Let's have a conversation

He didn't refuse to discuss it.

He never attempted to argue that her distinction between biological sex and sociological gender was incorrect or improper.
 
I specifically brought up the facts supporting what I've said.

You you can't refute it, you don't have any honesty to admit it, so you are down to your usual content free flaming bullshit.
No. You didn’t. You don’t know what a fact is.

Until you present some facts, there’s nothing to rebut you dishonest hack.

You can’t meaningfully address the alleged “content free” posting of others until and unless you start posting something with content and merit.

Cry harder.
 
Do you have any explanation for why the majority of the leftists here on USMB can't do the same?

Yes I do, it's the same explanation as why the majority of the righties here on USMB, including you, didn't take time to explicitly condemn murder of Minessota Democrats by a pro-life evangelical righwinger.

People are mostly busy complaining about the other side, thats just how it goes.
 
No. You didn’t.

Yes I did, here it is:
Again, just about all prominent Democrats and large majorities of lefties have condemned the murder.

And here:
Overall the left has absolutely condemned Kirk's murder and rejects political violence in general.

You can't even aknowdge that I've said that, let alone be able to somehow refute it.


You just like to talk a lot about nothing.
 
it's called radicalization. ever hear of it?

Shit dude, my own daughter is staunch demofk. I can't even discuss politics with her.
Describe what you believe this "radicalization" is.
 
I never asked you to mourn for him. I expected you to act like an adult human being about it.

That is all. You're free to feel however you want, but mocking someone for being senselessly murdered, celebrating it, or even trying to justify it is beyond the scope of what most people call decency.
None of that shit has happened by anyone on the left here at USMB.

If you think it did, please link to those posts.
 
Moron. That’s a claim. It isn’t evidence

I deny your unsupported claim. You idiot.

Nah. That’s just your latest projection bullshit.

Why not take a big gulp from a huge steaming mug of STFU?

Even rightwingers in this thread have admitted that most lefties mostly condemned the murder. You are being ridiculous.

Constructively:

What does the support look like to you?

You want a full list of all lefties and Democrats and their statements? Thats not realistic, I can post them all day long and won't get through even a fraction.

If you'd quit your silly ego trips you'd quickly realize that your posts are just thoughtless dumster fire.
 
split time in public and catholic school. She had her issue with W, when he refused access to fetal tissue for something. My grandson has CP, and she saw fetal tissue as some form of fix.

On the risk of sounding like an idiot who is W?

I never asked you to mourn for him. I expected you to act like an adult human being about it.

You expected WAY too much out of this... Lord Jesus please help me as I'm currently fighting the urge to call him a moonbat. I'm fighting SOOOOO hard!!! :bang3:
 
Yes I do, it's the same explanation as why the majority of the righties here on USMB, including you, didn't take time to explicitly condemn murder of Minessota Democrats by a pro-life evangelical righwinger.

People are mostly busy complaining about the other side, thats just how it goes.
I was not on USMB when that story broke.

So, couldn't denounce the shooting then, but I absolutely denounce it now - Even as I have reason to disagree on some of your claims about his motives or ideology.

He wrote in a (suicide?) letter to the authorities that Walz was behind it, and some other things seemed rather odd, too.

 
Mike Nefong was a giant asshole and I forgot about him until you just reminded me. It was a travesty of justice that he didn't have to live in prison for a very long time. He should have. Instead he was permanently disbarred but I agree, prison time was a much better idea.
The Legal profession is the biggest problem facing America.

You might say 'dimocrap scum' are. But guess what? There's a lot of lawyers in the dimocrap scum party. A lot. A third in the house. 33% While in the General Population, they make up less than 1/2 of 1 percent. So why does one vocation have 66 times more representation in Congress?

Take a guess

All these bullshit rulings from Judges? Guess what you heve to be in order to be a Judge. If you said 'Lawyer' you get a prize.

Then there's the Senate. Over 120 times more lawyers than in the GenPop. Why? You ask.
 
Yeah, that doesn't make any sense.

But I guess that's to be expected coming from you.


So in other words you got nothing. Yeah, that's to be expected coming from you. Btw, you don't start a sentence with the word but.
 
Qualifications are irrelevant? Are you sure you’re not a DEI hire?

Not what I said. Qualifications are important but Harris' qualifications didn't make her qualified for the job of VP. Rather, her qualifications didn't help her as VP and she did a horrible job. Why? In my personal opinion, she didn't care. The vibe I got from her was that she never took the job seriously.
Not true.

jennifer-lawrence-ok.gif
Your meme seems to express doubt. What exactly do you doubt about what I said?
Yeah see, this is the problem.

He called her a DEI hire meaning that he--Kirk--is only considering her race and gender.

Because Biden only considered her race and gender.
If you look at the qualifications--which is all you should look at (outside of background checks and that sort of thing) when hiring someone--she had what you even admitted was an “impressive resume”. You take her qualifications and put them on a white piece of paper next to the current VP for example, there is no question about her superiority to Vance.
Superiority of what? College degrees do not a competent VP make. Besides, Vance's resume looks just as impressive as Harris': Marine Corps; a tour in Iraq; Bachelor's degree and a Yale Law School degree; Bestselling author and U.S. Senator. I'm not really sure what you see that makes her more qualified than Vance.
 
15th post
I never asked you to mourn for him. I expected you to act like an adult human being about it.

That is all. You're free to feel however you want, but mocking someone for being senselessly murdered, celebrating it, or even trying to justify it is beyond the scope of what most people call decency.
it's what demofks do, they obliviate out some foreign place with statements never said by anyone, yet their reactions are that like it was. fk I can't stand a demofk. most irrational life form.
 
For those on the left who insist on having a 'conversation' about hot-button issues--remember that's all Charlie Kirk wanted to do.

"Let's have a conversation."

Charlie Kirk wanted to 'have a conversation,' and he got shot dead for it. Is it a conversation you want, or something else? Say, maybe, total capitulation to your own views of the world?

Think about that for a minute. Please.
How many Charlie Kirk threads do we need?
Time to get back to those Epstein files.
 
Back
Top Bottom