Let's have a conversation

Anyways, my point is we need to get our country back to being peaceful and can we really do that if we're always at war with each other? Legitimate question folks.
If you're a dime-a-dozen god botherer who can't keep their personal beliefs personal, you're perpetuating the 'war'. Appeals to emotion are lazy and largely ineffectual in the face of fact.
 
Imagine responding to your empty accusations and claims that way.

I specifically brought up the facts supporting what I've said.

You you can't refute it, you don't have any honesty to admit it, so you are down to your usual content free flaming bullshit.
 
Christ has unconditional love, I'm just looking for the right answer of how to respond to this. Unfortunately you guys might be right and war might be the answer, but something has just got to happen to restore peace to America.


Fix the states with massive Election fraud. Its 70-30 common sense in Ameriican people. Quit funding 98% Leftist maggots teaching children. They will be silenced. Turn off communist propaganda media, give them no coverage.
 
You and Kirk are demanding others accept your framing of sex and gender.

She did a good job explaining that not everyone does.

If you and Kirk refuse to acknowledge and discuss her point, you’re not actually trying to engage in discussion.

It’s performative. He just wanted to get her to say what he wanted her to say and when she didn’t say it, he said it for her.
QED And your and her confusion on what is a woman leads to the evisceration of feminism and Title 9 and ...
 
If you're a dime-a-dozen god botherer who can't keep their personal beliefs personal, you're perpetuating the 'war'. Appeals to emotion are lazy and largely ineffectual in the face of fact.


Do you rehearse this stuff or does it just come natural to you to spew it out?
 
I specifically brought up the facts supporting what I've said.

You you can't refute it, you don't have any honesty to admit it, so you are down to your usual content free flaming bullshit.
He’s dumb.
 
I've watched several videos of Kirk's "conversations" over the last few days.

They are the standard "I'm 100% right, you're 100% wrong" crap coming from both him and the liberal.

That's a debate, not a conversation. Nothing constructive is created in debates like that. No common ground or new ideas come from that. Kirk was just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Both ends have plenty of them.
It is his event, his forum, his venue. These youngsters with heads full of mush are invited to approach him and do their best to convince him he is wrong about this or that or whatever. Charlie has facts, figures, logic, reason, civil discourse to counter them. His style is conversational, nonjudgmental, not angry, not accusatory. But he talks common sense.

It may not be obvious in the video clip, but I can't imagine that they don't go away at least thinking about what he said. I suspect he has done more to educate young people than any other figure of this generation.

I myself after hearing a convincing argument contrary to what it had chosen to believe, I thought about it for awhile and had to admit I had not thought it all the way through and was in error.

But having a conversation doesn't mean agreement or capitulation to the leftist. :)
 
QED And your and her confusion on what is a woman leads to the evisceration of feminism and Title 9 and ...

We aren’t confused at all.

I see exactly what you’re doing and it’s not an attempt to engage in discussion.
 
He was from the left and had left a message somewhere saying "catch fascist."
And?

You've got have just a drop of objectivity.

OBJECTIVELY there have been lefty and righty shooters.

You should probably keep that in mind when talking about this instead of hacking just one way.

You effectively brush aside violent rightwing extremists and say right has nothing to do with that....and then turn right around and blame all of left as soon as some degenerate lefty does something violent.
 
And?

You've got have just a drop of objectivity.

OBJECTIVELY there have been lefty and righty shooters.

You should probably keep that in mind when talking about this instead of hacking just one way.

You effectively brush aside violent rightwing extremists and say "right has nothing to do with that" and then turn right around and blame all of left as soon as someone on the left does something violent.


Anybody who's a true Republican never incites violence. I'm not referring to RINOS.
 
I agree and btw I quoted the wrong video of yours but I did love your video of Charlie Kirk talking about how sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind when you love somebody. It is truly sad how people are being slaughtered just for voicing their opinion in this country today though. Christ's return is near.
it's called tough love.
 
And?

You've got have just a drop of objectivity.

OBJECTIVELY there have been lefty and righty shooters.

You should probably keep that in mind when talking about this instead of hacking just one way.

You effectively brush aside violent rightwing extremists and say right has nothing to do with that....and then turn right around and blame all of left as soon as some degenerate lefty does something violent.
well name where their violence exists.
 
I know, I was trying, too few frames
If this doesn't convince you that he's wearing the backpack and that the gun is wrapped in the dark towel? It does convince me and I can't improve it any further.

 
Last edited:
There is no discussion. Once your opinion, that men can be women, is accepted there is no such thing as feminism. It's dead.

There’s no discussion because you refuse to discuss why we can’t have a distinction between biological sex and sociological gender.

Kirk wouldn’t touch it, he just pretended that she didn’t bring this up.

When you demand someone accepts your dogmatic framing of a topic, the discussion is dead.
 
15th post
For those on the left who insist on having a 'conversation' about hot-button issues--remember that's all Charlie Kirk wanted to do.

"Let's have a conversation."

Charlie Kirk wanted to 'have a conversation,' and he got shot dead for it. Is it a conversation you want, or something else? Say, maybe, total capitulation to your own views of the world?

Think about that for a minute. Please.
The lesson learned the past week is as clear as a Liberty
Bell being rung.Todays Left LIVES to name call and provoke
a response with flat out lies about our President and
MAGA.Like every day now.Numerous times a day.
This isn't just ransom shit talk the left and Democrats
alike use.It's baked into their Hate on the Right cake.
With asswipes like MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell
never saying a kind word about Trump.He starts off
each 10 pm weeknight show with the Word Trump.
Never a kind word.Thinks using some conflated past
american history and how other Presidents and Congress
acted.
O'Donnell was being used by Biden for just this purpose.
To constantly Lie about Trump.I think O'Donnell was even
hiding in some undisclosed bunker so no one could
walk up to him and ask for context or what he said.
He admitted he had access to Biden at the White House
every so often.Meaning he was used to Help prop-up
Biden when he was caught Lying { almost weekly }.
 
There is no discussion. Once your opinion, that men can be women, is accepted there is no such thing as feminism. It's dead.
well there is no way. mentally ill people are merely mentally ill. When one doesn't have the parts, one cannot be the opposite of that which they are. I would ask any demofk how the fk any man could have feelings like a woman's menstrual cycle or cramps. Stop fking insulting the women.
 
There’s no discussion because you refuse to discuss why we can’t have a distinction between biological sex and sociological gender.

Kirk wouldn’t touch it, he just pretended that she didn’t bring this up.

When you demand someone accepts your dogmatic framing of a topic, the discussion is dead.
No demand, but what is there to discuss about feminism if your belief is that men can be women and women and be men? Again, such a belief literally eviscerates Title 9 that feminists fought decades to have passed?
 
I've watched several videos of Kirk's "conversations" over the last few days.

They are the standard "I'm 100% right, you're 100% wrong" crap coming from both him and the liberal.

That's a debate, not a conversation. Nothing constructive is created in debates like that. No common ground or new ideas come from that. Kirk was just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Both ends have plenty of them.
large-round-gold-scalloped-wall-mirror-90cm-x-90cm_MM33500-01.jpg

*Insert yourself in front of that.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom