Let's have a conversation

He never attempted to argue that her distinction between biological sex and sociological gender was incorrect or improper.
He gave her three tries. She could only recite her prewritten answer. They moved on and had a decent discussion. Her reading of her prewritten screeds certain detracted from the debate.
 
How are crazy comments like this NOT "calling for politiclal violence"?

Lots of comments about supposedly hateful, violent left....but absolutely nothing to say about this.
Do you believe the President is a fascist and those that support this President are fascists?
 
He gave her three tries.
You’re proving what I said. He didn’t like her answer so he asked the same question again hoping she’d say what he wanted instead of actually having a discussion.
She could only recite her prewritten answer
Which he had no response for.
They moved on and had a decent discussion.
He did much the same during the rest of the discussion, ignoring her statements.
Her reading of her prewritten screeds certain detracted from the debate.
That’s called being prepared.
 
Not worth its own thread --



Fulton County District Attorney and Last Resort Hook-Up Fani Willis on Tuesday lost her bid to get back on the Georgia election interference case against President Trump -- who celebrated by calling her a "disaster."

The embattled, enTwinkied prosecutor and future Mukbang content creator was booted from the high-profile case in December by the Georgia Court of Appeals, which cited the "appearance of impropriety" and "general grossness" over her affair with the special prosecutor and booty-servicing "King of Sting" Nathan Wade leading the case.

Georgia's top court said Tuesday that it would not consider reversing a lower court's ruling.

Trump cheered the decision on the White House lawn just before he departed for the UK -- arguing that the felonious swampass Willis should be prosecuted.

We were unable to obtain comment from her gnarly quim.
 
Yea yea, everyone's got a story.

But reality is that you DIDN'T denounce untill I pointed it out to you.
And you didn't denounce Charlie Kirk's shooting until I prompted YOU to do so.

Your comments are searchable, and everyone can see how you TRIED to divert attention and culpability away from the shooter.

 
You’re proving what I said. He didn’t like her answer so he asked the same question again hoping she’d say what he wanted instead of actually having a discussion.

Which he had no response for.

He did much the same during the rest of the discussion, ignoring her statements.

That’s called being prepared.
I'm happy for you that you feel that woman crushed Charlie. Good for you.
 
I've watched several videos of Kirk's "conversations" over the last few days.

They are the standard "I'm 100% right, you're 100% wrong" crap coming from both him and the liberal.

That's a debate, not a conversation. Nothing constructive is created in debates like that. No common ground or new ideas come from that. Kirk was just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Both ends have plenty of them.
I'm sure you've watched several cherry-picked videos no doubt carved down to just the sound byte your Leftist Masters want you to see. And of course Google Search cherry picks and stacks search string hits in exactly the same way.
 
I'm happy for you that you feel that woman crushed Charlie. Good for you.

She certainly appeared smarter, better prepared and quicker witted than he was.

That theme repeats during the discussion.

Of course you don’t see any problem with just ignoring what the other side says, because you’re not interested in discussion. It’s a performance.
 
Here's an idea. Seek out the moderates, because believe it or not, there are. Don't broad-brush the left for its extremist wing. We had enough of them doing that to us.
Democrat moderates defend and give cover to the extremists in their party. The moderates even try to convince everyone that all these assassins who go after conservatives are Trump supporters.

Terrorism flourishes in the Middle East specifically BECAUSE the moderates make excuses for their radical terrorists. Moderates play a massively important role in societies. If the moderates are morally bankrupt, then that entire society becomes morally bankrupt.
 
Last edited:
She certainly appeared smarter, better prepared and quicker witted than he was.

That theme repeats during the discussion.

Of course you don’t see any problem with just ignoring what the other side says, because you’re not interested in discussion. It’s a performance.
I said, I'm happy for you that you feel that woman crushed Charlie. Want to keep repeating how much of a poopy head Charlie and I are and how much superior you are? It's a real good look. One you wear regularly
 
15th post
Qualifications are irrelevant? Are you sure you’re not a DEI hire?

Not true.

jennifer-lawrence-ok.gif


Yeah see, this is the problem.

He called her a DEI hire meaning that he--Kirk--is only considering her race and gender.

If you look at the qualifications--which is all you should look at (outside of background checks and that sort of thing) when hiring someone--she had what you even admitted was an “impressive resume”. You take her qualifications and put them on a white piece of paper next to the current VP for example, there is no question about her superiority to Vance.

Her resume was absolutely superior to Vance's, especially her superior romantic dalliance with the Speaker of the California State Assembly, who launched her political career by appointing her to two California state commissions—the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board and the California Medical Assistance Commission, which ultimately set the stage for her to make connections with wealthy San Francisco donors and assisted with her successful 2003 campaign for San Francisco District Attorney.
 
I said, I'm happy for you that you feel that woman crushed Charlie. Want to keep repeating how much of a poopy head Charlie and I are and how much superior you are? It's a real good look. One you wear regularly

I explained my point. You chose to ignore it.

This is how “debates” go with the terminal right.
 
I repeat what else in the news right now? The REAL news I mean not the fake news.
What is "fake" about the Epstein files? Even Charlie Kirk demanded that the Trump Administration release the full, unredacted files.
Are you trying to say Saint Charlie was full of shit now?
 
Back
Top Bottom