Let's have a conversation

What is "fake" about the Epstein files? Even Charlie Kirk demanded that the Trump Administration release the full, unredacted files.
Are you trying to say Saint Charlie was full of shit now?



I'm trying to say that I don't have time for this. :rolleyes:
 
Didn't ignore it. You believe women can have a prostrate. I don't. What is there to discuss?

And here’s the admission that I was right all along.

You don’t want discussion.
 
Even rightwingers in this thread have admitted that most lefties mostly condemned the murder. You are being ridiculous.
Moron: I don’t know that most lefties condemned the assassination. But let’s say it’s true.

Not the point.

The point is that anyone who is spouting any glee over the assassination of Charlie Kirk is a leftist. Period. Try to follow along.

Constructively:

What does the support look like to you?

You want a full list of all lefties and Democrats and their statements? Thats not realistic, I can post them all day long and won't get through even a fraction.

If you'd quit your silly ego trips you'd quickly realize that your posts are just thoughtless dumster fire.
Sorry bit that entire second portion of your post is, as expected, quite meaningless.
 
And here’s the admission that I was right all along.

You don’t want discussion.
You are always right. You are intellectually and morally superior to all of us. You tell us that every day.

Have a blessed day,
 
She certainly appeared smarter, better prepared and quicker witted than he was.

That theme repeats during the discussion.

Of course you don’t see any problem with just ignoring what the other side says, because you’re not interested in discussion. It’s a performance.
Occasionally, I read or hear something logical or at least partially sensible from a Leftist. But that is the exception and not the rule.
 
Don't care for it. Undermine it. See it as a low priority. You seriously don't understand that very common phrase? Do you live in the states?
Do you seriously have to be a pretentious prick?

When I hear "had it in", I take that to mean they're out to destroy the person or thing. So naturally I am curious as to how you think the right is trying to destroy academia.
 
You are always right. You are intellectually and morally superior to all of us. You tell us that every day.

It’s not like I sit under a banner that says “prove me wrong” and tell teenagers that all day long.

That’s how Kirk got rich.
 
Do you seriously have to be a pretentious prick?

When I hear "had it in", I take that to mean they're out to destroy the person or thing. So naturally I am curious as to how you think the right is trying to destroy academia.
because we dare speak there.
 
It’s not like I sit under a banner that says “prove me wrong” and tell teenagers that all day long.

That’s how Kirk got rich.
great moniker.
 
Cute. A troll.
kirk was a man looking for knowledge and sharing that knowledge. Feel free to prove us wrong that he challenged students to do better and learn new material.
 
Do you seriously have to be a pretentious prick?

When I hear "had it in", I take that to mean they're out to destroy the person or thing. So naturally I am curious as to how you think the right is trying to destroy academia.
By maligning it through their ideologies, traditional norms and 'activism'. Like they've done for decades if not centuries.
 
15th post
I don’t know that most lefties condemned the assassination. But let’s say it’s true.

So first you ***** about me making empty assertions,

when I show you the basis you complain about me not supporting it enough,

When I explain to you that it’a unreasonable ask to list everyone …you change your mind and say you’ll just assume it true.


Does that strike you as someone who thinks things out before posting?
 
Last edited:
Which begs the question, how do you leave a rifle in the bushes without bringing it down from the roof?

Some rather strange things about this murder. Hoping Patel is up for the challenge.


My point exactly. Going up and coming down. It was not clear in those video.
Also, They could discuss the guy going down the stairs but they never mention it. //
 
So first you ***** about me supposedly not supporting something…then you change your mind and say you’ll assume it true.
You didn’t support it. You still haven’t.

There’s a concept you clearly never heard of. It’s called “for the sake of the discussion.” Look it up. You imbecile.
Does that strike you as someone who thinks things out before posting?
Nothing you post ever strikes me as having been thought out. Obviously, it’s beyond your skill set.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom