Leave it to Texas republicans to ban books. Free speech is circumstantial, apparently.

But how? What actual effect would it have?
CONFUSION, for one. Most young children, the ones now being targeted, normally do not even think about sex and gender. The uproar over the Florida bill, that was directed at 5-8 year old's showed parents what the libatarded perverts are trying to do, GROOM THEIR children. Good luck with that. Parents will kill for their children, be careful.
 
CONFUSION, for one. Most young children, the ones now being targeted, normally do not even think about sex and gender. The uproar over the Florida bill, that was directed at 5-8 year old's showed parents what the libatarded perverts are trying to do, GROOM THEIR children. Good luck with that. Parents will kill for their children, be careful.
Your opinion is entirely emotional. There’s no logic to what you’re saying. You think it’s correct simply because it sounds like it is correct.
 
So republicans are concerned books are “pornographic” if they have gay characters in it. There doesn’t have to be sex or nudity in these books of course. They are simply pornographic for having gay characters lol. Republicans have the emotional maturity of 8th graders. This is ironic, of course, because they are pretending to they want to protect kids of such an age.

Think about this critically, republicans. Let’s say a kid’s book has a gay character in it who is fully clothed through out and a child read it. Do you really think with any rationality that this would turn the kid gay?

Banning pornography is not the same as banning books dickhead. Fully clothed eh? We talking spandex pants and assless chaps? Why would anybody know that the person was gay anyway? Heterocaracters don't wear their heterosexuality on their chest like a merit badge. Why should gay characters wear their gayness on their chest like a merit badge?
 
Last edited:
I never said it was necessary. I don’t at all care if a kid never gets exposed to what I’m talking about. Simply put, if they are exposed, it doesn’t at all matter.

It absolutely matters developmentally and psychologically. Preteen children have no understanding of sexual identity. That understanding does not begin to start until adolescence and does not fully form until adulthood. What you are advocating is extremely damaging to young children. It is sick.
 
It absolutely matters developmentally and psychologically. Preteen children have no understanding of sexual identity. That understanding does not begin to start until adolescence and does not fully form until adulthood. What you are advocating is extremely damaging to young children. It is sick.
You’re right they don’t have that understanding. Therefore if they are exposed to it, it doesn’t matter.
 
So republicans are concerned books are “pornographic” if they have gay characters in it. There doesn’t have to be sex or nudity in these books of course. They are simply pornographic for having gay characters lol. Republicans have the emotional maturity of 8th graders. This is ironic, of course, because they are pretending to they want to protect kids of such an age.

Think about this critically, republicans. Let’s say a kid’s book has a gay character in it who is fully clothed through out and a child read it. Do you really think with any rationality that this would turn the kid gay?

If this upsets you so much by all means don't come to Texas, we don't need you.

Schools and parents get to decide what is or isn't appropriate for kids of any6 age.
 
So republicans are concerned books are “pornographic” if they have gay characters in it. There doesn’t have to be sex or nudity in these books of course. They are simply pornographic for having gay characters lol. Republicans have the emotional maturity of 8th graders. This is ironic, of course, because they are pretending to they want to protect kids of such an age.

Think about this critically, republicans. Let’s say a kid’s book has a gay character in it who is fully clothed through out and a child read it. Do you really think with any rationality that this would turn the kid gay?

Irony just fucked itself in the ass.
 
Republicans always pretending they give a damn about 'the children'. They don't. They get off on cutting programs that help children as well as poor adults in the red states mostly. Their philosophy being if you help the least among us, they will get lazy and not want to work. They're hypocrites that work mostly for the oligarchy. I doubt if the folks that still love trump have figured this out yet. They're working against their own best interests
 
Republicans always pretending they give a damn about 'the children'. They don't. They get off on cutting programs that help children as well as poor adults. Their philosophy being if you help the least among us, they will get lazy and not want to work. They're hypocrites that work mostly for the oligarchy. I doubt if the folks that still love trump have figured this out yet. They're working against their own interests
Bullshit. When some dude pulls up to the welfare office in a nice car, smoking a cigarette, fresh tattoos, the latest NBA outfit, and wants to apply for a food card, you're gonna give it. Huh.
 

Forum List

Back
Top