It wasn't just Republicans that authorized those invasions.Sorry Marty..
But I have to laugh at Republicans who authorized US invasions of Kuwait, Afghanistan and Iraq but are now outraged over the U.S. aid to Ukraine with NO US TROOPS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It wasn't just Republicans that authorized those invasions.Sorry Marty..
But I have to laugh at Republicans who authorized US invasions of Kuwait, Afghanistan and Iraq but are now outraged over the U.S. aid to Ukraine with NO US TROOPS
We invaded Kuwait to give them back their country after Iraq had invaded them. Do you know how much fighting Kuwait actually did while their leaders and the wealthy took refuge in Europe and Arab countries. After the US won their country for them, they came back.When did we invade Kuwait?
In the 1990 gulf war the goal was to expel Iraq from Kuwait. It worked.
In Iraq and Afghanistan 2002/2023 it was to establish stable friendly governments. It didn't work.
In Ukraine, Ukraine wants Donbas and Crimea back, and Russia want's them for themselves. Are we 100% in on Ukraine's goal?
All were at the request of a Republican President and supported almost unanimously by RepublicansIt wasn't just Republicans that authorized those invasions.
We invaded Kuwait to give them back their country after Iraq had invaded them. Do you know how much fighting Kuwait actually did while their leaders and the wealthy took refuge in Europe and Arab countries. After the US won their country for them, they came back.
Ukraine is doing their own fighting for freedom against an unprovoked invader. For the first time in 70 years, the US is staying out of it and just sending aid.
Republicans unilaterally supported the first case while opposing the second.
Why?
Because a Republican authorized the invasion of Kuwait while a Democrat authorized aid to Ukraine.
All were at the request of a Republican President and supported almost unanimously by Republicans
And by democrats. They got on board too, Hillary being a classic example.All were at the request of a Republican President and supported almost unanimously by Republicans
I don't know how else to take what you wrote other than a condemnation of giving RFK vast authority to reform our healthcare system.I argued with an anti-vaxxer once and my IQ went down just reading some of the things he/she/it said. Vaccines are perhaps the greatest advancement in the field of medicine we've seen and have saved untold numbers of lives. That being said, however, we do have to consider the long-term effects of loading up babies with a dozen or more shots within the first few months of life and make sure we're doing it as safely as possible. And, as always, people need to do their own research, not just blindly accept the "experts'" word for it.
Most progressives believe that if we just keep on adding to the debt, the economy will always grow and that you never have to pay back the principal, only the interest. It's a slot machine that pays off all the time and never breaks, even though the interest on the debt is now the biggest expense we have. And, somehow, I don't know how, they ignore the fact that massive debt brings on hyperinflation. But, even then we don't have to worry because we can just raise interest rates as high as we want to bring the hyperinflation back down. And the bubble never bursts and the slot machine keeps on paying off.Fools close their eyes and pretend we can just keep piling on debt forever with no negative consequences. Politicians hope they can retire before being blamed for the coming crash. Harris has no plan to soften the inevitable crash and doesn't even want to address it (I don't think she has the mental capacity to even realize it's coming).
I would oppose attempts to eliminate vaccines, and I don't believe he would be able to do much about that because doctors are not going to fall into line opposing vaccines. There are questions about them that deserve to be investigated, as in are they possibly causing some problems that are not being attributed to them, but they help so much more than harm that we can't do away with them. That being said, I'm not a real fan of the guys in charge right now either.I don't know how else to take what you wrote other than a condemnation of giving RFK vast authority to reform our healthcare system.
Dem's regretful authorization of Shrub's military action in Iraq (he made the final decision in spite of UN inspectors reporting there was no active WMD program) was based on lies the admin told.It wasn't just Republicans that authorized those invasions.
No concern for the kids whose parents are convinced vaccines are harmful because of RFK's reckless, baseless, assertions?I would oppose attempts to eliminate vaccines, and I don't believe he would be able to do much about that because doctors are not going to fall into line opposing vaccines.
They had the security clearances to ensure they were getting the straight info or not. Are you excusing just democrats in this or everyone involved? IOW, was W lied to by the alphabet agencies as well, or is it just more convenient to blame him?Dem's regretful authorization of Shrub's military action in Iraq (he made the final decision in spite of UN inspectors reporting there was no active WMD program) was based on lies the admin told.
I don't think we really need a nation's doctor in the first place, it's far too political an appointment, and as we saw in Covid, leads to his/her pronouncements used to force people to get in line.No concern for the kids whose parents are convinced vaccines are harmful because of RFK's reckless, baseless, assertions?
No concern for the kids whose parents are convinced vaccines are harmful because of RFK's reckless, baseless, assertions?Last ditch effort by the left predicting "massive consequences" to scare the elderly folks. They forget that the democrat Governor of NY killed hundreds of old folks with an E.O. Democrats don't give damn about health care. All they think about is political power.
Not the Kennedy's, RFK. Who is not supported by Kennedy's.RFK Jr. supports Trump and the left suddenly thinks the Kennedy's are poison.
You're not even wrong.No matter what democrats say, it won't be true. It won't even have a passing acknowledgement of truth.