Liar in Chief invokes Executive Privilege over citizenship question..

[bripat9643]

Possibly? Are you ******* stupid?

Read finding 0. first dummy.

It's irrelevant.

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

Wrong. It has nothing to do with Mueller's report. He obviously can accuse the President of a crime because Ken Starr accused Bill Clinton of about a dozen crimes. What he can't do is indict Trump.

Your blow hot gas out your ass, and you know it. All you Trump douchebags are sticking to this story even though you know it's total horseshit.

Please, If he would accuse the president you rightwingers would be screaming about overthrow by un-elected beurocrat.

Mueller sees the Congress as the Constitutional check on Presidential abuse of office.

Personally I could see it both ways - Mueller being a giant ***** for not stating the obvious conclusion that Trump is a corrupt POS....AND a wise man looking out for America’s long term political stability.

You see it only one way: Trump needs to be impeached. Of course, you're a douchebag and a brain damaged moron.

 

[AntonToo]

Read finding 0. first dummy.

It's irrelevant.

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

Wrong. It has nothing to do with Mueller's report. He obviously can accuse the President of a crime because Ken Starr accused Bill Clinton of about a dozen crimes. What he can't do is indict Trump.

Your blow hot gas out your ass, and you know it. All you Trump douchebags are sticking to this story even though you know it's total horseshit.

Please, If he would accuse the president you rightwingers would be screaming about overthrow by un-elected beurocrat.

Mueller sees the Congress as the Constitutional check on Presidential abuse of office.

Personally I could see it both ways - Mueller being a giant ***** for not stating the obvious conclusion that Trump is a corrupt POS....AND a wise man looking out for America’s long term political stability.

You see it only one way: Trump needs to be impeached. Of course, you're a douchebag and a brain damaged moron.

actually moron you got the cause and effect all confused.

It is BECAUSE Trump committed crimes I think he should be impeached.

NEVER would I advocate baseless impeachment, as it would be highly damaging to our country.

 

[bripat9643]

It's irrelevant.

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

Wrong. It has nothing to do with Mueller's report. He obviously can accuse the President of a crime because Ken Starr accused Bill Clinton of about a dozen crimes. What he can't do is indict Trump.

Your blow hot gas out your ass, and you know it. All you Trump douchebags are sticking to this story even though you know it's total horseshit.

Please, If he would accuse the president you rightwingers would be screaming about overthrow by un-elected beurocrat.

Mueller sees the Congress as the Constitutional check on Presidential abuse of office.

Personally I could see it both ways - Mueller being a giant ***** for not stating the obvious conclusion that Trump is a corrupt POS....AND a wise man looking out for America’s long term political stability.

You see it only one way: Trump needs to be impeached. Of course, you're a douchebag and a brain damaged moron.

actually moron you got the cause and effect all confused.

It is BECAUSE Trump committed crimes I think he should be impeached.

I NEVER would advocate baseless impeachment, as it would be highly damaging to our country.

Horseshit. When have leftwingers ever cared about damaging the country?

 

[AntonToo]

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

Wrong. It has nothing to do with Mueller's report. He obviously can accuse the President of a crime because Ken Starr accused Bill Clinton of about a dozen crimes. What he can't do is indict Trump.

Your blow hot gas out your ass, and you know it. All you Trump douchebags are sticking to this story even though you know it's total horseshit.

Please, If he would accuse the president you rightwingers would be screaming about overthrow by un-elected beurocrat.

Mueller sees the Congress as the Constitutional check on Presidential abuse of office.

Personally I could see it both ways - Mueller being a giant ***** for not stating the obvious conclusion that Trump is a corrupt POS....AND a wise man looking out for America’s long term political stability.

You see it only one way: Trump needs to be impeached. Of course, you're a douchebag and a brain damaged moron.

actually moron you got the cause and effect all confused.

It is BECAUSE Trump committed crimes I think he should be impeached.

I NEVER would advocate baseless impeachment, as it would be highly damaging to our country.

Horseshit. When have leftwingers ever cared about damaging the country?

You are too stupid to ever understand much of anything, including other people’s motivations.

 

[bripat9643]

Wrong. It has nothing to do with Mueller's report. He obviously can accuse the President of a crime because Ken Starr accused Bill Clinton of about a dozen crimes. What he can't do is indict Trump.

Your blow hot gas out your ass, and you know it. All you Trump douchebags are sticking to this story even though you know it's total horseshit.

Please, If he would accuse the president you rightwingers would be screaming about overthrow by un-elected beurocrat.

Mueller sees the Congress as the Constitutional check on Presidential abuse of office.

Personally I could see it both ways - Mueller being a giant ***** for not stating the obvious conclusion that Trump is a corrupt POS....AND a wise man looking out for America’s long term political stability.

You see it only one way: Trump needs to be impeached. Of course, you're a douchebag and a brain damaged moron.

actually moron you got the cause and effect all confused.

It is BECAUSE Trump committed crimes I think he should be impeached.

I NEVER would advocate baseless impeachment, as it would be highly damaging to our country.

Horseshit. When have leftwingers ever cared about damaging the country?

You are too stupid to ever understand much of anything, including other people’s motivations.

ROFL! I understand the motivations of lying douchebags like you perfectly.

 

[SmokeALib]

Possibly? Are you ******* stupid?

Read finding 0. first dummy.

It's irrelevant.

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

NO, it was left to the AG, and in consultation with the AAG and the DOJ's counsels office they decided no actionable obstruction occurred, the DOJ policy on charging a sitting president not withstanding. As usual you commies reject the facts because of your TDS.

.

Horseshit. Mueller’s report is very clear on Congressional Job to hold the President accountable.

Accountable for what?

 

[AntonToo]

Read finding 0. first dummy.

It's irrelevant.

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

NO, it was left to the AG, and in consultation with the AAG and the DOJ's counsels office they decided no actionable obstruction occurred, the DOJ policy on charging a sitting president not withstanding. As usual you commies reject the facts because of your TDS.

.

Horseshit. Mueller’s report is very clear on Congressional Job to hold the President accountable.

Accountable for what?

Crimes and abuse of office.

 

[OKTexas]

Possibly? Are you ******* stupid?

Read finding 0. first dummy.

It's irrelevant.

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

NO, it was left to the AG, and in consultation with the AAG and the DOJ's counsels office they decided no actionable obstruction occurred, the DOJ policy on charging a sitting president not withstanding. As usual you commies reject the facts because of your TDS.

.

Not true. Inaccurate spin.

Prove it fool.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Possibly? Are you ******* stupid?

Read finding 0. first dummy.

It's irrelevant.

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

There was no conclusion nor referral regarding obstruction

wrong. Evidence of Obstruction was absolutely referred to Congress for consideration.

You stupid shit, the Mueller report was a confidential report to the AG, the AG decided to make most of it public. Had he chose to, he could have buried it in a dam file. Congress had no legal right to see it. So saying the report was directed to Congress is a ******* commie lie. Read the damn Special Counsel law.

.

 

[OKTexas]

It's irrelevant.

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

NO, it was left to the AG, and in consultation with the AAG and the DOJ's counsels office they decided no actionable obstruction occurred, the DOJ policy on charging a sitting president not withstanding. As usual you commies reject the facts because of your TDS.

.

Horseshit. Mueller’s report is very clear on Congressional Job to hold the President accountable.

Accountable for what?

Crimes and abuse of office.

Wow, great talking point, would you care to be specific?

.

 

[AntonToo]

Read finding 0. first dummy.

It's irrelevant.

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

There was no conclusion nor referral regarding obstruction

wrong. Evidence of Obstruction was absolutely referred to Congress for consideration.

You stupid shit, the Mueller report was a confidential report to the AG
.

You need to stop running your ignorant mouth and go read the report.

Mueller' s' signal on obstruction: Congress should take on trump

Throughout his report, Mueller signals clearly that he thinks Congress should settle that question, not the attorney general. By spending months investigating incidents of obstruction despite concluding he couldn’t indict a sitting president, Mueller gave lawmakers a starting point.

And he made sure not to get in their way. At one point, Mueller said he wanted to be certain he didn’t take actions that would “preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct” -- a hint that came complete with a footnote referring to impeachment.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You really are stupid, what I posted is the transcript of the Mueller team INTERVIEWING Papadopoulos.

I cited all of my claims.

You are really ******* stupid if you think MUELLER'S REPORT would be contradicted by THE MATERIALS OF MUELLERS OWN INVESTIGATION.

Thats like saying 2+2=1, total ******* nonsense.

Contradicted?

Are you on drugs again?

Yes dumbass, if you are arguing that that is false (my post you started refuting):

Nope, wrong again. It was Papadopolous that told TO Australian ambassador about Russians having dirt on Clinton, who then contacted FBI.

Then you are contradicting investigation's findings.


A.D.D. much?

Yes, you lied. Even your own cite of the Mueller report shows that.

{In late July 2016, soon after WikiLeaks's first release of stolen documents, a foreign
government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy
advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of that foreign
government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That information prompted the FBI on July
31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign
were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.}

Let's repeat that, you scumbag liar:

Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.


Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

You really are a shameless liar, and none too bright.

One small problem, Papadopoulos never spoke to any Russian agents. He was approached by CIA assets, not Russian agents.

.

The concept that Mifsud was a CIA asset turns campaign interference into flat out treason, doesn't it?

The Obama administration tried to corrupt the government of the United States using the CIA?

 

[Uncensored2008]

You are really ******* stupid if you think MUELLER'S REPORT would be contradicted by THE MATERIALS OF MUELLERS OWN INVESTIGATION.

Thats like saying 2+2=1, total ******* nonsense.

Contradicted?

Are you on drugs again?

Yes dumbass, if you are arguing that that is false (my post you started refuting):

Nope, wrong again. It was Papadopolous that told TO Australian ambassador about Russians having dirt on Clinton, who then contacted FBI.

Then you are contradicting investigation's findings.


A.D.D. much?

Yes, you lied. Even your own cite of the Mueller report shows that.

{In late July 2016, soon after WikiLeaks's first release of stolen documents, a foreign
government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy
advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of that foreign
government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That information prompted the FBI on July
31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign
were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.}

Let's repeat that, you scumbag liar:

Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.


Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

You really are a shameless liar, and none too bright.

One small problem, Papadopoulos never spoke to any Russian agents. He was approached by CIA assets, not Russian agents.

.

Stop spreading Russian horseshit.

That is directly counter to the findings of the investigation.

Why would anyone listen to you? You're a shameless liar.

Grand Inquisitor Mueller said;


{In late July 2016, soon after WikiLeaks's first release of stolen documents, a foreign
government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy
advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of that foreign
government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That information prompted the FBI on July
31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign
were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.}

 

[OKTexas]

It's irrelevant.

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

There was no conclusion nor referral regarding obstruction

wrong. Evidence of Obstruction was absolutely referred to Congress for consideration.

You stupid shit, the Mueller report was a confidential report to the AG
.

You need to stop running your ignorant mouth and go read the report.

Mueller' s' signal on obstruction: Congress should take on trump

Throughout his report, Mueller signals clearly that he thinks Congress should settle that question, not the attorney general. By spending months investigating incidents of obstruction despite concluding he couldn’t indict a sitting president, Mueller gave lawmakers a starting point.

And he made sure not to get in their way. At one point, Mueller said he wanted to be certain he didn’t take actions that would “preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct” -- a hint that came complete with a footnote referring to impeachment.

Read the ******* law commie.

§ 600.8 Notification and reports by the Special Counsel.
(a)Budget.

(1) A Special Counsel shall be provided all appropriate resources by the Department of Justice. Within the first 60 days of his or her appointment, the Special Counsel shall develop a proposed budget for the current fiscal year with the assistance of the Justice Management Division for the Attorney General's review and approval. Based on the proposal, the Attorney General shall establish a budget for the operations of the Special Counsel. The budget shall include a request for assignment of personnel, with a description of the qualifications needed.

(2) Thereafter, 90 days before the beginning of each fiscal year, the Special Counsel shall report to the Attorney General the status of the investigation, and provide a budget request for the following year. The Attorney General shall determine whether the investigation should continue and, if so, establish the budget for the next year.

(b)Notification of significant events. The Special Counsel shall notify the Attorney General of events in the course of his or her investigation in conformity with the Departmental guidelines with respect to Urgent Reports.

(c)Closing documentation. At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel.

If Mueller addressed anything to Congress in his report, he was acting outside his authority. Period, end of ******* story. Not only that, it has been proven "the report" left out exculpatory evidence by providing incomplete, out of context quotes.

.

 

[OKTexas]

You are really ******* stupid if you think MUELLER'S REPORT would be contradicted by THE MATERIALS OF MUELLERS OWN INVESTIGATION.

Thats like saying 2+2=1, total ******* nonsense.

Contradicted?

Are you on drugs again?

Yes dumbass, if you are arguing that that is false (my post you started refuting):

Nope, wrong again. It was Papadopolous that told TO Australian ambassador about Russians having dirt on Clinton, who then contacted FBI.

Then you are contradicting investigation's findings.


A.D.D. much?

Yes, you lied. Even your own cite of the Mueller report shows that.

{In late July 2016, soon after WikiLeaks's first release of stolen documents, a foreign
government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy
advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of that foreign
government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That information prompted the FBI on July
31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign
were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.}

Let's repeat that, you scumbag liar:

Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.


Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

You really are a shameless liar, and none too bright.

One small problem, Papadopoulos never spoke to any Russian agents. He was approached by CIA assets, not Russian agents.

.

The concept that Mifsud was a CIA asset turns campaign interference into flat out treason, doesn't it?

The Obama administration tried to corrupt the government of the United States using the CIA?

He used a lot more than just the CIA, Brennen and Clapper should hire some quality lawyers. They're gonna need them.

.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Contradicted?

Are you on drugs again?

Yes dumbass, if you are arguing that that is false (my post you started refuting):

Nope, wrong again. It was Papadopolous that told TO Australian ambassador about Russians having dirt on Clinton, who then contacted FBI.

Then you are contradicting investigation's findings.


A.D.D. much?

Yes, you lied. Even your own cite of the Mueller report shows that.

{In late July 2016, soon after WikiLeaks's first release of stolen documents, a foreign
government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy
advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of that foreign
government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That information prompted the FBI on July
31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign
were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.}

Let's repeat that, you scumbag liar:

Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.


Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

You really are a shameless liar, and none too bright.

One small problem, Papadopoulos never spoke to any Russian agents. He was approached by CIA assets, not Russian agents.

.

The concept that Mifsud was a CIA asset turns campaign interference into flat out treason, doesn't it?

The Obama administration tried to corrupt the government of the United States using the CIA?

He used a lot more than just the CIA, Brennen and Clapper should hire some quality lawyers. They're gonna need them.

.

I wish they needed lawyers.

But there would need to be equal justice under the law for that to be the case.

We have to accept the FACT that there is no law in America. The Aristocracy, including the deep state, is not subject to any law at all.

Barack Obama could rape a little boy on live TV, every leftist here would praise and defend him, an no charges would ever be filed.

That's just where we are as a nation.

 

[OKTexas]

Yes dumbass, if you are arguing that that is false (my post you started refuting):

Then you are contradicting investigation's findings.


A.D.D. much?

Yes, you lied. Even your own cite of the Mueller report shows that.

{In late July 2016, soon after WikiLeaks's first release of stolen documents, a foreign
government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy
advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of that foreign
government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That information prompted the FBI on July
31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign
were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.}

Let's repeat that, you scumbag liar:

Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.


Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Russian government that
it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

You really are a shameless liar, and none too bright.

One small problem, Papadopoulos never spoke to any Russian agents. He was approached by CIA assets, not Russian agents.

.

The concept that Mifsud was a CIA asset turns campaign interference into flat out treason, doesn't it?

The Obama administration tried to corrupt the government of the United States using the CIA?

He used a lot more than just the CIA, Brennen and Clapper should hire some quality lawyers. They're gonna need them.

.

I wish they needed lawyers.

But there would need to be equal justice under the law for that to be the case.

We have to accept the FACT that there is no law in America. The Aristocracy, including the deep state, is not subject to any law at all.

Barack Obama could rape a little boy on live TV, every leftist here would praise and defend him, an no charges would ever be filed.

That's just where we are as a nation.

I'm not that pessimistic yet. There are some top quality prosecutors looking into it.

.

 

[WEATHER53]

Only one set of people have problems with answering if they are a citizen.

 

[bripat9643]

It's irrelevant.

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

There was no conclusion nor referral regarding obstruction

wrong. Evidence of Obstruction was absolutely referred to Congress for consideration.

You stupid shit, the Mueller report was a confidential report to the AG
.

You need to stop running your ignorant mouth and go read the report.

Mueller' s' signal on obstruction: Congress should take on trump

Throughout his report, Mueller signals clearly that he thinks Congress should settle that question, not the attorney general. By spending months investigating incidents of obstruction despite concluding he couldn’t indict a sitting president, Mueller gave lawmakers a starting point.

And he made sure not to get in their way. At one point, Mueller said he wanted to be certain he didn’t take actions that would “preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct” -- a hint that came complete with a footnote referring to impeachment.

Sending a "signal" is not a prosecutor's job. He was supposed to determine whether the Trump campaign committed any crimes. He found none.

 

[WEATHER53]

No moron, it is 100% relavant.

It explains why Mueller COULD NOT directly accuse a sitting President of the crime and why “possibly” was used.

The charge of ACTUAL Obstruction of Justice against the President was left to Congress.

There was no conclusion nor referral regarding obstruction

wrong. Evidence of Obstruction was absolutely referred to Congress for consideration.

You stupid shit, the Mueller report was a confidential report to the AG
.

You need to stop running your ignorant mouth and go read the report.

Mueller' s' signal on obstruction: Congress should take on trump

Throughout his report, Mueller signals clearly that he thinks Congress should settle that question, not the attorney general. By spending months investigating incidents of obstruction despite concluding he couldn’t indict a sitting president, Mueller gave lawmakers a starting point.

And he made sure not to get in their way. At one point, Mueller said he wanted to be certain he didn’t take actions that would “preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct” -- a hint that came complete with a footnote referring to impeachment.

Sending a "signal" is not a prosecutor's job. He was supposed to determine whether the Trump campaign committed any crimes. He found none.

It was a witch hunt followed by a dissertation that brought No Charges