Letitia James receives SUBPOENA from the DOJ for violating President Trumps' civil rights.

[struth]

You’re wrong.

Nope you didn’t read the actual opinion or know the facts

Once again you are exposed as an idiot, acting way out of his league

 

[Marener]

Nope you didn’t read the actual opinion or know the facts

Once again you are exposed as an idiot, acting way out of his league

You didn’t read the opinion.

 

[Marener]

Exactly. You Just posted my argument.



This is saying that congress can pass laws that allow the president, the courts, or department heads, to appoint inferior officers without advice and consent, which they did, in the law that I linked

You linked to the CFR which is not law.

 

[ThisIsMe]

You linked to the CFR which is not law.

But it is law, because the CFR is part of the "rulemaking" process, which congress grants authority to departments to make its own rules. In this case, part of those rules is allowing the AG to appoint inferior officers

 

[Marener]

But it is law, because the CFR is part of the "rulemaking" process, which congress grants authority to departments to make its own rules. In this case, part of those rules is allowing the AG to appoint inferior officers

CFR is not law.

Nothing in the CFR had any authority unless specifically authorized by law.

And there is no such law.

 

[struth]

You didn’t read the opinion.

Of course I didn, hence why I was able to explain why you were wrong

 

[Marener]

Of course I didn, hence why I was able to explain why you were wrong

No you didn’t.

 

[struth]

No you didn’t.

Haha poor Marener gets totally owned once again

 

[Marener]

Haha poor Marener gets totally owned once again

Nope.

 

[struth]

Nope.

How embarrassing for you

 

[Marener]

How embarrassing for you

Nope.

 

[ThisIsMe]

CFR is not law.

Nothing in the CFR had any authority unless specifically authorized by law.

And there is no such law.

But the CFR is a part of congressional authority to allow departments to make their own rules.

CFR is legally binding.


Also:

Administrative Procedure Act

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[Marener]

But the CFR is a part of congressional authority to allow departments to make their own rules.

CFR is legally binding.


Also:

Administrative Procedure Act

www.law.cornell.edu

If Congress gave the authority to DoJ to appoint special prosecutors, you’d be posting the law.

The CFR is not a law. It is not legally binding if there is now law underpinning the regulation.

All you have to do is find the law.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Yeah good luck with that. The DOJ has no control over James. She can tell the DOJ to go **** themselves with impunity.

See? All you do is lie.
What do you think happens when you refuse to respond to a DoJ subpoenas, and why?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Trump is abusing his power by using the power of the federal government to commence a bogus investigation into a civil case that he lost.

This is you repeating your claim, not demonstrating it to be true.
Try again.

 

[Blisterfinger]

That’s the argument Trump made about Jack Smith but then goes and does the exact same thing.

Seems hypocritical, isn’t it?

So you're saying Jack Smith was illegal and unethical?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

This will be awesome. She can force Trump officials and NRA officials to bear witness and rehash why they lost. When they all start pleading the Fifth it will look like a circus. She could run for higher office on this. Awesomesauce!

WTF does the NRA have to do with Trump's business dealings?

You should seek help for that TDS because I think your brain is rotting to the core!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Can you imagine her calling Wayne "I paid for my escort's apartment out of NRA funds" LaPierre to the stand. Juicy!

Quoting your own post? Slipping a gear?

What does he have to do with Trump's businesses?

 

[ThisIsMe]

If Congress gave the authority to DoJ to appoint special prosecutors, you’d be posting the law.

The CFR is not a law. It is not legally binding if there is now law underpinning the regulation.

All you have to do is find the law.

Ive already explained it. The AG is allowed to appoint inferior officers based off the rule making process which was approved by congress, that gives department heads the authority to make their own rules, which is compiled in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) which is legally binding .

 

[struth]

If Congress gave the authority to DoJ to appoint special prosecutors, you’d be posting the law.

The CFR is not a law. It is not legally binding if there is now law underpinning the regulation.

All you have to do is find the law.

Post the law saying it’s not binding…show the law undoing the CFR