viewed by the Washington Free Beacon begins with a graphic oral sex scene between a woman and her ex, while a child plays in the other room.
  • The National Endowment for the Arts recently spent $20,000 for a play about “rape culture,” and the Environmental Protection Agency has invested $90,000 in technology to track how long Americans spend in the shower when they stay in hotels.
  • Another National Science Foundation project has spent $548,459 videotaping male college engineering students while they work in labs to see if they are causing women to experience “microaggressions.”
  • Finally, a joint project by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the National Institutes of Health has spent $3,541,583 on a series of anti-obesity hip-hop songs, such as the Barry White-inspired “Bake Don’t Fry” that urges kids to lay off the French Fries.
The above mentioned taxpayer-funded projects total $7,747,171, over $500,000 more than what Congress spent investigating the Benghazi terrorist attack.

(Now watch as the liberals who respond to this thread attempt to make an even more desperate case about how "important" it is for tax payers to fund the study of glacier gender and rap songs :eusa_doh:)

Feds Spent More on Soap Operas, Obesity Rap Songs, Hotel Shower Monitoring Than Benghazi Committee
 
The Clowns in Congress have been wasting tax dollars for decades. Both parties spend money like it grows on a tree.
 
Funny...when a D pol is investigated, libs and their media complain about the outrageous costs. When an R pol is investigated, cost is of no concern and never mentioned in their media.

Clearly...someone is getting duped.
 
The latest desperate attempt by liberals to avoid Benghazi is to now cry about the money spent on investigating it ($7 million). Ironic coming from a group that lives to throw around money like a gangsta-rapper in a video. As usual, their ill-conceived plan here has backfired as it simply has gone to illustrate not only their hypocrisy, but their extraordinary level of financial waste and abuse.
  • The National Science Foundation spent $412,930 on a study that published scientific results on the “relationship between gender and glaciers.” The results concluded that “ice is not just ice,” and instructed scientists to take a “feminist postcolonial” approach when studying melting ice caps and climate change.
  • The soap opera series “Love, Sex, and Choices” has received $3,134,199 from the National Institutes of Health for 12 episodes about HIV. One episode viewed by the Washington Free Beacon begins with a graphic oral sex scene between a woman and her ex, while a child plays in the other room.
  • The National Endowment for the Arts recently spent $20,000 for a play about “rape culture,” and the Environmental Protection Agency has invested $90,000 in technology to track how long Americans spend in the shower when they stay in hotels.
  • Another National Science Foundation project has spent $548,459 videotaping male college engineering students while they work in labs to see if they are causing women to experience “microaggressions.”
  • Finally, a joint project by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the National Institutes of Health has spent $3,541,583 on a series of anti-obesity hip-hop songs, such as the Barry White-inspired “Bake Don’t Fry” that urges kids to lay off the French Fries.
The above mentioned taxpayer-funded projects total $7,747,171, over $500,000 more than what Congress spent investigating the Benghazi terrorist attack.

(Now watch as the liberals who respond to this thread attempt to make an even more desperate case about how "important" it is for tax payers to fund the study of glacier gender and rap songs :eusa_doh:)

Feds Spent More on Soap Operas, Obesity Rap Songs, Hotel Shower Monitoring Than Benghazi Committee

"The latest desperate attempt by liberals to avoid Benghazi is to now cry about the money spent on investigating it"

Naah...their last desperate pathetic attempt is to refer to the eighth and latest report to exonerate Hillary and the Administration.
 
The latest desperate attempt by liberals to avoid Benghazi is to now cry about the money spent on investigating it ($7 million).

Considering that the 7 million didn't fine ANYTHING that the previous 7 investigations didn't already find, um, yeah, it was waste of money.

I mean, it's not up there with the 70 million dollar investigation into whether or not Bill Clinton got a blow job or not.

But it's close.

Hey, here's a crazy idea. Instead of spending hundreds of million of dollars trying to get something on the Clintons, how about coming up with policies that make things better for working Americans?

I know, that's crazy and stuff.
 
The latest desperate attempt by liberals to avoid Benghazi is to now cry about the money spent on investigating it ($7 million).

Considering that the 7 million didn't fine ANYTHING that the previous 7 investigations didn't already find, um, yeah, it was waste of money.

I mean, it's not up there with the 70 million dollar investigation into whether or not Bill Clinton got a blow job or not.

But it's close.

Hey, here's a crazy idea. Instead of spending hundreds of million of dollars trying to get something on the Clintons, how about coming up with policies that make things better for working Americans?

I know, that's crazy and stuff.


CmCIctuWAAAzSYm.jpg
 
The latest desperate attempt by liberals to avoid Benghazi is to now cry about the money spent on investigating it ($7 million).

Considering that the 7 million didn't fine ANYTHING that the previous 7 investigations didn't already find, um, yeah, it was waste of money.

I mean, it's not up there with the 70 million dollar investigation into whether or not Bill Clinton got a blow job or not.

But it's close.

Hey, here's a crazy idea. Instead of spending hundreds of million of dollars trying to get something on the Clintons, how about coming up with policies that make things better for working Americans?

I know, that's crazy and stuff.
They found a lot, but you wouldn't know because your media has lied to you again.

Of course, your DNC talking points help to keep you duped.
 
The latest desperate attempt by liberals to avoid Benghazi is to now cry about the money spent on investigating it ($7 million). Ironic coming from a group that lives to throw around money like a gangsta-rapper in a video. As usual, their ill-conceived plan here has backfired as it simply has gone to illustrate not only their hypocrisy, but their extraordinary level of financial waste and abuse.
  • The National Science Foundation spent $412,930 on a study that published scientific results on the “relationship between gender and glaciers.” The results concluded that “ice is not just ice,” and instructed scientists to take a “feminist postcolonial” approach when studying melting ice caps and climate change.
  • The soap opera series “Love, Sex, and Choices” has received $3,134,199 from the National Institutes of Health for 12 episodes about HIV. One episode viewed by the Washington Free Beacon begins with a graphic oral sex scene between a woman and her ex, while a child plays in the other room.
  • The National Endowment for the Arts recently spent $20,000 for a play about “rape culture,” and the Environmental Protection Agency has invested $90,000 in technology to track how long Americans spend in the shower when they stay in hotels.
  • Another National Science Foundation project has spent $548,459 videotaping male college engineering students while they work in labs to see if they are causing women to experience “microaggressions.”
  • Finally, a joint project by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the National Institutes of Health has spent $3,541,583 on a series of anti-obesity hip-hop songs, such as the Barry White-inspired “Bake Don’t Fry” that urges kids to lay off the French Fries.
The above mentioned taxpayer-funded projects total $7,747,171, over $500,000 more than what Congress spent investigating the Benghazi terrorist attack.

(Now watch as the liberals who respond to this thread attempt to make an even more desperate case about how "important" it is for tax payers to fund the study of glacier gender and rap songs :eusa_doh:)

Feds Spent More on Soap Operas, Obesity Rap Songs, Hotel Shower Monitoring Than Benghazi Committee
Can I sue the fed govt for fraud, waste, abuse, & mis-management of my tax dollars?

This shit is why we don't need to raise taxes. Eliminate shit like this and we have more than enough money to run the country.

The Obama administration has enough money for shit like this but had to strip Ambassador Stephens of 14 members of his security team after 2 terrorist attacks on the US compound because they didn't have the money to pay for them?!

Hillary 'lost' $6 BILLION as Sect of State but denied hundreds of pleas from Stephens for additional security because the State Dept didn't have the money for additional security?!
 
The latest desperate attempt by liberals to avoid Benghazi is to now cry about the money spent on investigating it ($7 million).

Considering that the 7 million didn't fine ANYTHING that the previous 7 investigations didn't already find, um, yeah, it was waste of money.

I mean, it's not up there with the 70 million dollar investigation into whether or not Bill Clinton got a blow job or not.

But it's close.

Hey, here's a crazy idea. Instead of spending hundreds of million of dollars trying to get something on the Clintons, how about coming up with policies that make things better for working Americans?

I know, that's crazy and stuff.
So the investigation didn't find any illegal activity,but the last one certainly revealed how much of a cluster fuck went on that day,gross incompetence,but Clinton's flutters have no problem with that,dad but true.

This notion that somehow Congress wasn't able to do but one thing at a time is really reaching..

And don't forget your candidate is being investigated by the FBI involving some serious aligations,snd once more piss poor leadership.

Everything Clinton gets her fingers on.
Some kind of controversy follows behind,she coined the phrase"vast right wing conspiracy" when she was 1st lady trying to push a flawed national health care plan,we didn't hire her for anything,one problem after the next,file gate,travel gate, it has never stopped.
 
With the total screwing of lybia, any rational person, of any party should eliminate her as good candidate.
The country is a mess, countless deaths, thousands of refugees,and a haven and cash source for ISIS.
 
So the investigation didn't find any illegal activity,but the last one certainly revealed how much of a cluster fuck went on that day,gross incompetence,but Clinton's flutters have no problem with that,dad but true.

dude, Spell Check is not your friend.

I agree, a lot of mistakes were made that day and in the days leading up to the attack. i think getting involved in Libya's civil war was a mistake.

The biggest mistake was made by Chris Stevens scheduling a meeting in Benghazi on the anniversary of 9/11. A mistake was made by the CIA setting up a black site in that city that was obviously pissing people off.

So what?

This notion that somehow Congress wasn't able to do but one thing at a time is really reaching..

Congress held EIGHT investigations on this, and we don't know anything more than we did in 2012.

And don't forget your candidate is being investigated by the FBI involving some serious aligations,snd once more piss poor leadership.

One, she's not my candidate. I'm probably going to vote for Johnson.
Two, we've been watching you guys making 'serious allegations' against the Clintons for 25 years now.

Obviously, no one ever told you the story of the boy who cried Wolf when you were a child.

Everything Clinton gets her fingers on.
Some kind of controversy follows behind,she coined the phrase"vast right wing conspiracy" when she was 1st lady trying to push a flawed national health care plan,we didn't hire her for anything,one problem after the next,file gate,travel gate, it has never stopped.

Yes, it never does stop. Because frankly, if you put what the Clintons want on the ballot as a vote, you'd lose every time. so you guys need these fake non-scandals to distract the attention of working folks away from the fact that you are trying to screw them.

Here's the thing. If we had implemented Hillary's health care plan in 1994, we'd be in a lot better shape now.
 
So the investigation didn't find any illegal activity,but the last one certainly revealed how much of a cluster fuck went on that day,gross incompetence,but Clinton's flutters have no problem with that,dad but true.

dude, Spell Check is not your friend.

I agree, a lot of mistakes were made that day and in the days leading up to the attack. i think getting involved in Libya's civil war was a mistake.

The biggest mistake was made by Chris Stevens scheduling a meeting in Benghazi on the anniversary of 9/11. A mistake was made by the CIA setting up a black site in that city that was obviously pissing people off.

So what?

This notion that somehow Congress wasn't able to do but one thing at a time is really reaching..

Congress held EIGHT investigations on this, and we don't know anything more than we did in 2012.

And don't forget your candidate is being investigated by the FBI involving some serious aligations,snd once more piss poor leadership.

One, she's not my candidate. I'm probably going to vote for Johnson.
Two, we've been watching you guys making 'serious allegations' against the Clintons for 25 years now.

Obviously, no one ever told you the story of the boy who cried Wolf when you were a child.

Everything Clinton gets her fingers on.
Some kind of controversy follows behind,she coined the phrase"vast right wing conspiracy" when she was 1st lady trying to push a flawed national health care plan,we didn't hire her for anything,one problem after the next,file gate,travel gate, it has never stopped.

Yes, it never does stop. Because frankly, if you put what the Clintons want on the ballot as a vote, you'd lose every time. so you guys need these fake non-scandals to distract the attention of working folks away from the fact that you are trying to screw them.

Here's the thing. If we had implemented Hillary's health care plan in 1994, we'd be in a lot better shape now.
Joe, you have never learned that nothing is discredited just because YOU say so...and you never will.

Actually, the investigations you guys had said these things are discredited...

7 million dollars, and you had to admit Hillary did nothing wrong.
Buying into the vast right wing narrative,good for you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top