Letitia James receives SUBPOENA from the DOJ for violating President Trumps' civil rights.

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Yes, you are, and we all know it!

 

[Marener]

So you're saying Jack Smith was illegal and unethical?

Aileen Cannon said that.

Goose/gander.

 

[Marener]

Post the law saying it’s not binding…show the law undoing the CFR

CFR isn’t law. I can’t believe you didn’t know that.

 

[struth]

CFR isn’t law. I can’t believe you didn’t know that.

Of course it is

What do you think the definition of law is?

 

[MagicMike]

Let's go!!! Justice is coming for AG James. Her Stalinist attempt to destroy Donald Trump is finally going to get full scrutiny. This is in addition to the investigation into her miraculous rise in net worth through crooked real estate deals.

NY AG Letitia James subpoenaed by Justice Department over $454M civil fraud case against Trump

James was hit with subpoenas as part of a grand jury probe by the Albany US Attorney’s Office into her office’s $454 million civil fraud case against President Trump.

nypost.com

Yawn.
Just another example of the incompetent, orange, shit stain trying to claim he has some constitutional right to commit crimes.
It's another nothingburger noise maker to distract the MAGAt simpletons from his current train wreck of an administration.
This, like all the others, will only make a bunch of noise for a little while and get the dullard MAGAts all waiting with baited breath for the hammer to finally drop on the pedophile in chief's political enemies once and for all...and then when it fizzles out and (again) turns out to be a big, giant nothing he'll throw out the next distraction to make you all forget how long you sat around waiting for the last "big one."
Rinse and repeat.
Once again Trump doesn't even have a real case here.

 

[Marener]

The AG is allowed to appoint inferior officers based off the rule making process which was approved by congress

No, that’s incorrect. Congress did not authorize the attorney general to create offices.

This isn’t about rule creation. It’s about creating an entire office which the constitution says that Congress has to do.

You’re claiming that a department can make a rule to override the constitution, which is silly.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

She should claim sovereign immunity and litigate it to the supreme court

There is no sovereign immunity for criminal conduct.

 

[Marener]

Of course it is

Nope.

 

[struth]

Nope.

Yep. Again you just can’t help embarrassing yourself

You don’t even know the definition of law

 

[Marener]

You don’t even know the definition of law

I do.

 

[struth]

I do.

Then tell us…

 

[Marener]

Then tell us…

Us? How many people do you speak for?

 

[Nostra]

Us? How many people do you speak for?

How many do you think are on this site, Dipshit??

 

[Marener]

How many do you think are on this site, Dipshit??

Lots.

 

[struth]

Us? How many people do you speak for?

Those of us on this board engaging with you, we want to know what your definition is…

 

[Marener]

Those of us on this board engaging with you, we want to know what your definition is…

I want a pony.

 

[struth]

I want a pony.

Gotcha we get it, you can’t define it, once again, exposed for being out of your league

 

[Marener]

Gotcha we get it, you can’t define it, once again, exposed for being out of your league

I sure can.

 

[ThisIsMe]

No, that’s incorrect. Congress did not authorize the attorney general to create offices.

This isn’t about rule creation. It’s about creating an entire office which the constitution says that Congress has to do.

You’re claiming that a department can make a rule to override the constitution, which is silly.

No, once again, congress passed a law to allow agencies within the federal government to make their own rules and regulations, this law led to the CFR, which has provisions in it that allow the AG to appoint inferior officers.

The CFR is legally binding because IT is congressionally approved by the Administrative Procedure Act.

The cotus says that congress can vest, by law, department heads the authority to appoint inferior officers. Congress created the APA laq which gave departments the authority to create their own rules. These rules are outlined in the CFR. This CFR, which was created by the law passed by congress, allows the AG to appoint inferior officers.

So, rather than congress making a law that says "you are allowed to create inferior officers", they made a law that says "you can create your own rules and regulations", it is within these rules and regulations that gave the AG the congressional authority to appoint inferior officers.

If this is not accurate, then jack smith and a whole host of other rules and regulations need to go away.

 

[struth]

I sure can.

Hahab sure dembot