jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 158,256
- 38,934
- 2,180
what other genders are there but two? show me.You and Kirk are demanding others accept your framing of sex and gender.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what other genders are there but two? show me.You and Kirk are demanding others accept your framing of sex and gender.
If you're a dime-a-dozen god botherer who can't keep their personal beliefs personal, you're perpetuating the 'war'. Appeals to emotion are lazy and largely ineffectual in the face of fact.Anyways, my point is we need to get our country back to being peaceful and can we really do that if we're always at war with each other? Legitimate question folks.
Imagine responding to your empty accusations and claims that way.
Christ has unconditional love, I'm just looking for the right answer of how to respond to this. Unfortunately you guys might be right and war might be the answer, but something has just got to happen to restore peace to America.
QED And your and her confusion on what is a woman leads to the evisceration of feminism and Title 9 and ...You and Kirk are demanding others accept your framing of sex and gender.
She did a good job explaining that not everyone does.
If you and Kirk refuse to acknowledge and discuss her point, you’re not actually trying to engage in discussion.
It’s performative. He just wanted to get her to say what he wanted her to say and when she didn’t say it, he said it for her.
If you're a dime-a-dozen god botherer who can't keep their personal beliefs personal, you're perpetuating the 'war'. Appeals to emotion are lazy and largely ineffectual in the face of fact.
He’s dumb.I specifically brought up the facts supporting what I've said.
You you can't refute it, you don't have any honesty to admit it, so you are down to your usual content free flaming bullshit.
It is his event, his forum, his venue. These youngsters with heads full of mush are invited to approach him and do their best to convince him he is wrong about this or that or whatever. Charlie has facts, figures, logic, reason, civil discourse to counter them. His style is conversational, nonjudgmental, not angry, not accusatory. But he talks common sense.I've watched several videos of Kirk's "conversations" over the last few days.
They are the standard "I'm 100% right, you're 100% wrong" crap coming from both him and the liberal.
That's a debate, not a conversation. Nothing constructive is created in debates like that. No common ground or new ideas come from that. Kirk was just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Both ends have plenty of them.
QED And your and her confusion on what is a woman leads to the evisceration of feminism and Title 9 and ...
And?He was from the left and had left a message somewhere saying "catch fascist."
And?
You've got have just a drop of objectivity.
OBJECTIVELY there have been lefty and righty shooters.
You should probably keep that in mind when talking about this instead of hacking just one way.
You effectively brush aside violent rightwing extremists and say "right has nothing to do with that" and then turn right around and blame all of left as soon as someone on the left does something violent.
There is no discussion. Once your opinion, that men can be women, is accepted there is no such thing as feminism. It's dead.We aren’t confused at all.
I see exactly what you’re doing and it’s not an attempt to engage in discussion.
it's called tough love.I agree and btw I quoted the wrong video of yours but I did love your video of Charlie Kirk talking about how sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind when you love somebody. It is truly sad how people are being slaughtered just for voicing their opinion in this country today though. Christ's return is near.
well name where their violence exists.And?
You've got have just a drop of objectivity.
OBJECTIVELY there have been lefty and righty shooters.
You should probably keep that in mind when talking about this instead of hacking just one way.
You effectively brush aside violent rightwing extremists and say right has nothing to do with that....and then turn right around and blame all of left as soon as some degenerate lefty does something violent.
If this doesn't convince you that he's wearing the backpack and that the gun is wrapped in the dark towel? It does convince me and I can't improve it any further.I know, I was trying, too few frames
There is no discussion. Once your opinion, that men can be women, is accepted there is no such thing as feminism. It's dead.
The lesson learned the past week is as clear as a LibertyFor those on the left who insist on having a 'conversation' about hot-button issues--remember that's all Charlie Kirk wanted to do.
"Let's have a conversation."
Charlie Kirk wanted to 'have a conversation,' and he got shot dead for it. Is it a conversation you want, or something else? Say, maybe, total capitulation to your own views of the world?
Think about that for a minute. Please.
well there is no way. mentally ill people are merely mentally ill. When one doesn't have the parts, one cannot be the opposite of that which they are. I would ask any demofk how the fk any man could have feelings like a woman's menstrual cycle or cramps. Stop fking insulting the women.There is no discussion. Once your opinion, that men can be women, is accepted there is no such thing as feminism. It's dead.
No demand, but what is there to discuss about feminism if your belief is that men can be women and women and be men? Again, such a belief literally eviscerates Title 9 that feminists fought decades to have passed?There’s no discussion because you refuse to discuss why we can’t have a distinction between biological sex and sociological gender.
Kirk wouldn’t touch it, he just pretended that she didn’t bring this up.
When you demand someone accepts your dogmatic framing of a topic, the discussion is dead.
I've watched several videos of Kirk's "conversations" over the last few days.
They are the standard "I'm 100% right, you're 100% wrong" crap coming from both him and the liberal.
That's a debate, not a conversation. Nothing constructive is created in debates like that. No common ground or new ideas come from that. Kirk was just another hardcore partisan ideologue. Both ends have plenty of them.