Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

[Rigby5]

So attempting to flee in the direction of the nearest law enforcement is not the ultimate form of "doing anything possible to avoid the situation?"

That's a confusing line of reasoning, my good man.

If he has not shown up with a rifle, he would have had to flee, and the 3 separate shootings were not all at once, so clearly he did not flee after the first, as you claim.

 

[Rigby5]

And using your past arguments someone should have killed that guy on the spot.

No, my past argument was that the one excuse for being armed is if one is defending specific property.
This person is doing that.
He is not moving around or talking to people, so then had the role of sentry.
That is not intimidating, provocative, or threatening.

 

[TemplarKormac]

If he has not shown up with a rifle, he would have had to flee, and the 3 separate shootings were not all at once, so clearly he did not flee after the first, as you claim.

You're a crackpot conspiracy theorist, Rigby.

 

[Rigby5]

Sure you did. You probably missed this one, then.

View attachment 562940

I agree this armed person should be arrested or shot.
Normally that is what police would do.
You can't go walking around in a riot with an open weapon.

 

[Rigby5]

You're a crackpot conspiracy theorist, Rigby.

The fact 3 different people who were there found the rifle held by Rittenhouse to be offensive, proves I am right.
There is no theory involved.

 

[Obiwan]

I went over hundreds of images of the Atlanta riots, and the only armed images were where vandals had been destroying a memorial to Rayshard Brooks and BLM has to install armed guards in order to stop the white racist vandals.

I seem to recall you saying that anyone who brings a rifle to a protest should be killed on the spot...

Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

I like Ray. I'm certainly disappointed in his reaction to this trial. He seems to have wandered out of civil morals. Biden called Kyle a WHITE SUPREMACIST. WHAT THE FUCK? POTUS should not be lying about local cases. Just disgusting.

www.usmessageboard.com

Damn, boy....

Why are you demonstrating that blacks are running around with firearms (and by your standards, should be shot)???

And this was after I pointed out that the black militia at the Breonna Taylor protest was armed too????

Why are you agitating for us to shoot all of those blacks????

Are you racist or something????

 

[TemplarKormac]

Yeah, because Rittenhouse pointed his gun at him.

You obviously aren't paying attention to the evidence.

Event 1: Rittenhouse was struck with rock(s)

Event 2: Rittenhouse was struck twice with a skateboard.

Event 3: Rosenbaum charged Rittenhouse and attempted to take his firearm.

Event 4: Rittenhouse fired his weapon in self-defense.

Furthermore:

 

[eddiew37]

Face this repub nitwits
The fix is in Judge and jury are in on it
-----
The judge seems very sympathetic towards the defense, I'm betting the murderer gets off.

 

[TemplarKormac]

The fact 3 different people who were there found the rifle held by Rittenhouse to be offensive, proves I am right.

Being offended does not give you a license to kill.

Please be on your way.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Face this repub nitwits
The fix is in Judge and jury are in on it
-----
The judge seems very sympathetic towards the defense, I'm betting the murderer gets off.

...

Here comes the desperation.

You know what's coming and you can't stop it.

 

[Obiwan]

And using your past arguments someone should have killed that guy on the spot.

Actually, I find Rigby's arguments that anyone in public with a gun should be killed (and then pointing out where blacks are carrying guns) to be interesting...

I can't help but wonder if he is from the LIberal utopia of Shitcago (where it's always open season, and there are no bag limits)....

I'm also interested in his apparent take on Gaige Grosskreutz (who approached Rittenhouser with a loaded gun in his hand)....

Since Grosskreutz survived (instead of being killed), I wonder if Rigby thinks Grosskreutz deserved to be shot, and should refund the $10 million he collected from the city of Kenosha!!!!

 

[Missouri_Mike]

No, my past argument was that the one excuse for being armed is if one is defending specific property.
This person is doing that.
He is not moving around or talking to people, so then had the role of sentry.
That is not intimidating, provocative, or threatening.

The entire point of sentries is to be intimidating and threatening. If they aren’t they aren’t sentries they’re bystanders.

Is your definition of specific property just things you like?

 

[Rigby5]

I seem to recall you saying that anyone who brings a rifle to a protest should be killed on the spot...

Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

I like Ray. I'm certainly disappointed in his reaction to this trial. He seems to have wandered out of civil morals. Biden called Kyle a WHITE SUPREMACIST. WHAT THE FUCK? POTUS should not be lying about local cases. Just disgusting.

www.usmessageboard.com

Damn, boy....

Why are you demonstrating that blacks are running around with firearms (and by your standards, should be shot)???

And this was after I pointed out that the black militia at the Breonna Taylor protest was armed too????

Why are you agitating for us to shoot all of those blacks????

Are you racist or something????

There is nothing wrong with a memorial guard being armed, because he is stationary and clearly defending private property.
He is not trying to intimidate or provoke like Rittenhouse was.

 

[struth]

If he has not shown up with a rifle, he would have had to flee, and the 3 separate shootings were not all at once, so clearly he did not flee after the first, as you claim.

yeah he would of be killed had he not had a gun. Dead on the spot by the dnc brownshirts

 

[Rigby5]

The entire point of sentries is to be intimidating and threatening. If they aren’t they aren’t sentries they’re bystanders.

Is your definition of specific property just things you like?

No, sentries are not intimidating or threatening anyone who is not harming the specific property.
As I said before, those on private property and defending private property are not a general threat to the public, so then are the exception, as I have already stated..
Rittenhouse was NOT acting at all like a sentry, and was moving around from one group of demonstrators to another, deliberately trying to frighten them.

 

[Rigby5]

yeah he would of be killed had he not had a gun. Dead on the spot by the dnc brownshirts

Wrong.
Since all the other people were white and were not shot, then clearly the only constant was that people who were intimidating others with a rifle were the cause.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Threads like this one show a lot about people. Productive, well adjusted individuals identify with the small business owners being targeted by terrorists because those people remind them of themselves.

Those who identify only with arsonists and pedophiles identify with that particular element of society for the same reason.

 

[struth]

Wrong.
Since all the other people were white and were not shot, then clearly the only constant was that people who were intimidating others with a rifle were the cause.

they didn’t seem that intimated when they chased him down with their own guns.

try again

 

[JohnDB]

I can't believe that they put Grosskreutz on the Today show...he was obviously angry at Kyle but today we seen footage from a new angle how Grosskreutz was definitely trying to kill Kyle with no other justification other than Kyle was on the ground and defenseless from being attacked by the kicks and skateboard.

Grosskreutz himself has an extensive criminal history and admitted to three felonies while on the witness stand.

 

[eddiew37]

...

Here comes the desperation.

You know what's coming and you can't stop it.

True a punk ass killer set free Hopefully he doesn't have long