Latest Iran offer not acceptable says Trump.
The latest F**k You Iran sends Trump. How long will he take it.
The latest F**k You Iran sends Trump. How long will he take it.
Latest Iran offer not acceptable says Trump
- Thread starter ElmerMudd
- Start date
MarathonMike
Diamond Member
The "peace talks" are a ruse to let time tick off the clock. You can't make a deal with Iran, they have no defined leadership structure.
- Thread starter
- #3
If you can't deal with them how do you end the war.
Independent thinker
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2015
- 41,126
- 37,766
- 3,488
I don't know why we were even talking about it. Their offers have always been unacceptable. The very reason why we bombed them in the first place was because they refused to talk about their nuclear program, you know the program that is for peaceful purposes only. And, after all the bombing, they still don't want to talk about their peaceful nuclear program. We need to finish the job on these people and I'm totally against the 12 years Trump had been proposing. That's just another bad Obama deal. The last thing we need to do is allow them to rebuild and rearm where 12 years in the future it would be much harder to do this again. We need to get it over with now so that that doesn't happen.
luiza
Diamond Member
You need good Theatre to lead dumb people to believe a story .
So you might think .
Which is why this Dumb second rate Theatre is so remarkable ------it shows how the Dumb ones are truly very Dumb --- and that just about any old piece of slack script writing will be believed .
Heads down Munchers . No peeping .
No fertiliser equals Starvation.
No plastic means no packaging .
Nothing to send and nothing to send nothing in .
Nice One .
So you might think .
Which is why this Dumb second rate Theatre is so remarkable ------it shows how the Dumb ones are truly very Dumb --- and that just about any old piece of slack script writing will be believed .
Heads down Munchers . No peeping .
No fertiliser equals Starvation.
No plastic means no packaging .
Nothing to send and nothing to send nothing in .
Nice One .
- Thread starter
- #6
Well if you know they will not negotiate an end to their nuclear program, Trump must know it.
WHAT IS HE DOING? He changes his plan daily.
He may end up with a deal that is very close to the Obama deal.
luiza
Diamond Member
He is crashing the Petro Dollar in order to bring down the Debt financial sytstem .
How best to achieve that ?
Energy and Food Starvation and keeping the Munchers deflected away from the Truth .
You have fallen for it , and it still has some way to run .
Perhaps some more real violence to keep Hysteria on the boil .
Independent thinker
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2015
- 41,126
- 37,766
- 3,488
I don't know the future but I don't think we should allow them to have nuclear weapons at all, ever. If we allow them to start right back up again in 10 years, 12 years, 20 years, all that means is it gives them time to rebuild all of their defenses and offensive miltary weapons all over again and maybe have more alliances with Russia, China, North Korea and the like, whereas now these countries really aren't helping Iran very much at the moment. All of this means we are much better off going after them now than in the future, and, whether the left like it or not, Israel's right to exist should be part of any deal.
Also, Iran claims their nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only and yet they refuse to even talk about their "peaceful" nuclear program as part of any deal. That would seem so very easy if their nuclear program really was for peaceful purposes only. It's like they're admitting that they're lying about that.
Last edited:
luiza
Diamond Member
From the nation that is the home of Terrorism and Violence and is headed toward Banana Republic status .
From the nation that nobody really wants to be associated with , particularly since its HQ is run by a bunch of insane Genocidists .
Very progressive ? Or just a Dead Nation still staggering ?
kyzr
Diamond Member
Keep the blockade on Iran's oil until they bleed out, the CIA says about 3 or 4 months, probably shorter if we bomb the RR bridges to China and the pumping stations to the Caspian Sea.
kyzr
Diamond Member
I don't think so. Trump has Iran by the balls with his blockade.
All Trump needs to do is keep the blockade until Iran bleeds out, about 3 or 4 months according to the FBI.
Probably quicker if we bomb the RR bridges to China and the pumping stations to the Caspian Sea.
- Thread starter
- #12
Yes, but what collateral damage will happen until they surrender. The mullahs are fighting for their life. They feel if they give in, they are all will be done in. That is probably true.
They are already going much longer than Trump thought possible.
Lol.
Much sooner than your 3-4 months blockade the world economy will be toast.
Some who'll have lost everything might change their mind last minute before their suicide and go hunting for Americans instead.
Iran will not let go of this situation without reparations (massive injection of money).
Their country is destroyed, the regime survives on the rally-around-flag effect which will not last forever.
Pay day. It was your choice starting this adventure.
Much sooner than your 3-4 months blockade the world economy will be toast.
Some who'll have lost everything might change their mind last minute before their suicide and go hunting for Americans instead.
Iran will not let go of this situation without reparations (massive injection of money).
Their country is destroyed, the regime survives on the rally-around-flag effect which will not last forever.
Pay day. It was your choice starting this adventure.
toomuchtime_
Platinum Member
- Dec 29, 2008
- 22,620
- 6,871
- 350
Bullshit. The ayatollahs do not have the power to sustain their blockade if the US decides to take it away. A simple statement will end it. The US announces that for every shot fired at traffic near or in the Strait, an Iranian port will be destroyed, or an oil refinery or a fuel storage tank or a bridge or two or a power station, so that no military vehicles will run and the lights and computers in command centers will be out and when the ayatollahs call out orders to retaliate no one will answer because the soldiers will all have gone home to take care of their families trembling in the dark.
Bla-bla-bla. We both know two things - 1) America doesn't posses enough conventional military force to do so, 2) Every missile used against Iran won't be used against Russians in Ukraine or against Chinemen in Taiwan.
toomuchtime_
Platinum Member
- Dec 29, 2008
- 22,620
- 6,871
- 350
Are really stupid enough to believe the Pentagon hasn't chosen to have enough missiles to deal with all threats?
Matted Joybeard
Gold Member
- Dec 2, 2014
- 1,608
- 639
- 208
He has Iran by the balls with the blockade that's why he's threatening to nuke them and resume bombing.
It's not about smartness or stupidity of Pentagon planners. It's about real capabilities.
toomuchtime_
Platinum Member
- Dec 29, 2008
- 22,620
- 6,871
- 350
Are you trying to sound stupid again? If the Pentagon planned properly, then the US has enough missiles, capabilities, to handle all the threats we face.
No one can't have enough of missiles to handle all potential threats. They've planned about "realistic threats". And what actually had happened wasn't seen as "realistic" by US intelligence.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Support is growing on the right to fully prosecute women seeking abortions.- Started by Zincwarrior
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-
