Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 60,411
- 25,332
- 2,173
He didn't refuse to discuss it.
He never attempted to argue that her distinction between biological sex and sociological gender was incorrect or improper.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He didn't refuse to discuss it.
No. You didn’t. You don’t know what a fact is.I specifically brought up the facts supporting what I've said.
You you can't refute it, you don't have any honesty to admit it, so you are down to your usual content free flaming bullshit.
Do you have any explanation for why the majority of the leftists here on USMB can't do the same?
No. You didn’t.
Again, just about all prominent Democrats and large majorities of lefties have condemned the murder.
Overall the left has absolutely condemned Kirk's murder and rejects political violence in general.
Moron. That’s a claim. It isn’t evidenceYes I did, here it is:
I deny your unsupported claim. You idiot.You can't even aknowdge that I've said that, let alone be able to somehow refute it.
Nah. That’s just your latest projection bullshit.You just like to talk alot about nothing.
Describe what you believe this "radicalization" is.it's called radicalization. ever hear of it?
Shit dude, my own daughter is staunch demofk. I can't even discuss politics with her.
None of that shit has happened by anyone on the left here at USMB.I never asked you to mourn for him. I expected you to act like an adult human being about it.
That is all. You're free to feel however you want, but mocking someone for being senselessly murdered, celebrating it, or even trying to justify it is beyond the scope of what most people call decency.
The guy who killed Charlie Kirk.Describe what you believe this "radicalization" is.
Moron. That’s a claim. It isn’t evidence
I deny your unsupported claim. You idiot.
Nah. That’s just your latest projection bullshit.
Why not take a big gulp from a huge steaming mug of STFU?
Yeah, that doesn't make any sense.The guy who killed Charlie Kirk.
split time in public and catholic school. She had her issue with W, when he refused access to fetal tissue for something. My grandson has CP, and she saw fetal tissue as some form of fix.
I never asked you to mourn for him. I expected you to act like an adult human being about it.

I was not on USMB when that story broke.Yes I do, it's the same explanation as why the majority of the righties here on USMB, including you, didn't take time to explicitly condemn murder of Minessota Democrats by a pro-life evangelical righwinger.
People are mostly busy complaining about the other side, thats just how it goes.
The Legal profession is the biggest problem facing America.Mike Nefong was a giant asshole and I forgot about him until you just reminded me. It was a travesty of justice that he didn't have to live in prison for a very long time. He should have. Instead he was permanently disbarred but I agree, prison time was a much better idea.
Yeah, that doesn't make any sense.
But I guess that's to be expected coming from you.
Qualifications are irrelevant? Are you sure you’re not a DEI hire?
Your meme seems to express doubt. What exactly do you doubt about what I said?Not true.
![]()
Yeah see, this is the problem.
He called her a DEI hire meaning that he--Kirk--is only considering her race and gender.
Superiority of what? College degrees do not a competent VP make. Besides, Vance's resume looks just as impressive as Harris': Marine Corps; a tour in Iraq; Bachelor's degree and a Yale Law School degree; Bestselling author and U.S. Senator. I'm not really sure what you see that makes her more qualified than Vance.If you look at the qualifications--which is all you should look at (outside of background checks and that sort of thing) when hiring someone--she had what you even admitted was an “impressive resume”. You take her qualifications and put them on a white piece of paper next to the current VP for example, there is no question about her superiority to Vance.
"Had it in"? What does that mean?In my opinion, the far right has had it in for academia over my whole life. Same shit, different year.
That can certainly be one conclusion.it is their objective to hurt women.
it's what demofks do, they obliviate out some foreign place with statements never said by anyone, yet their reactions are that like it was. fk I can't stand a demofk. most irrational life form.I never asked you to mourn for him. I expected you to act like an adult human being about it.
That is all. You're free to feel however you want, but mocking someone for being senselessly murdered, celebrating it, or even trying to justify it is beyond the scope of what most people call decency.
How many Charlie Kirk threads do we need?For those on the left who insist on having a 'conversation' about hot-button issues--remember that's all Charlie Kirk wanted to do.
"Let's have a conversation."
Charlie Kirk wanted to 'have a conversation,' and he got shot dead for it. Is it a conversation you want, or something else? Say, maybe, total capitulation to your own views of the world?
Think about that for a minute. Please.
I was not on USMB when that story broke.