Let me see if I have this right.

[shockedcanadian]

So.......when you can't deal with the facts, project your faults on to others.

I support policies not politicians.

Whoever wins, wins. I will support them and pray their policies make sense to ensure America remains solvent and the gloval leader.

 

[ZestolPastilevsky]

When the shoe fits....................................

Don't put shoes in there.

 

[berg80]

He tried to do it by boosting the economy, but Congress will always just spend more.

Congress's fault? Which party controlled Congress during his first two years?

 

[Mac-7]

If trump is elected he's going to have RFK Jr. "go wild" on the US healthcare system.

Trump says he would let RFK Jr. 'go wild on medicines'
https://www.politico.com/video/2024...would-let-rfk-jr-go-wild-on-medicines-1466853

For the most part, Donald Trump has been mum on who he’d appoint to his administration if he wins.
But he has made one pretty clear promise: Trump has said he’ll let conspiracy theorist and vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr. “go wild” on health, food, and drug regulation. That could have massive consequences for public health and vaccine policy in America. If Kennedy were to completely get his way and deter vaccination, vaccine-preventable diseases like measles and polio could make a comeback.
Trump really could empower RFK Jr. to wreck public health

Elon Musk, trump's future budget czar, says the country needs to brace for hardship, a metaphor for the economy needing to be crashed.

Elon Musk asks voters to brace for economic 'hardship,' deep spending cuts in potential Trump Cabinet role

“We have to reduce spending to live within our means,” Musk said. “And, you know, that necessarily involves some temporary hardship, but it will ensure long-term prosperity.”

Many economists agree that Trump’s economic and fiscal proposals could spark an economic calamity, though it is not clear whether they have considered, or given credence, to Musk’s calls for austerity.
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/ec...-could-mean-hardship-for-americans-rcna177807

And the Orange Menace plans to suspend the constitutional rights of journalists and those suspected of breaking the law by prosecuting media critics and allowing law enforcement to really rough up criminals in retaliation for what they've done or accused of doing.

Trump says ‘violent day’ of policing will end crime
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/29/trump-violent-day-policing-crime-00181619

New Trump admin would try to prosecute journalists, former Trump adviser says
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/06/politics/kash-patel-trump-administration/index.html

If protests break out over journalists being jailed or economic "hardship" he's prepared to use the military to deal with it.

Trump suggests he’ll use the military on ‘the enemy from within’ the U.S. if he’s reelected
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politi...he-enemy-from-within-the-u-s-if-hes-reelected

During his first term as president, Donald Trump tested the limits of how he could use the military to achieve policy goals. If given a second term, the Republican and his allies are preparing to go much further, reimagining the military as an all-powerful tool to deploy on U.S. soil.

He has pledged to recall thousands of American troops from overseas and station them at the U.S. border with Mexico. He has explored using troops for domestic policy priorities such as deportations and confronting civil unrest. He has talked of weeding out military officers who are ideologically opposed to him.

Trump’s vision amounts to a potentially dramatic shift in the role of the military in U.S. society, carrying grave implications for both the country’s place in the world and the restraints that have traditionally been placed on domestic use of the military.
I find all this to be suboptimal. For trump supporters, it seems they have a choice to make. Vote for what he has promised, or believe he's lying about it.

Begging the question, if he's lying, if he doesn't plan on doing the things he says he is, what is his motivation for saying them?

Can trump supporters see why some Americans reject his vision for the next 4 years?

You keep posting the same old crap every day as if were something new

But RFK jr is fairly recent

What is trump talking about when he says let kennedy go wild on healthcare?

Thats a tooic of great interest to kennedy and some of his ideas are not popular with the lib establishment

To them he is a loose cannon and he was driven out of the democrat party because he does not support obsmacare

But hardly anyone is happy with our healthcare system that exists now

So why not try something new?

 

[rightwinger]

I guess the OP prefers four more years of paying for a war we have no vested interest in, inflation, and open borders.....Is it any wonder I consider his type to be evil?

We have a vested interest in Ukraine. More so than Afghanistan and Iraq that Republicans unanimously supported.
Inflation is below 4 percent
It was Republicans who opposed immigration reform

 

[berg80]

I support policies not politicians.

Whoever wins, wins. I will support them and pray their policies make sense to ensure America remains solvent and the gloval leader.

Policies like arresting journalists who are critical of the prez?

 

[hadit]

Congress's fault? Which party controlled Congress during his first two years?

I'm talking about Congress as a whole over time. With the exception of Newt Gingrich's, they have steadfastly refused to hold the line on the budget. It doesn't matter who's in charge.

 

[berg80]

Thats a tooic of great interest to kennedy and some of his ideas are not popular with the lib establishment

Actually, his ideas are not popular with medical experts, like doctors who went to school to learn about treating patients.

 

[Rawley]

If trump is elected he's going to have RFK Jr. "go wild" on the US healthcare system.

Trump says he would let RFK Jr. 'go wild on medicines'
https://www.politico.com/video/2024...would-let-rfk-jr-go-wild-on-medicines-1466853

For the most part, Donald Trump has been mum on who he’d appoint to his administration if he wins.
But he has made one pretty clear promise: Trump has said he’ll let conspiracy theorist and vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr. “go wild” on health, food, and drug regulation. That could have massive consequences for public health and vaccine policy in America. If Kennedy were to completely get his way and deter vaccination, vaccine-preventable diseases like measles and polio could make a comeback.
Trump really could empower RFK Jr. to wreck public health

Elon Musk, trump's future budget czar, says the country needs to brace for hardship, a metaphor for the economy needing to be crashed.

Elon Musk asks voters to brace for economic 'hardship,' deep spending cuts in potential Trump Cabinet role

“We have to reduce spending to live within our means,” Musk said. “And, you know, that necessarily involves some temporary hardship, but it will ensure long-term prosperity.”

Many economists agree that Trump’s economic and fiscal proposals could spark an economic calamity, though it is not clear whether they have considered, or given credence, to Musk’s calls for austerity.
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/ec...-could-mean-hardship-for-americans-rcna177807

And the Orange Menace plans to suspend the constitutional rights of journalists and those suspected of breaking the law by prosecuting media critics and allowing law enforcement to really rough up criminals in retaliation for what they've done or accused of doing.

Trump says ‘violent day’ of policing will end crime
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/29/trump-violent-day-policing-crime-00181619

New Trump admin would try to prosecute journalists, former Trump adviser says
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/06/politics/kash-patel-trump-administration/index.html

If protests break out over journalists being jailed or economic "hardship" he's prepared to use the military to deal with it.

Trump suggests he’ll use the military on ‘the enemy from within’ the U.S. if he’s reelected
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politi...he-enemy-from-within-the-u-s-if-hes-reelected

During his first term as president, Donald Trump tested the limits of how he could use the military to achieve policy goals. If given a second term, the Republican and his allies are preparing to go much further, reimagining the military as an all-powerful tool to deploy on U.S. soil.

He has pledged to recall thousands of American troops from overseas and station them at the U.S. border with Mexico. He has explored using troops for domestic policy priorities such as deportations and confronting civil unrest. He has talked of weeding out military officers who are ideologically opposed to him.

Trump’s vision amounts to a potentially dramatic shift in the role of the military in U.S. society, carrying grave implications for both the country’s place in the world and the restraints that have traditionally been placed on domestic use of the military.
I find all this to be suboptimal. For trump supporters, it seems they have a choice to make. Vote for what he has promised, or believe he's lying about it.

Begging the question, if he's lying, if he doesn't plan on doing the things he says he is, what is his motivation for saying them?

Can trump supporters see why some Americans reject his vision for the next 4 years?

Feel better?

 

[Rawley]

We have a vested interest in Ukraine. More so than Afghanistan and Iraq that Republicans unanimously supported.
Inflation is below 4 percent
It was Republicans who opposed immigration reform

HR2 dude.

 

[Mac-7]

You keep posting the same old crap every day as if were something new

But RFK jr is fairly recent

What is trump talking about when he says let kennedy go wild on healthcare?

Thats a tooic of great interest to kennedy and some of his ideas are not popular with the lib establishment

To them he is a loose cannon and he was driven out of the democrat party because he does not support obsmacare

But hardly no one is happy with our healthcare system that exists now

So why not try something new?

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/30/health/rfk-jr-health-policy/index.html

 

[berg80]

I'm talking about Congress as a whole over time. With the exception of Newt Gingrich's, they have steadfastly refused to hold the line on the budget. It doesn't matter who's in charge.

As we have seen, congressional Repub's toe the line for trump even when he is out of office. The truth is he did nothing to restrain spending when he had the chance because spending helps the economy.

 

[martybegan]

We have a vested interest in Ukraine. More so than Afghanistan and Iraq that Republicans unanimously supported.
Inflation is below 4 percent
It was Republicans who opposed immigration reform

If the Middle East goes to shit, we can probably handle our own Oil demands, but Europe goes to shit.

How does that help the US?

 

[hadit]

As we have seen, congressional Repub's toe the line for trump even when he is out of office. The truth is he did nothing to restrain spending when he had the chance because spending helps the economy.

He did used to be a democrat, after all. Their answer is always more spending.

 

[berg80]

What I'm seeing from trumples so far is a concerted attempt to rationalize voting for an orange ass clown who has promised to turn this constitutional republic on its head. But then maybe you folks like chaos.

 

[martybegan]

What I'm seeing from trumples so far is a concerted attempt to rationalize voting for an orange ass clown who has promised to turn this constitutional republic on its head. But then maybe you folks like chaos.

Actually, try to restore it back to the Constitutional Republic it should be.

 

[Mac-7]

Actually, his ideas are not popular with medical experts, like doctors who went to school to learn about treating patients.

Better, healthier food is a bad idea?

As is reducing obesity in children

The former first black first lady tried to do that too

 

[hadit]

What I'm seeing from trumples so far is a concerted attempt to rationalize voting for an orange ass clown who has promised to turn this constitutional republic on its head. But then maybe you folks like chaos.

What you're seeing is abject horror at the thought of putting Cackles anywhere anyone actually depends on her. Her "leadership" is exactly the kind of chaos this country can't afford.

 

[martybegan]

What you're seeing is abject horror at the thought of putting Cackles anywhere anyone actually depends on her. Her "leadership" is exactly the kind of chaos this country can't afford.

And it likely wouldn't even be her's. It would be the same back room cabal that is pulling Biden's strings currently.

 

[rightwinger]

If the Middle East goes to shit, we can probably handle our own Oil demands, but Europe goes to shit.

How does that help the US?

Because the US has a long standing cultural and economic connection to Europe. Putin invading Ukraine destabilizes the region and is a threat to Europe.

We have no interests in Iraq or Afghanistan and Republicans insisted on invading. Note that the US is just sending aid to Ukraine