Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

Curious, if the government had acted in its capacity to prevent this riot, Rittenhouse (foolishly or otherwise) would not have been compelled to go out there that night.

Who was there to restore order to the rest of the city?

It disturbs me that so many people I considered to be decent and caring think that the appropriate action when law and order completely break down is the huddle in their houses and simply allow the animals to do whatever they want.
 
Makes sense as the prosecutor knows he lost.

Why doesnt the judge throw out the charges due to lack of evidence. Would save the jury from being harrassed later. Everyone kniws theyll get tsrgetted

I have to wonder if the prosecutor even wanted to take this case, or was ordered to by his superiors.
 
Wrong.
Only one of the 3 shot had a gun, and it is likely he was never going to pull the trigger on that even.
Rittenhouse was chased AFTER he started shooting and made himself a deadly threat.
Oh no...not even remotely true.
Grosskreutz had re-racked his gun to make sure it was charged and ready to shoot. (Live round from his gun was introduced into evidence today by the DEFENSE....)The evidence today clearly showed how he was clearly a predator with a gun. And if he hadn't repointed his gun at Kyle trying to kill him he could masterbate today...
 
None of that alters what I said.
Ha. It alters it, A LOT.

The prosecution isn't even trying to make any of the points you're making. Even as bad as they are at making their case, they aren't you. Even they know that line of reasoning would be incredibly stupid.
 
Last edited:
What a piece of shit this kid really is. The defense has tried to portray him as a boy scout, trying to help people, and his "breakdown" was one of the worst pieces of acting I've ever seen. One of the "excluded" pieces of evidence was that he beat up and girl and punched her in the face.

Driving without a license, on a regular basis. Buying a gun he wasn't legally old enough to buy. When the building he was supposedly "protecting" was safe, he went into the crowd, looking for trouble. Lock this piece of shit up and throw away the key.
Rittenhouse walks. And you cry like the lying piece of shit you are . Acting. You’re a pathetic bitch.
 
When he seen trouble going on, he addressed it instead of moving away from it as the law requires in order to use deadly force as a self-defense claim.

With all due respect - and I DO respect you quite a bit, Ray - I hope that you are not the person passing by on the sidewalk if I'm ever mugged. It disturbs me greatly that you think the appropriate action for a decent human being in the face of violent anarchy is to walk away from it.
 
Yes cecilie it woud surprise me as I know infinitely more than your dumb republican trump ass does

In other words, you're not only piss-stupid, you're so piss-stupid that you don't even know how piss-stupid you are, and think registering as a Democrat is all that was needed to make you smart.

It's a good thing you're so ready to tell yourself that you're brilliant, since you'll never hear it from anyone else.
 
I understand what you're saying. My oldest brother, who participated in the D-Day Invasion, would never talk about it either.

I watched Kyle's face the entire time. He was screwing it up trying to force the tears. It was a stone cold act, and a plea for sympathy. He certainly had no problem describing the other two shootings, or saying the first guy "ambushed" him . The defiant kid who kept repeating over and over "I did what I had to do to defend myself" is who he is.

This kid is a thug. His eyes are cold and without feeling. His driving without a license is very telling of his respect for the law. His behaviour, demeanor and whole attitude, while typical for a kid his age, is precisely the reason why possession of semi-automatic weapons is illegal. And he was flouting that law as well.

He came across as very well coached, but his even his descriptions of his actions that night - pointing his gun at a gun who was setting a dumpster fire or something similar, and basically threatening protestors with it, shows he was the aggressor at all times.

The protestors were the "good guys" trying to take out the "bad guy with the gun", who should not have been there, and most definitely should not have been armed.
There we have it. This bitch approves of criminals attempting to murder Rittenhouse, then cries when Rittenhouse has to defend himself and her beloved domestic abuser and pedo get sent straight to hell.
 
No, he's saying that Kyle shouldn't have been there in the first place, and he shouldn't have been pointing his gun and threatening people. Police told him to go home, and he stayed.

I dunno how it works in Canada - because who gives enough of a fuck to find out - but in the United States, we don't have public streets that people aren't allowed to walk down, even if evil, animalistic shitstains that you like happen to want to burn and loot on them at that moment. And yes, he SHOULD have been pointing his gun at anyone who was attacking him, as actually happened. He didn't threaten anyone, nor did the police tell him to go home. If you really feel the need to invent "facts" for yourself, at least do us all the courtesy of not insulting our intelligence by stating them in public, as if anyone is going to believe them.

Back to the couch, heifer. Those Cheetos aren't going to eat themselves.
 
There we have it. This bitch approves of criminals attempting to murder Rittenhouse, then cries when Rittenhouse has to defend himself and her beloved domestic abuser and pedo get sent straight to hell.

Well, she's very outraged that someone dared to oppose her pet thugs instead of letting them do exactly as they pleased.
 
I dunno how it works in Canada - because who gives enough of a fuck to find out - but in the United States, we don't have public streets that people aren't allowed to walk down, even if evil, animalistic shitstains that you like happen to want to burn and loot on them at that moment. And yes, he SHOULD have been pointing his gun at anyone who was attacking him, as actually happened. He didn't threaten anyone, nor did the police tell him to go home. If you really feel the need to invent "facts" for yourself, at least do us all the courtesy of not insulting our intelligence by stating them in public, as if anyone is going to believe them.

Back to the couch, heifer. Those Cheetos aren't going to eat themselves.
ynsycc0nzcj71.gif
 
Being in the house and being out in public are two different things followed by two sets of different laws. In the house you may only be endangering yourself and family. When out in public we may be endangering others, especially if you have no training on when to shoot in public.

Seems to me that Kyle did an excellent job of controlling his fire. I know a lot of adults, even with training, who would not have done as well in that situation.
 
With all due respect - and I DO respect you quite a bit, Ray - I hope that you are not the person passing by on the sidewalk if I'm ever mugged. It disturbs me greatly that you think the appropriate action for a decent human being in the face of violent anarchy is to walk away from it.

And I respect you as well, but we either are going to follow our laws or we are not, we can't pick and choose which laws we want to follow in a civilized society. Such as if you are being mugged while I'm passing you, the law gives me legal rights to use my firearm to stop that mugger. The law reads that a CCW holder can use deadly force if they believe they (or others) are in jeopardy of serious bodily harm or death.
 
I ask again:
He.... ran.
They chased him and caught up with him.
What's left for him to do?

It appears that Ray thinks to qualify for self-defense, you have to try to completely leave the city every time thugs want to riot, loot, and burn.
 
Seems to me that Kyle did an excellent job of controlling his fire. I know a lot of adults, even with training, who would not have done as well in that situation.

But that's irrelevant to my point. My point is he never used the opportunity to not be in that position in the first place as the law requires. If you are armed in public, as soon as you see trouble, get the hell away from it, not involve yourself in it and then claim self-defense.
 
Back
Top Bottom