Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

Like I said I posted the laws in Wisconsin explained by two legal firms. I'll post them again when I get back home as I'm leaving in a few minutes. As I stated repeatedly, you are covered under self-defense with a deadly weapon "IF" you did everything possible to remove yourself from a situation you'd likely have to use that weapon. He did the opposite. He deliberately took a weapon into a situation where he knew he'd likely have to use it.
why wasn't evidence presented against Kyle for violating either of those two laws?
 
anyone finding Kyles trial anywhere? Im assuming it hasn't started yet.
 
It seems the prosecution is trying to get a mistrial.

What could be the motive? It is so weird.

What is amusing is that NOT ONE LEFTY will criticize the prosecutor for using KYLE'S 5TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT as an admission of guilt.

DO you commies want the 5th amendment removed? It seems you do.
 
1. Can you show the statute where your not allowed to use your firearm in defense of your life?

2. it was many more than he and his buddy…So far this young man is totally handling himself on the stand, as evidenced by the prosceutor being admonished not once but 4 times that I count…And a mistrial under consideration by the judge for the same arguments you’ve made in here.

Rittenhouse is going to be found innocent.
LOL

Dumbfuck, there's no such finding.
 
There should be a STATUE of Kyle for taking out a man who anally raped boys under the age of 11...even though that has nothing to do with the case....it is SUCH A WONDERFUL side effect.

DEAD PEDERAST!! CLEANUP ON AISLE 3!

nah, fuck it....let the worms and buzzard eat.
 
What a piece of shit this kid really is. The defense has tried to portray him as a boy scout, trying to help people, and his "breakdown" was one of the worst pieces of acting I've ever seen. One of the "excluded" pieces of evidence was that he beat up and girl and punched her in the face.

Driving without a license, on a regular basis. Buying a gun he wasn't legally old enough to buy. When the building he was supposedly "protecting" was safe, he went into the crowd, looking for trouble. Lock this piece of shit up and throw away the key.
wow...he drove without a DL....just horrible....regardless, none of that is relevant to what happened that night

let's compare him to the guy that all these riots started over...shall we?
 
May be an image of 4 people and text that says 'HE DIDN'T CRY WHEN he illegally armed himself and crossed state lines to protect property, that he neither owned, nor knew who did. He DIDN'T CRY WHEN he shot 3 people and strolled past police brandishing his illegal weapon. He DIDN'T CRY WHEN he violated the terms of his bail. He ONLY CRIED WHEN he was faced with the possibility of being held accountable for his heartless actions. OCCUPY DEMOCRATS''HE DIDN'T CRY WHEN he illegally armed himself and crossed state lines to protect property, that he neither owned, nor knew who did. He DIDN'T CRY WHEN he shot 3 people and strolled past police brandishing his illegal weapon. He DIDN'T CRY WHEN he violated the terms of his bail. He ONLY CRIED WHEN he was faced with the possibility of being held accountable for his heartless actions. OCCUPY DEMOCRATS'
May be an image of 4 people and text that says 'It's hard to take the tears of Kyle Rittenhouse seriously seeing how just a few months ago he was partying in a bar with the Proud Boys flashing their secret white power symbol while wearing a T-shirt that said 'Free as F*ck.'''It's hard to take the tears of Kyle Rittenhouse seriously seeing how just a few months ago he was partying in a bar with the Proud Boys flashing their secret white power symbol while wearing a T-shirt that said 'Free as F*ck.''
I think it's funny you all are all concerned with borders...albeit, State borders...in this case.

Funny stuff
 
I just thought of something this witness said now testifying and is describing, Kyle raised his hands to surrender, but the cop said they don't pay attention to that unless it is followed up by getting down on the ground or dropping the weapon. So the prosecution stating grosskruetz had his hands up and still holding his gun, did not remove the threat, from the cops own words, that is not considered surrender. So the prosecutor is wrong with his explanation of the encounter.
 
It seems the prosecution is trying to get a mistrial.

What could be the motive? It is so weird.

What is amusing is that NOT ONE LEFTY will criticize the prosecutor for using KYLE'S 5TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT as an admission of guilt.

DO you commies want the 5th amendment removed? It seems you do.
The motive is simple, it’s obvious to anyone with a brain that the prosecution failed to prove that Rittenhouse did anything that they charged him with and the prosecution wants a do over. A mistrial is their only chance at that. Plus a mistrial is less persuave to a civil jury than an acquittal in a trial for wrongful prosecution and prosecutorial misconduct. At this point, the trial is over and the prosecution is in damage control mode.
 
Back
Top Bottom