Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,864
- 2,040
And occasionally they slip the truth in there. You all on the left must like being Grubered. how sad
SNIP:
Because my news aggregator of choice is Memeorandum (and Drudge) Ezra Klein was constantly in my grill 3-4 years ago. Then, mercifully, the lords of Memeorandum started showing him a bit less.
My perception of Klein generally is if he isn’t being completely ridiculous he is being totally revealing (in a shoot-yourself-in-the-foot kind of way) about what and how liberals think.
Now he has his own shop with Vox, and while opining on the demise of The New Republic (a magazine a journalism professor I had in college once referred to as “conservative”…she’s Canadian) he dropped this little bomb that he probably thought was a gem on his readers (bold emphasis is mine).
But what made the New Republic and its peer policy magazines so great was how restlessly, relentlessly idiosyncratic they were — that’s how they drove new ideologies and new ideas to the fore. They were worse at covering policy than their digital successors, but probably better at thinking. Part of this was because they simply cared less what the audience thought — they saw their role as telling their audience what to think,
There you have it…
all of it here:
CRASHR Liberalism has one job...
SNIP:
Because my news aggregator of choice is Memeorandum (and Drudge) Ezra Klein was constantly in my grill 3-4 years ago. Then, mercifully, the lords of Memeorandum started showing him a bit less.
My perception of Klein generally is if he isn’t being completely ridiculous he is being totally revealing (in a shoot-yourself-in-the-foot kind of way) about what and how liberals think.
Now he has his own shop with Vox, and while opining on the demise of The New Republic (a magazine a journalism professor I had in college once referred to as “conservative”…she’s Canadian) he dropped this little bomb that he probably thought was a gem on his readers (bold emphasis is mine).
But what made the New Republic and its peer policy magazines so great was how restlessly, relentlessly idiosyncratic they were — that’s how they drove new ideologies and new ideas to the fore. They were worse at covering policy than their digital successors, but probably better at thinking. Part of this was because they simply cared less what the audience thought — they saw their role as telling their audience what to think,
There you have it…
all of it here:
CRASHR Liberalism has one job...