Letitia James receives SUBPOENA from the DOJ for violating President Trumps' civil rights.

[Marener]

No, once again, congress passed a law to allow agencies within the federal government to make their own rules and regulations, this law led to the CFR, which has provisions in it that allow the AG to appoint inferior officers.

The CFR is legally binding because IT is congressionally approved by the Administrative Procedure Act.

The cotus says that congress can vest, by law, department heads the authority to appoint inferior officers. Congress created the APA laq which gave departments the authority to create their own rules. These rules are outlined in the CFR. This CFR, which was created by the law passed by congress, allows the AG to appoint inferior officers.

So, rather than congress making a law that says "you are allowed to create inferior officers", they made a law that says "you can create your own rules and regulations", it is within these rules and regulations that gave the AG the congressional authority to appoint inferior officers.

If this is not accurate, then jack smith and a whole host of other rules and regulations need to go away.

The DoJ cannot make any rule it wants to. Any rule they make has to have statutory authority.

Congress did not give the DoJ the authority to invent offices to fill with special prosecutors.

 

[Marener]

Hahab sure dembot

Okay.

 

[Rawley]

Cannon’s decision talks about the law.

Goose/gander

But you consider her a "hack" Why would you cite her as authority?

 

[Marener]

But you consider her a "hack" Why would you cite her as authority?

Because goose/gander.

 

[Rawley]

Congress can grant the AG the ability to appoint an inferior officer but has not done so.

The constitution says:
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

Which is what they did in 28 USC 515

 

[Marener]

Which is what they did in 28 USC 515

Nope. That section does not give them the authority to create offices. It just says what those appointed to offices can do.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Which is what they did in 28 USC 515

you know he's only going to lie to you, right?

 

[struth]

Because goose/gander.

She is an authority. She did say what the law was

you just either didn’t read her opinion or are too stupid to comprehend it and how it isn’t at all at issue with the NY attorney

 

[Rawley]

Nope. That section does not give them the authority to create offices. It just says what those appointed to offices can do.

Interesting that you are now agreeing that Jack Smith had no authority to prosecute Trump.

you know he's only going to lie to you, right?

Funny that he's relying on Cannon's opinion.

 

[Marener]

She is an authority. She did say what the law was

you just either didn’t read her opinion or are too stupid to comprehend it and how it isn’t at all at issue with the NY attorney

You mad?

 

[Marener]

Interesting that you are now agreeing that Jack Smith had no authority to prosecute Trump.

Goose/gander

 

[Marener]

you know he's only going to lie to you, right?

Did Aileen Cannon lie?

 

[struth]

You mad?

Mad you embarrassed yourself again? No

Not at all. Par for the course

 

[Blisterfinger]

Aileen Cannon said that.

Goose/gander.

So if Trump is doing the same thing that Biden did (an illegal unethical act) then Trump is a hypocrite? That's what YOU said.

 

[Marener]

Mad you embarrassed yourself again? No

Not at all. Par for the course

Okay.

 

[Marener]

So if Trump is doing the same thing that Biden did (an illegal unethical act) then Trump is a hypocrite? That's what YOU said.

Trump is doing the thing that he stated was unconstitutional.

 

[struth]

Trump is doing the thing that he stated was unconstitutional.

As highlights in Cannon’s opinion

No he’s not

Hahaha

 

[Marener]

As highlights in Cannon’s opinion

No he’s not

Hahaha

He is.

 

[struth]

He is.

Hahha so embarrassed for you

 

[Marener]

Hahha so embarrassed for you

Gotcha.