Leftists, this teen must be crushed!!!

You are going into "hysterics" now. (Pun intended"

Um, no. Hysterectomy is a term used to define a, you know, hysterectomy. Hysterectomy is spelled differently than bottom surgery which might have clued you in that it involves a different procedure and a different location of the body.

You do realize that part of bottom surgery for FTM transition is removing the uterus, right?

You’re a proponent of transing children so feeding them puberty blockers would be the drugs of choice and action to take. We see that consistently with the left. A child is not “acting up” by simply having questions about biology and boys and girls. So why prescribe puberty blockers and coerce that child toward transing?

Why give little Timmy Ritalin because the teacher can't hold his attention for five minutes?

I defer to the medical experts.

The bottom line problem here is that you don't think that gender dysphoria is a real thing.

If you want to argue that it is overdiagnosed, I might even agree with you, it might be. ADHD clearly is.
 
You are going into "hysterics" now. (Pun intended"



You do realize that part of bottom surgery for FTM transition is removing the uterus, right?



Why give little Timmy Ritalin because the teacher can't hold his attention for five minutes?

I defer to the medical experts.

The bottom line problem here is that you don't think that gender dysphoria is a real thing.

If you want to argue that it is overdiagnosed, I might even agree with you, it might be. ADHD clearly is.
The uterus has a name. That name is “uterus”. If you remove the uterus, the uterus is removed. This shouldn’t be so difficult for you.

Why give little 7 year old Janey or Jonny puberty blockers because they have questions about boys and girls that 7 year olds have? The left has this odd fascination with doping and transing children when children naturally have questions about boys and girls.

The bottom line problem with the left has is seeing children as targets for doping and surgeries that make money. The notion that a 7 year old who is curious about the differences between boys and girls is presumed to be gender dysphoric and therefore is presumed to require puberty blockers is ridiculous.

The left sees gender dysphoria everywhere because they groom children at the earliest age with trans ideology.




You people press this ideology on impressionable children at the youngest age in a campaign of grooming.
 
The uterus has a name. That name is “uterus”. If you remove the uterus, the uterus is removed. This shouldn’t be so difficult for you.

Um, yeah, not sure what your point is... that would still constitute FTM surgery, and this is not being done with minors. Even whiny Chloe Brockman never got that far.

The left sees gender dysphoria everywhere because they groom children at the earliest age with trans ideology.
Good, it means they won't grow up to be a bigot like you are. Hate is learned. it can be unlearned.
 
Um, yeah, not sure what your point is... that would still constitute FTM surgery, and this is not being done with minors. Even whiny Chloe Brockman never got that far.


Good, it means they won't grow up to be a bigot like you are. Hate is learned. it can be unlearned.

Um, no. Bottom surgery, whatever that is, is not a hysterectomy. That’s why a hysterectomy is um, called, um, a hysterectomy.

Angry, self hating leftists have this weird “thing” with grooming children. Doping children as young as 7 years old is acceptable to them. Younger children are likely on the horizon as the profit potential increases.

Yet, it’s petty typical for the groomer left to hurl the bigot™ label. Anyone who questions the leftist groomer agenda is a bigot™.
 
The uterus has a name. That name is “uterus”. If you remove the uterus, the uterus is removed. This shouldn’t be so difficult for you.

Why give little 7 year old Janey or Jonny puberty blockers because they have questions about boys and girls that 7 year olds have? The left has this odd fascination with doping and transing children when children naturally have questions about boys and girls.

The bottom line problem with the left has is seeing children as targets for doping and surgeries that make money. The notion that a 7 year old who is curious about the differences between boys and girls is presumed to be gender dysphoric and therefore is presumed to require puberty blockers is ridiculous.

The left sees gender dysphoria everywhere because they groom children at the earliest age with trans ideology.




You people press this ideology on impressionable children at the youngest age in a campaign of grooming.


I get the feeling Joe remains on puberty blockers.
 
Um, no. Bottom surgery, whatever that is, is not a hysterectomy. That’s why a hysterectomy is um, called, um, a hysterectomy.

Angry, self hating leftists have this weird “thing” with grooming children. Doping children as young as 7 years old is acceptable to them. Younger children are likely on the horizon as the profit potential increases.

Yet, it’s petty typical for the groomer left to hurl the bigot™ label. Anyone who questions the leftist groomer agenda is a bigot™.

Bottom is a term used by gays to describe “the catcher”, if you get my drift?
 
Hey, um, yeah, if you insist you are transgender from the time you are nine until the time you are 16, and then at 17 you change your mind for whatever reason because of the 10 other kinds of listed crazy you are suffering from... um, that's kind of on you.

Again- and I am going to repeat this because you seem to be a little slow.

IF THERE WAS ACTUAL MALPRACTICE HERE, she should collect. If they made the best decision based on the data they had, including patient input, then Brockman has no case.




But we already do that, buddy. Just ask all the Ritalin Zombies who will spend most of their lives working menial jobs because their teachers and parents drugged them instead of actually trying to teach them. Now THAT'S a big business, the ADHD racket!

Now imagine if every kid diagnosed with ADHD comes back and sues his pediatrician because they thought filling him with mind altering drugs ruined his future.


Hey, um, yeah, if you insist you are transgender from the time you are nine until the time you are 16, and then at 17 you change your mind for whatever reason because of the 10 other kinds of listed crazy you are suffering from... um, that's kind of on you.

And those 10 other kinds of crazy is why I cannot see how you don’t understand that this should have never happened.

IF THERE WAS ACTUAL MALPRACTICE HERE, she should collect. If they made the best decision based on the data they had, including patient input, then Brockman has no case.

I get it, what I don’t get is why you are literally blaming this on a 12 year old kid, when the parents should have been…parents. As we’ve said before, we don’t let children make life altering decisions, because they don’t know enough to make them.

But we already do that, buddy. Just ask all the Ritalin Zombies who will spend most of their lives working menial jobs because their teachers and parents drugged them instead of actually trying to teach them. Now THAT'S a big business, the ADHD racket!

Now imagine if every kid diagnosed with ADHD comes back and sues his pediatrician because they thought filling him with mind altering drugs ruined his future.

And despite this, you still support things that could mess children up.
 
Well, obviously there isn't a lot of money to be made, because if there were, there wouldn't be a shortage of specialists. Out of our FOUR TRILLION in spending on health care, 1.9 Billion represents 0.0475% of money spent. Barely a trickle.


The biggest barrier both to safe hormonal therapy and to appropriate general medical care for transgender patients is the lack of access to care. Despite both guidelines and data supporting the current transgender medicine treatment paradigm (813), transgender patients report that lack of providers with expertise in transgender medicine represents the single largest component inhibiting access (14). Transgender treatment is not taught in conventional medical curricula and too few physicians have the requisite knowledge and comfort level (1519)

Other reported barriers include: financial barriers (lack of insurance, lack of income), discrimination, lack of cultural competence by health care providers, health systems barriers (inappropriate electronic records, forms, lab references, clinic facilities) and socioeconomic barriers (transportation, housing, mental health). While some of these health care barriers are faced by other minority groups, many are unique and many are significantly magnified for transgender persons
.


So is this article suggesting that if there were ample access to providers, that the number of pre teens being started on transitioning would be higher?
 
Nobody is getting bottom surgery at 7.

Most adult transgenders don't have access to bottom surgery.

I don't pretend to be a medical expert on this area of medicine.

I just don't think medical decisions should be made because people who believe in a book with talking snakes think it's bad.


I just don't think medical decisions should be made because people who believe in a book with talking snakes think it's bad.

And again, an argument that nobody is making. Nobody is arguing this from a religious perspective, so why do you keep going there?
 
You said that you weren't talking about bottom surgery, and then you talked about hysterectomies... um, that's bottom surgery.



Probably the same way they make her take Ritalin because she's acting up.



Giving kids mind altering drugs should ALWAYS be done with caution. It is with hormone therapy and puberty blockers, but they are giving out SSRI like they are fucking candy.


Ssri are not “mind altering” drugs, at least not in the way you are suggesting. All an ssri does is prevent the reuptake of serotonin so that chemical signals are more readily available to be transferred around the brain.
 
It does take a little, not much really, intelligence to critically think about a topic. I asked for evidence teachers were transitioning children without the parents knowledge, which does not make sense if the parents see the kid on a regular basis. So I asked for a wee bit of evidence that it was really a problem. Then the personal attacks started, as per usual. Instead of only reading and thinking about data that confirms your preexisting biases, think about stuff. Do you really believe teachers transition ' lack of students without the parents knowing?
Yes. They use the new names and pronouns at school. My step great granddaughter was given a breast binder to wear at school that was very painful.

When Emma complained that she wasn't a boy, that was evidence of parents lack of gender affirming care.

That's why she was sent to Texas.
 
Yes. They use the new names and pronouns at school. My step great granddaughter was given a breast binder to wear at school that was very painful.

When Emma complained that she wasn't a boy, that was evidence of parents lack of gender affirming care.

That's why she was sent to Texas.
Sure. Do you have any evidence this really happened? If it really did happen of couse it is an outrage and must be stopped. But I don't beleive it without evidence.
 
Sure. Do you have any evidence this really happened? If it really did happen of couse it is an outrage and must be stopped. But I don't beleive it without evidence.
The only evidence is that while Emma was told not to tell her parents, no one said anything about grandparents. She told my son and daughter-in-law what was happening. Told them everything. She was on a plane to relatives in Texas in two days. Now the whole family is in Texas. They call now and then. She's doing well. Has a little boyfriend.
 
The only evidence is that while Emma was told not to tell her parents, no one said anything about grandparents. She told my son and daughter-in-law what was happening. Told them everything. She was on a plane to relatives in Texas in two days. Now the whole family is in Texas. They call now and then. She's doing well. Has a little boyfriend.
Ok, I hope all of you are going well.
 
Um, no. Bottom surgery, whatever that is, is not a hysterectomy. That’s why a hysterectomy is um, called, um, a hysterectomy.
Um, where do you think the uterus is?

And those 10 other kinds of crazy is why I cannot see how you don’t understand that this should have never happened.

because they thought that the could resolve the other ten kinds of crazy if they resolved her gender identity.

I get it, what I don’t get is why you are literally blaming this on a 12 year old kid, when the parents should have been…parents. As we’ve said before, we don’t let children make life altering decisions, because they don’t know enough to make them.

I've met 30 year olds who can't make important decisions.

And despite this, you still support things that could mess children up.
Only in your mind.
So is this article suggesting that if there were ample access to providers, that the number of pre teens being started on transitioning would be higher?
Um, yeah. And this would be a good thing, really. Better to start them before puberty sets in than after they grow more into a body that their mind doesn't match.

And again, an argument that nobody is making. Nobody is arguing this from a religious perspective, so why do you keep going there?

Oh, bullshit, you take the religious crazy out, and we would accept other people's sexuality.

Ssri are not “mind altering” drugs, at least not in the way you are suggesting. All an ssri does is prevent the reuptake of serotonin so that chemical signals are more readily available to be transferred around the brain.

They turn little Billy into a zombie so he behaves himself... and you guys on the right are fine with that, I guess because Jesus didn't say it was bad.
 
Um, where do you think the uterus is?



because they thought that the could resolve the other ten kinds of crazy if they resolved her gender identity.



I've met 30 year olds who can't make important decisions.


Only in your mind.

Um, yeah. And this would be a good thing, really. Better to start them before puberty sets in than after they grow more into a body that their mind doesn't match.



Oh, bullshit, you take the religious crazy out, and we would accept other people's sexuality.



They turn little Billy into a zombie so he behaves himself... and you guys on the right are fine with that, I guess because Jesus didn't say it was bad.
Um, what organ is removed during a hysterectomy?

I wouldn’t let your religious convictions interfere with your allowance for grooming of young children. Overwhelmingly, people are offended by the left's affiliation with “minor attracted persons”, groomers, transing groupies and the like.
 
Um, what organ is removed during a hysterectomy?

I wouldn’t let your religious convictions interfere with your allowance for grooming of young children. Overwhelmingly, people are offended by the left's affiliation with “minor attracted persons”, groomers, transing groupies and the like.

Yeah, here's the thing... your transphobia will just be another bigotry everyone will be embarrassed about in 20 years... and your sort will have to find another group to hate... but you are running out of them.

Maybe you'll all start hating each other.
 
Um, what organ is removed during a hysterectomy?

I wouldn’t let your religious convictions interfere with your allowance for grooming of young children. Overwhelmingly, people are offended by the left's affiliation with “minor attracted persons”, groomers, transing groupies and the like.
Do you think everyone who is not a Republican or maybe a Trumpian are groomer pedophiles?
 

Forum List

Back
Top