What a crock of shit. You cannot support your claim so you resort to word salad and more unsupported claims.
You made an assertion, that babbit's death was a result of her own stupid attack on a public building, leading to a reasonable use of force by the cop, killing her.
That SOUNDS reasonable, considering that babbit was at teh time, rioting and attacking a public buidling.
So, to show that this was NOT based on her politics but on her rioting activity, I asked you to give an example of cops gunning down, a LEFTY rioters, during the far more numerous and violent lefty riots are that time period.
That reasonable request for a supporting example from you, is not word salad, or an unsupported claim.
You are saying those words, because you are unable to give a supporting example for your claim.
The lack of counter examples, ie lefty rioters being gunned down by police, especially in a dem city, strong supports my point, ie that this was a time of CODDLING RIOTERS, not taking a hard line.
I don’t recall any rioters trying to breach manned police barricades
Well, normally the dem mayors or dem appointed police chiefs would order the cops to protect the RIOTERS, so yeah, that makes some sense,
BUT, even so, i recall many instances of lefty rioters attacking police lines or police protected buildings.
So, similar enough, that if your position was true, that there would be many, many examples of lefty rioters gunned down like the mad dogs that they are.
BUt, there are NOT. Which strongly supports my point, that babbit was fully justified in expecting her behavior to be coddled.
And you can’t find any.
End of story
Well, I haven't looked, becasue even if I found one, it wouldn't change anything for you.
As a hard core lefty partisan, you want to use government force and mob violence to silence or kill your enemies and arrest people who defend themselves.
The rest from you is just shit talk.