Let's hear from all of the USMB Covid vax supporters: Who is getting the new booster shot for the latest variant?

[Coyote]

"Anti-vax vitriol." - Translation:
"I got my jabs and I believe President Biden, my Hero! So shut the hell up!

View attachment 825798

Does posting in big bold fonts make you feel better?

 

[ChemEngineer]

Does posting in big bold fonts make you feel better?

First, these idiotic fonts are too small to read easily. I address that by enlarging them and putting them in bold fonts. It helps me read them more comfortably and I'm sure many others here too.

Second, I find your "anti-big, bold font vitriol" childish and ignorant.

Why don't you tell Management to incorporate rules preventing the utilization of tools provided here for our use? That makes a lot of sense, doesn't it "anti-big, bold font vitriol" spewer.

You had not a word to say about the distinguished medical doctor's analysis, calling the Covid Cult Panic "the biggest hoax ever perpetrated."

That's because you are one of the Cultists and you can't admit that you were wrong and very stupid. Wear your blue sheep mask to bed. It will protect you from the Space Lazers!

 

[sparky]

you folks are really f*cked up......~S~

 

[wihosa]

"Anti-vax vitriol." - Translation:
"I got my jabs and I believe President Biden, my Hero! So shut the hell up!"

View attachment 825798

So the millions of death certificates issued world wide during the pandemic were all a hoax...thousands of health professionals all conspired to fake millions of deaths...

Another f#cking red hat moron...

 

[ChemEngineer]

you folks are really f*cked up......~S~

"sparky," you failed to specify WHICH folks you attack so profanely.

I don't care which side you are on. I resent your failure to tell those you despise WHY they are wrong, and your ignorant vulgarity in expressing your undirected rancor, much less why. I think I'll add you to my Ignore List so I won't have to read any more of such dreck.
ciao brutto

 

[ChemEngineer]

So the millions of death certificates issued world wide during the pandemic were all a hoax...thousands of health professionals all conspired to fake millions of deaths...

Another f#cking red hat moron...

The 1912 Flu Epidemic killed millions. The American government didn't fire people then for failure to comply with its petty edicts, did it?
The jabs have killed tens of thousands with blood clots and heart attacks. You could care less about them. You just like to feign intellectualism while using ignorant profanity.
So typical of Biden's lackeys.

I'll bet you're also a Climate Change Cultist.....

Climate Change Cult

climate-change-cult.blogspot.com

 

[wihosa]

The 1912 Flu Epidemic killed millions. The American government didn't fire people then for failure to comply with its petty edicts, did it?
The jabs have killed tens of thousands with blood clots and heart attacks. You could care less about them. You just like to feign intellectualism while using ignorant profanity.
So typical of Biden's lackeys.

I'll bet you're also a Climate Change Cultist.....

Climate Change Cult

climate-change-cult.blogspot.com

Of course you don't believe climate change is real...97 percent of climate scientists agree that human activity is the cause of global warming caused climate changes and you think it's a cult...

Another f#cking red hat moron...

 

[ChemEngineer]

Of course you don't believe climate change is real...97 percent of climate scientists agree that human activity is the cause of global warming caused climate changes and you think it's a cult...

Another f#cking red hat moron...

All you can do is repeat the 97% trope from one paper written by a graduate student whose limited results she took out of context.

I have been studying their lies for decades and compiled facts which will make you cry, deny, and wet your pants, lad.
Read some science here.

Climate Change Cult

climate-change-cult.blogspot.com

theglobalwarmingfraud

theglobalwarmingfraud.wordpress.com

And grow up.

 

[ChemEngineer]

First, these idiotic fonts are too small to read easily. I address that by enlarging them and putting them in bold fonts. It helps me read them more comfortably and I'm sure many others here too.

Second, I find your "anti-big, bold font vitriol" childish and ignorant.

Why don't you tell Management to incorporate rules preventing the utilization of tools provided here for our use? That makes a lot of sense, doesn't it "anti-big, bold font vitriol" spewer.

You had not a word to say about the distinguished medical doctor's analysis, calling the Covid Cult Panic "the biggest hoax ever perpetrated."

That's because you are one of the Cultists and you can't admit that you were wrong and very stupid. Wear your blue sheep mask to bed. It will protect you from the Space Lazers!

View attachment 825802

And the Moderator Coyote had nothing more to say, thankfully.

 

[koshergrl]

So the millions of death certificates issued world wide during the pandemic were all a hoax...thousands of health professionals all conspired to fake millions of deaths...

Another f#cking red hat moron...

Pretty much, yep.
They did it for $$. Where have you been? It isn't even contested any more, except by brainwashed minions.

 

[WEATHER53]

The experimentation and disruption of America has come and gone
No more playing cowards and for Gods sake you imbeciles rip these current masks off your simpleton advertising faces.

 

[badger2]

Hospitals received $19,000 for the use of each ventilator.

 

[WEATHER53]

Does posting in big bold fonts make you feel better?

I believe he has eye issues so don’t be a dolt

 

[ChemEngineer]

I play tennis six times a week. I looked up the claim by USTA President that "tennis extends life expectancy more than any other sport." He was correct. 9.7 years longer life

Larger fonts make Coyote whine like a transgender, so this is yet another excellent reason to Font Up!

(Don't poke sticks at the bear.)

My patent pending tennis racket, with strings going to the edges of the frame, front,, back, front, back, to prevent framing mishits. I drilled out a standard racket in my garage and had a friend string it for me.

 

[badger2]

View attachment 828912

I play tennis six times a week. I looked up the claim by USTA President that "tennis extends life expectancy more than any other sport." He was correct. 9.7 years longer life

Yes and weren't Moderna funds involved? Which makes the trophy even more profound.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Of course you don't believe climate change is real...97 percent of climate scientists agree that human activity is the cause of global warming caused climate changes and you think it's a cult...

Another f#cking red hat moron...

You are a Leftist Liar. NO, 97% of climate scientists do NOT agree.
BUT IF THEY DID, consensus is not science. You're too simple to understand that.

Read and learn, IF you are capable of learning:

Scientific consensus – a manufactured construct



MARYANNE DEMASI, PHD

APR 12, 2023

In a recent interview, famed astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson was challenged on his scientific views about COVID-19 and he said “I’m only interested in consensus” - words that would have Nicholas Copernicus and Galileo Galilei rolling in their graves.

The appeal to “scientific consensus” is fraught with problems, just like “the science is settled” and “trust the science” and other authoritarian tropes that have dominated the pandemic.

A widely accepted theory, such as the theory of evolution, depends on a consensus being reached among the scientific community, but it must be achieved without censorship or reprisal.

As Aaron Kheriaty, a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, recently said:

Science is an ongoing search for truth & such truth has little to do with consensus. Every major scientific advance involves challenges to a consensus. Those who defend scientific consensus rather than specific experimental findings are not defending science but partisanship.

Consensus by Censorship

It’s not difficult to reach a scientific consensus when you squelch dissenting voices.

The origin of COVID is a classic example. Twenty-seven scientists published a letter in The Lancet condemning “conspiracy theories” that suggested the virus did not have a natural origin. Dissenting views were censored on social media and labelled “misinformation.”

It’s only now, that the US Department of Energy and the FBI say the virus was likely the result of a lab leak in Wuhan, that it’s possible to have these discussions openly.

The Great Barrington Declaration is another example. Three eminent professors from Harvard, Stanford, and Oxford Universities, argued against lockdowns, which they said would disproportionately harm the underprivileged.

But former NIH director Francis Collins dismissed them as “fringe epidemiologists” asking Anthony Fauci for “a quick and devastating take down” of the declaration.





Scientific consensus has become a manufactured construct, dictated by politics and power.

The recent release of the ‘Twitter Files’ reveals how government agencies, Big Tech, media, and academia colluded in an effort to police online content, and censor dissenting voices to create a false perception of consensus.

One egregious example was Stanford University’s Virality Project that brought together elite academia, experts in artificial intelligence, and social media companies to censor “true” stories of vaccine injuries under the guise of fighting disinformation.

Robert Malone, physician and pioneer of mRNA technology summed up the situation accurately when he said;

“The real problem here is the damn press and the internet giants. The press and these tech players act to manufacture and reinforce "consensus" around selected and approved narratives. And then this is being weaponized to attack dissenters including highly qualified physicians.”

The pandemic has made this insidious behaviour more visible, but the reality is, it has been happening for a long time – I would know – I was caught up in it.

Consensus in mainstream media

As a TV presenter on ABC’s top ranking science program Catalyst for over a decade, my role was to investigate science issues and, if necessary, challenge orthodoxy.

The ABC is not funded by private industry, but by the public purse, to avoid the bias which befalls the commercial networks. Or so I thought.

Several years ago, my successful career at the ABC came to a grinding halt after defenders of “scientific consensus” criticised several documentaries I produced, which questioned various medical orthodoxies such as cholesterol-lowering drugs, nutritional guidelines, and the over-prescription of medicines.

One documentary questioned the health impacts of prolonged exposure to wireless devices (such as iPads, laptops, and smart phones) which emit low frequency radiation - we did our due diligence and undertook an excruciating process of reviewing the program for legal, editorial, and factual integrity.

In the program, we questioned why the Australian government’s radiation safety authority (ARPANSA) had safety standards that were out-of-date, and excluded important evidence from multiple peer-reviewed papers by independent scientists.

It unleashed a firestorm of complaints from the Telco industry, the regulatory authority and ARPANSA, all of which had been preparing for the biggest wireless roll-out the country had ever seen.

Industry experts emerged from the shadows, and the media obliged, uncritically reporting criticisms of the program, while ignoring those defending it. No attention was paid to industry’s influence over the science.

Critics complained that I’d given weight to a “fringe” position that was not supported by science. And by “fringe” they were referring Devra Davis, professor of epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh, with a distinguished career at the National Academy of Sciences, and the National Research Council.

The ABC caved to the relentless pressure and suspended me from on-air duties, concluding that I’d given prominence “to views challenging the scientific consensus.”

And by “scientific consensus,” they meant the position taken by ARPANSA, the very organisation I had criticised for its lax regulations.

Eventually, the ABC banned the program and “restructured” the department by firing the staff. What the network believed would be a quick solution, had serious and far-reaching consequences.

It would not only deter future journalists from questioning orthodoxy, but it sent a chilling message that the ABC would succumb to industry pressure and favour scientific consensus.

I think Michael Crichton - physician, producer, and writer - explained it best when he gave a lecture on science, politics, and consensus in 2003;

I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled.

He continued:

Consensus is the business of politics….The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period.

 

[skye]

I feel so sorry for all these sheeple.....

That keep believing what they are told about the poison vaccines.....that the poison clot will save their lives....

I'm sorry for their families and friends when they are gone....they will be missed.

 

[sparky]

"sparky," you failed to specify WHICH folks you attack so profanely.

There's no need to point out the obvious Chem

~S~

 

[theHawk]

 

[ChemEngineer]

Kids catching Covid-19 is rare and manageable. Ivermectin cures it 100%.