Lawsuits against the companies that make assault rifles.

No, it isn't. It is designed to propel a bullet to a TARGET.

PEOPLE, determine what that target is.
that is plainly a stupid response.

Perhaps you should read the many many many gun lover threads talking about how effective their favorite guns are at killing, kill range...

A gun's sole design purpose is to kill.
To claim otherwise is simply stupid.
 
that is plainly a stupid response.

Perhaps you should read the many many many gun lover threads talking about how effective their favorite guns are at killing, kill range...

A gun's sole design purpose is to kill.
To claim otherwise is simply stupid.
This items sole purpose is to hit a baseball

1696510567968.png

and has NEVER been used to kill anyone, right?
Kitchen knives sole purpose is to cut food,

1696510882127.png

and has never been used to kill, right?

and firearms are only used to kill, never defend, right?
 
that is plainly a stupid response.

Perhaps you should read the many many many gun lover threads talking about how effective their favorite guns are at killing, kill range...

A gun's sole design purpose is to kill.
To claim otherwise is simply stupid.


Post a link to one..thanks!
 
This items sole purpose is to hit a baseball

View attachment 838562
and has NEVER been used to kill anyone, right?
Kitchen knives sole purpose is to cut food,

View attachment 838565
and has never been used to kill, right?

and firearms are only used to kill, never defend, right?
You can use a pistol for a hammer.
Doesn't change it's designed function.

Throwing a pie doesn't change it's design function.

1696514466758.gif
 
You can't sue a firearm manufacturer because someone illegally misused a product they made. The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) is a U.S law, passed in 2005,


They are winning lawsuits. But thank you for misrepresenting what is actually going on the real world, outside of your demented fantasy one.
 
Is that why Newsom freed over a hundred thousand VIOLENT felons from prison early the past few years? Too many violent crazies out there?

Well, no, he had to let them go because the COURTS ruled that the prisons were overcrowded.



The sandy hook families didn't win because Remington tried to settle. Remington had already closed it's doors and went out of business. It was the lawyers who settled.
And that other bullshit you said is easy to think when you're the one alive and not dead. If your life is leaving you you'll wished you had a gun to defend yourself.

Again, a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a member of the household than a bad guy.

Sandy Hook won because of the advertising, not because there was something wrong with the firearm.
Quite right. They won because of the CONDUCT of the company marketing to unstable people.
Again, that's his proud Nazi heritage speaking. His relatives back in The Old Country disarmed Jews. Later, they rounded them up and murdered them en-masse.
The problem is the Zionists have become as bad as the Nazis, like abused children who've grown up to abuse others.
 
Well, no, he had to let them go because the COURTS ruled that the prisons were overcrowded.





Again, a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a member of the household than a bad guy.


Quite right. They won because of the CONDUCT of the company marketing to unstable people.

The problem is the Zionists have become as bad as the Nazis, like abused children who've grown up to abuse others.
Pure lies you stupid fuck
 
Well, no, he had to let them go because the COURTS ruled that the prisons were overcrowded.





Again, a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a member of the household than a bad guy.


Quite right. They won because of the CONDUCT of the company marketing to unstable people.

The problem is the Zionists have become as bad as the Nazis, like abused children who've grown up to abuse others.
Overcrowding?
Take $12,000 from the train to nowhere boondoggle and build a prison in 2 days on all that land.

1696545842972.jpeg

But nope. You fascists release violent dangerous felons out onto the street to prey upon innocents.
 
Overcrowding?
Take $12,000 from the train to nowhere boondoggle and build a prison in 2 days on all that land.

Um, okay.

YOu still have to guard those prisoners.
Still have to feed them.
Still have to house them. (Can't just put them in tents)

Prisons are a large, ongoing expense. It costs anywhere from $35,000 to $50,000 a year to house one prisoner. Maybe makes sense in the case of a murderer, but a guy who sshoplifted $900 in merch, not so much.
 

Forum List

Back
Top