Something like 20-25% of all pregnancies spontaneously abort.Sure. A woman's body wakes up one day and says all by itself without conscious decision that it will abort the child it carries. Please.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Something like 20-25% of all pregnancies spontaneously abort.Sure. A woman's body wakes up one day and says all by itself without conscious decision that it will abort the child it carries. Please.
Something like 20-25% of all pregnancies spontaneously abort.
Curious what time honored classics were banned? And are these book restricted at school libraries or actually banned books (cannot be bought or sold in Florida locals)? It sounds like you are for “book bans” as long as they are books you approve.Awww, isn't that cute. You think you have some "Gotcha" thing going on.
No, I do not support many of the book bans. And if you think supporting one ban (removing porn) means supporting all the bans (removing time honored classics), you are an idiot.
Nope. Do you?Just curious...
Do you think it's okay for children to see images of a person being horribly tortured to death?
I don't believe any "lewd material" was accessible to anyone under 12.
Nope. Do you?
I noticed in an earlier post you support WEF/Democrats providing sexually explicit material to 12 year olds.
You said "I don't believe any "lewd material" was accessible to anyone under 12." to justify giving porn to kids.
Why do you support providing "Lewd material" to 12 year olds?
So you agree with the book bansJust as an FYI, it is illegal to provide access to pornography to children. Prosecute anyone who does.
Many of the books have nothing to do with sexually explicit material. Many of them were banned because republicans in florida seeason as pro-LGBTQ,The current fight is really over sexual material, and you know it.
Because some holier than thou LGBT idiot in the library would ignore the parents.
What drives people to silence others, and quash the free exchange of ideas?
^^^ wants ALL the banned books put back.Many of the books have nothing to do with sexually explicit material. Many of them were banned because republicans in florida seeason as pro-LGBTQ,
At no time have people who banned books been in the right.
But I like the responses from the world. Not just LeVar Burton, but others.
The artist Pink will be giving out banned books on her tour.
Banning books from a library is banning books. The fact that they are not illegal to own is not the point.
Removing inappropriate books from school libraries where children have access to them is not banning books.
Are you there?What drives people to silence others, and quash the free exchange of ideas?
“When I read Fahrenheit 451 for the first time,” LeVar Burton says, “I couldn’t imagine that situation in my reality. It was a shame, right? Wow. Those poor people in that misguided society. I live in that society now. That dystopian story has become my truth.”
LeVar Burton Wants You to Read Banned Books
Florida, the leading state, banned over 500 books. Florida’s governor is a huge proponent of that. This is massively concerning to the majority of Americans who do not support book bans.
Burton compares the banning of books to attempts to control women's bodies:
"This is part of a movement that we are battling for control over our minds and our bodies."
While liberals have been justifiably criticized for their efforts to alter classic works of fiction, conservatives seem to be pursuing a deeper and more pervasive effort to deny access to books they deem unacceptable.
But these same conservatives are the first to decry what they correctly describe as the war on conservative speech online, and the so-called "cancellation" of those who may have engaged in unpopular/unfashionable expression.
Why this disconnect?
Will the Constitution prevail, or are we on a steep slide into cultural darkness?
Nice try. I said nothing about providing sexual literature. But providing such literature when age appropriate should work.
Or, as I said, how about making a list and sending to the parents and let THEM decide.
This is the mindset we're dealing with, yes.So since they NY Times did it, all newspapers are liars and all their articles are lies? Ok then.
They're intractable.Smut, snowflake?
Moms for Liberty (an ironic name if ever there was one) opposes Ruby Bridges Goes to School: My True Story being allowed in school libraries.
One of their complaints about the book is that it has Norman Rockwell's The Problem We All Live With in it.
The tolerant Right.
Here's your "smut", dipshit:
Hey BackAgain. Take note of the PROPER use of sic in that first graphic.
You're welcome.
Yeah, that point has been made several times.
But I am too lazy to type "Banning books in public school libraries", so I assume the people reading the thread will understand.