Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This is why any defense of her actions are ridiculous. The police set up a barricade, stacking furniture in front of the already secured doors. And then several officers inside pointed their weapons at the door and shouted multiple warnings.Yup, babbitt was just a trespasser until she tried to enter, with MULTIPLE warnings, the restricted zone.
She had apparently ZERO reason to enter this restricted zone, but she made a deadly choice, to enter anyway. Why? What was her intent?
Armed, Unarmed, Man, Woman, Person, TV or Camera.
She was breaking the law.
I think you mean,Relevance?
Again, relevance?
Clean up on aisle 12.
Relevance, Goober.I think you mean,
Clean up on Aisle 2, because YOUR ASS is Full of Shit.
Clean that mess up.
Was there a sign posted on the door that stated “Entering this area is illegal. Trespassers will be shot?”
If not and if the officer did not see a weapon in the hands of the woman he had no reason to use lethal force to stop her.
I wonder if this is the same 40 caliber Glock 22 the murderer negligently left on the toilet of the Capitol bathroom that time? The murderer should have been immediately removed from duty for doing something that stupid.
View attachment 585482
Indeed, justice was done when Babbitt was lawfully killed while committing her act of domestic terrorism.
Why do you feel a compulsion to try and save face by intentionally lying about me, claiming I'm an expert at nothing? I'm a Washington state certified trainer among other thingsNM is always talking out of her ass. She is an expert at nothing.
Tell me something I don't know.
LOL, wrong again lol.You're a horse's ass.
You lied that she was warned three times.I mentioned that, you twat.
No, they didn't go to murdering people. The mob was smashing the doors down for a prolonged period of time and the police were yelling warnings at the violent insurrectionists. The Babbitt was repeatedly warned with a gun in her face and she made her choice to attack.Yep.....they went from...."Hey...you guys need to settle down" to murdering people in cold-blood in a micro-second.
That which you envision would amount to justifiable homicide. Much, much different from the unjustifiable murder of George Floyd.Imagine what would happen to any cop if they had pulled this stunt and murdered an unarmed peaceful black protester.
They would put that pig under the prison.
It's all about the cult.....find a martyr, religious relics.................SSDD.I can't even imagine what they want with the firearm unless it's a pretext or part thereof that will give them sort of additional standing?
And you saw all of this?No, they didn't go to murdering people. The mob was smashing the doors down for a prolonged period of time and the police were yelling warnings at the violent insurrectionists. The Babbitt was repeatedly warned with a gun in her face and she made her choice to attack.
That which you envision would amount to justifiable homicide. Much, much different from the unjustifiable murder of George Floyd.
I'm willing to discuss the question further with you if you can keep it together?
Such whitey rightie victimhood.You lied that she was warned three times.
She wasn't - BLM Byrd said nothing - just shot whitey. Summary execution. Imagine if she were black and he were white, there would still be nightly riots.
But no worries, white lives don't matter.
YesAnd you saw all of this?
Standing to the side? Is that a tactic that could be suspected of bad practice?That's not what I saw.
An unedited version of the Babbitt shooting....the one that originally aired....showed cops standing to the side on purpose....
Daring? I could agree that was true, but I don't see it as being applicable as contrary to acceptable police behaviour. I would grant you that the police officer would have bad feelings toward Babbitt that could hasten his decision to shoot. Those perhaps being feeliings of duty to his assigned job of protectiing those in peril.and literally daring anyone to try to break down the door....
then that killer cop shot that woman in the throat without saying one word of warning.
You didn't see any of it.....not in person and not on video.Yes
Standing to the side? Is that a tactic that could be suspected of bad practice?
Daring? I could agree that was true, but I don't see it as being applicable as contrary to acceptable police behaviour. I would grant you that the police officer would have bad feelings toward Babbitt that could hasten his decision to shoot. Those perhaps being feeliings of duty to his assigned job of protectiing those in peril.
And maybe I could go one step further for you. The police officer could have felt that he was given an opportunity to kill a white woman and he grabbed the opportunity based on his personal feelings. It's a possibility but I don't see how that possibility could ever be pursued to condemn him. It's my rather careless speculation. for the benefit of closing the gap on finding common ground with you.
Likely not exactly true but in any event the gun in her face must have served as ample warning.
In Canada we don't see any shooting by police as a desirable outcome, regardless of the nature of the victim. We are very slow to accept that, but I think we are rational about the need of a police officer to act appropriately.
In this instance, I would suggest that the police officer acted according to standards that most Americans would find acceptable. Grant me my suggestion of it not being acceptable police behaviour in Canada.
Wrong, duck. Once again you don't know what the fuck you're talking about and you have no standing so STFU.No, they didn't go to murdering people. The mob was smashing the doors down for a prolonged period of time and the police were yelling warnings at the violent insurrectionists. The Babbitt was repeatedly warned with a gun in her face and she made her choice to attack.
That which you envision would amount to justifiable homicide. Much, much different from the unjustifiable murder of George Floyd.
I'm willing to discuss the question further with you if you can keep it together?
You're a moron, duck. Trespassing in a public building is not a capitol crime in the US. Michael Byrd murdered an unarmed trespasser. Now run along and straighten out the problems in your own sand box.I would suggest that the police officer acted according to standards that most Americans would find acceptable
Yup, babbitt was just a trespasser until she tried to enter, with MULTIPLE warnings, the restricted zone.
She had apparently ZERO reason to enter this restricted zone, but she made a deadly choice, to enter anyway. Why? What was her intent?
Armed, Unarmed, Man, Woman, Person, TV or Camera.
She was breaking the law.
Thank you for your opinion. Please stand by until I have enough time to answer your suggestion in a manner that is deserving of your comments.You're a moron, duck. Trespassing in a public building is not a capitol crime in the US. Michael Byrd murdered an unarmed trespasser. Now run along and straighten out the problems in your own sand box.
