Liar in Chief invokes Executive Privilege over citizenship question..

[Wyatt earp]

It's irrelevant.

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

Wrong. It has nothing to do with Mueller's report. He obviously can accuse the President of a crime because Ken Starr accused Bill Clinton of about a dozen crimes. What he can't do is indict Trump.

Your blow hot gas out your ass, and you know it. All you Trump douchebags are sticking to this story even though you know it's total horseshit.

Please, If he would accuse the president you rightwingers would be screaming about overthrow by un-elected beurocrat.

Mueller sees the Congress as the Constitutional check on Presidential abuse of office.

Personally I could see it both ways - Mueller being a giant ***** for not stating the obvious conclusion that Trump is a corrupt POS....AND a wise man looking out for America’s long term political stability.

You see it only one way: Trump needs to be impeached. Of course, you're a douchebag and a brain damaged moron.

actually moron you got the cause and effect all confused.

It is BECAUSE Trump committed crimes I think he should be impeached.

NEVER would I advocate baseless impeachment, as it would be highly damaging to our country.

The left wanted Trump impeached before he was sworn in who are you fooling..like children you couldn't handle the American public rejected grown men in little girls bathrooms and illegal rapist killer Mexicans.


.

 

[bripat9643]

It's irrelevant.

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

NO, it was left to the AG, and in consultation with the AAG and the DOJ's counsels office they decided no actionable obstruction occurred, the DOJ policy on charging a sitting president not withstanding. As usual you commies reject the facts because of your TDS.

.

Horseshit. Mueller’s report is very clear on Congressional Job to hold the President accountable.

Accountable for what?

Crimes and abuse of office.

He hasn't committed any crimes or abused his office.

 

[Rustic]

• Trump invokes executive privilege ahead of House Oversiglht contempt vote for Barr, Ross

Trump invokes executive privilege ahead of House Oversight contempt vote for Barr, Ross - CNNPolitics

He is hiding some more crimes....no doubt. What a POS...

 

[Uncensored2008]

Yes, you lied. Even your own cite of the Mueller report shows that.

{In late July 2016, soon after WikiLeaks's first release of stolen documents, a foreign
government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy
advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of that foreign
government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That information prompted the FBI on July
31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign
were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.}

Let's repeat that, you scumbag liar:

Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.


Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

You really are a shameless liar, and none too bright.

One small problem, Papadopoulos never spoke to any Russian agents. He was approached by CIA assets, not Russian agents.

.

The concept that Mifsud was a CIA asset turns campaign interference into flat out treason, doesn't it?

The Obama administration tried to corrupt the government of the United States using the CIA?

He used a lot more than just the CIA, Brennen and Clapper should hire some quality lawyers. They're gonna need them.

.

I wish they needed lawyers.

But there would need to be equal justice under the law for that to be the case.

We have to accept the FACT that there is no law in America. The Aristocracy, including the deep state, is not subject to any law at all.

Barack Obama could rape a little boy on live TV, every leftist here would praise and defend him, an no charges would ever be filed.

That's just where we are as a nation.

I'm not that pessimistic yet. There are some top quality prosecutors looking into it.

.

Yes, and they will expose the information. But no democrat of rank will go to jail and the Nazi scum of the enemy press will distort and lie to cover up the crimes of the democrats, as they always do.

 

[edward37]

From the horses mouth

EXCLUSIVE: Trump disputes account of White House counsel's testimony to Mueller

.



Trump will eventually refer to this as Fake News, even though we watch him say it...

 

[Unkotare]

...

The left wanted Trump impeached before he was sworn in......


.

Sort of the opposite of obama and the Nobel Prize. The Minority Report of politics.

 

[Uncensored2008]

From the horses mouth

EXCLUSIVE: Trump disputes account of White House counsel's testimony to Mueller

.



Trump will eventually refer to this as Fake News, even though we watch him say it...

Hey stupid ****, what is the Steele Dossier?

 

[edward37]

From the horses mouth

EXCLUSIVE: Trump disputes account of White House counsel's testimony to Mueller

.



Trump will eventually refer to this as Fake News, even though we watch him say it...

Hey stupid ****, what is the Steele Dossier?

That's another subject asshole Try talking about why the moron would think a lawyer who knows the punishment would lie to congress Trump is a world class liar

 

[Uncensored2008]

From the horses mouth

EXCLUSIVE: Trump disputes account of White House counsel's testimony to Mueller

.



Trump will eventually refer to this as Fake News, even though we watch him say it...

Hey stupid ****, what is the Steele Dossier?

That's another subject asshole Try talking about why the moron would think a lawyer who knows the punishment would lie to congress Trump is a world class liar

No shit fer brains, it sure isn't.

Obama and Hillary actually did what Stephanopolous hypothesized about.

You really are quite stupid.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

There was no conclusion nor referral regarding obstruction

wrong. Evidence of Obstruction was absolutely referred to Congress for consideration.

You stupid shit, the Mueller report was a confidential report to the AG
.

You need to stop running your ignorant mouth and go read the report.

Mueller' s' signal on obstruction: Congress should take on trump

Throughout his report, Mueller signals clearly that he thinks Congress should settle that question, not the attorney general. By spending months investigating incidents of obstruction despite concluding he couldn’t indict a sitting president, Mueller gave lawmakers a starting point.

And he made sure not to get in their way. At one point, Mueller said he wanted to be certain he didn’t take actions that would “preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct” -- a hint that came complete with a footnote referring to impeachment.

Sending a "signal" is not a prosecutor's job. He was supposed to determine whether the Trump campaign committed any crimes. He found none.

Mueller was never a Prosecutor. He was an investigator. He had no authority to prosecute. What power he had was to turn the evidence over to the appropriate courts and the Congress. He's done this.

 

[harmonica]

• Trump invokes executive privilege ahead of House Oversiglht contempt vote for Barr, Ross

Trump invokes executive privilege ahead of House Oversight contempt vote for Barr, Ross - CNNPolitics

He is hiding some more crimes....no doubt. What a POS...

you are the Idiot In Chief

 

[OKTexas]

One small problem, Papadopoulos never spoke to any Russian agents. He was approached by CIA assets, not Russian agents.

.

The concept that Mifsud was a CIA asset turns campaign interference into flat out treason, doesn't it?

The Obama administration tried to corrupt the government of the United States using the CIA?

He used a lot more than just the CIA, Brennen and Clapper should hire some quality lawyers. They're gonna need them.

.

I wish they needed lawyers.

But there would need to be equal justice under the law for that to be the case.

We have to accept the FACT that there is no law in America. The Aristocracy, including the deep state, is not subject to any law at all.

Barack Obama could rape a little boy on live TV, every leftist here would praise and defend him, an no charges would ever be filed.

That's just where we are as a nation.

I'm not that pessimistic yet. There are some top quality prosecutors looking into it.

.

Yes, and they will expose the information. But no democrat of rank will go to jail and the Nazi scum of the enemy press will distort and lie to cover up the crimes of the democrats, as they always do.

We'll see, I have a bit more faith is Barr than that.

.

 

[OKTexas]

There was no conclusion nor referral regarding obstruction

wrong. Evidence of Obstruction was absolutely referred to Congress for consideration.

You stupid shit, the Mueller report was a confidential report to the AG
.

You need to stop running your ignorant mouth and go read the report.

Mueller' s' signal on obstruction: Congress should take on trump

Throughout his report, Mueller signals clearly that he thinks Congress should settle that question, not the attorney general. By spending months investigating incidents of obstruction despite concluding he couldn’t indict a sitting president, Mueller gave lawmakers a starting point.

And he made sure not to get in their way. At one point, Mueller said he wanted to be certain he didn’t take actions that would “preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct” -- a hint that came complete with a footnote referring to impeachment.

Sending a "signal" is not a prosecutor's job. He was supposed to determine whether the Trump campaign committed any crimes. He found none.

Mueller was never a Prosecutor. He was an investigator. He had no authority to prosecute. What power he had was to turn the evidence over to the appropriate courts and the Congress. He's done this.

Hey ignorant ass, you might want to read the ******* law, I posted it in post 314, his report was never intended for congress, it was for the AG.

.

 

[AntonToo]

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

Wrong. It has nothing to do with Mueller's report. He obviously can accuse the President of a crime because Ken Starr accused Bill Clinton of about a dozen crimes. What he can't do is indict Trump.

Your blow hot gas out your ass, and you know it. All you Trump douchebags are sticking to this story even though you know it's total horseshit.

Please, If he would accuse the president you rightwingers would be screaming about overthrow by un-elected beurocrat.

Mueller sees the Congress as the Constitutional check on Presidential abuse of office.

Personally I could see it both ways - Mueller being a giant ***** for not stating the obvious conclusion that Trump is a corrupt POS....AND a wise man looking out for America’s long term political stability.

You see it only one way: Trump needs to be impeached. Of course, you're a douchebag and a brain damaged moron.

actually moron you got the cause and effect all confused.

It is BECAUSE Trump committed crimes I think he should be impeached.

NEVER would I advocate baseless impeachment, as it would be highly damaging to our country.

The left wanted Trump impeached before he was sworn in who are you fooling..like children you couldn't handle the American public rejected grown men in little girls bathrooms and illegal rapist killer Mexicans.
.

I speak for me and you are 100% wrong.

Trump won the election and you can't just undo 50 million votes because you don't like the guy or his policies. There has to be crime involved for removal from office.

 

[Crixus]

• Trump invokes executive privilege ahead of House Oversiglht contempt vote for Barr, Ross

Trump invokes executive privilege ahead of House Oversight contempt vote for Barr, Ross - CNNPolitics

He is hiding some more crimes....no doubt. What a POS...

Obama invokes executive privilege over Fast and Furious documents

Obama invokes executive privilege over Fast and Furious documents


Just as the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform was about to vote Eric H. Holder Jr. in contempt of Congress for failing to comply with a subpoena for documents in the flawed Fast and Furious gun-tracking case, President Obama asserted executive privilege and backed up the attorney general’s position in refusing to turn over the material.

 

[AntonToo]

wrong. Evidence of Obstruction was absolutely referred to Congress for consideration.

You stupid shit, the Mueller report was a confidential report to the AG
.

You need to stop running your ignorant mouth and go read the report.

Mueller' s' signal on obstruction: Congress should take on trump

Throughout his report, Mueller signals clearly that he thinks Congress should settle that question, not the attorney general. By spending months investigating incidents of obstruction despite concluding he couldn’t indict a sitting president, Mueller gave lawmakers a starting point.

And he made sure not to get in their way. At one point, Mueller said he wanted to be certain he didn’t take actions that would “preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct” -- a hint that came complete with a footnote referring to impeachment.

Sending a "signal" is not a prosecutor's job. He was supposed to determine whether the Trump campaign committed any crimes. He found none.

Mueller was never a Prosecutor. He was an investigator. He had no authority to prosecute. What power he had was to turn the evidence over to the appropriate courts and the Congress. He's done this.

Hey ignorant ass, you might want to read the ******* law, I posted it in post 314, his report was never intended for congress, it was for the AG.

.

It was intended for Congress.

Mueller knew his report for a case of this magnitude was going straight there and to American people. If you didn't know that then you are a totally detached from reality idiot.

 

[bripat9643]

There was no conclusion nor referral regarding obstruction

wrong. Evidence of Obstruction was absolutely referred to Congress for consideration.

You stupid shit, the Mueller report was a confidential report to the AG
.

You need to stop running your ignorant mouth and go read the report.

Mueller' s' signal on obstruction: Congress should take on trump

Throughout his report, Mueller signals clearly that he thinks Congress should settle that question, not the attorney general. By spending months investigating incidents of obstruction despite concluding he couldn’t indict a sitting president, Mueller gave lawmakers a starting point.

And he made sure not to get in their way. At one point, Mueller said he wanted to be certain he didn’t take actions that would “preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct” -- a hint that came complete with a footnote referring to impeachment.

Sending a "signal" is not a prosecutor's job. He was supposed to determine whether the Trump campaign committed any crimes. He found none.

Mueller was never a Prosecutor. He was an investigator. He had no authority to prosecute. What power he had was to turn the evidence over to the appropriate courts and the Congress. He's done this.

If he's not a prosecutor, then how did he convict Manafort and several other victims of his witch hunt?

Virtually everything you post is wrong.

 

[bripat9643]

You stupid shit, the Mueller report was a confidential report to the AG
.

You need to stop running your ignorant mouth and go read the report.

Mueller' s' signal on obstruction: Congress should take on trump

Throughout his report, Mueller signals clearly that he thinks Congress should settle that question, not the attorney general. By spending months investigating incidents of obstruction despite concluding he couldn’t indict a sitting president, Mueller gave lawmakers a starting point.

And he made sure not to get in their way. At one point, Mueller said he wanted to be certain he didn’t take actions that would “preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct” -- a hint that came complete with a footnote referring to impeachment.

Sending a "signal" is not a prosecutor's job. He was supposed to determine whether the Trump campaign committed any crimes. He found none.

Mueller was never a Prosecutor. He was an investigator. He had no authority to prosecute. What power he had was to turn the evidence over to the appropriate courts and the Congress. He's done this.

Hey ignorant ass, you might want to read the ******* law, I posted it in post 314, his report was never intended for congress, it was for the AG.

.

It was intended for Congress.

Mueller knew his report for a case of this magnitude was going straight there and to American people. If you didn't know that then you are a totally detached from reality idiot.

Wrong again. The law says the report goes to the AG.

 

[AntonToo]

You need to stop running your ignorant mouth and go read the report.

Mueller' s' signal on obstruction: Congress should take on trump

Throughout his report, Mueller signals clearly that he thinks Congress should settle that question, not the attorney general. By spending months investigating incidents of obstruction despite concluding he couldn’t indict a sitting president, Mueller gave lawmakers a starting point.

And he made sure not to get in their way. At one point, Mueller said he wanted to be certain he didn’t take actions that would “preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct” -- a hint that came complete with a footnote referring to impeachment.

Sending a "signal" is not a prosecutor's job. He was supposed to determine whether the Trump campaign committed any crimes. He found none.

Mueller was never a Prosecutor. He was an investigator. He had no authority to prosecute. What power he had was to turn the evidence over to the appropriate courts and the Congress. He's done this.

Hey ignorant ass, you might want to read the ******* law, I posted it in post 314, his report was never intended for congress, it was for the AG.

.

It was intended for Congress.

Mueller knew his report for a case of this magnitude was going straight there and to American people. If you didn't know that then you are a totally detached from reality idiot.

Wrong again. The law says the report goes to the AG.

The law also says Congress can sabpoena the report and hold the president accountable for abuses of office.

Trump's pick-me-and-I'll-clear-you AG is but a loud bystander.

 

[bripat9643]

Sending a "signal" is not a prosecutor's job. He was supposed to determine whether the Trump campaign committed any crimes. He found none.

Mueller was never a Prosecutor. He was an investigator. He had no authority to prosecute. What power he had was to turn the evidence over to the appropriate courts and the Congress. He's done this.

Hey ignorant ass, you might want to read the ******* law, I posted it in post 314, his report was never intended for congress, it was for the AG.

.

It was intended for Congress.

Mueller knew his report for a case of this magnitude was going straight there and to American people. If you didn't know that then you are a totally detached from reality idiot.

Wrong again. The law says the report goes to the AG.

The law also says Congress can sabpoena the report and hold the president accountable for abuses of office.

AG is but a bystander.

Where does the law say that?