Kim Davis to join the GOP...

[Where_r_my_Keys]

If the "pen is mightier than the sword", who is more guilty?

Ahh, nice try. You speak of hatred, but use the pen to invoke more hatred of those you accuse of being hateful.

See where I'm going with this? You are hypocrites.

Hatred begets hatred. Your views are hateful, just as much as theirs. You are equally as intolerant.

Those who kill others for holding those views are in my mind more guilty than those with the pen. The sword is mightier than the pen, this time.

Who's claiming to be tolerant of evil? This is an evil woman.

because she is against gay marriage?...there are a lot of evil people then in this country then...and yes that includes millions from your party too...

Well yes... considering that she was in Gilligan's Party her entire life, until: today.

But let's enjoy the moment wherein The Left claims that the woman that rejects THEM... is EVIL.

So... what did she reject specifically?

The illicit use of the US Federal Judiciary, wherein a simple vote of 9 people rsulted in 5 VOTING TO OVER-TURN the DEMOCRATIC, DULY DEBATED, PASSED AND SIGNED INTO LAW BY DULY ELECTED CHIEF EXECUTIVE: Majority LEGISLATION...

OKA: THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE IN 42 STATES!
​

ROFLMNAO!

So THE "DEMOCRATS" used DECEIT, FRAUD AND IGNORANCE TO OVERTURN THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS!

And what was the critical "Thing" that REQUIRED THEM TO REJECT "DEMOCRACY"?

MEN MARRYING MEN!
The Federal Licensing of Degeneracy.​

Now, if THAT isn't EVIL ENOUGH! These same people ARE SOCIALISTS... RIGHT!

ANTI-PROFITEERS!

And they're the SAME PEOPLE promoting the Murder of BABIES SO THEY CAN SELL THEIR BODY PARTS FOR ... (YOU GUESSED IT!)

PROFIT!
​

These are the same peace loving people who are presently and quite PUBLICLY calling for the MURDER OF POLICE OFFICERS... but who in defense of those MURDERING those Police officers will readily explain that they'd be more against it if the Cops would just quit arresting people... .

So yeah... nothing particularly evil about those people. And all ya need to do to make that true, is to re-define Evil.

 

[Harry Dresden]

If the "pen is mightier than the sword", who is more guilty?

Ahh, nice try. You speak of hatred, but use the pen to invoke more hatred of those you accuse of being hateful.

See where I'm going with this? You are hypocrites.

Hatred begets hatred. Your views are hateful, just as much as theirs. You are equally as intolerant.

Those who kill others for holding those views are in my mind more guilty than those with the pen. The sword is mightier than the pen, this time.

Who's claiming to be tolerant of evil? This is an evil woman.

because she is against gay marriage?...there are a lot of evil people then in this country then...and yes that includes millions from your party too...

ISIS-lite is still an evil.

lots of people consider you evil for wanting to kill handicapped kids,you are ISIS like.....

 

[HappyJoy]

The definition of homophobe was pointed out to you and you are now tripling down.

ROFL!

WHAT?

A Re-Concession? Well isn't that precious?

Your Re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted!

OK, if that keeps the OCD demons away then I'm glad I could help.

Oh MY! The Coveted Re-re-Concession!

Your Re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

Now I'm beginning to think you need medication.

Well aren't you ADORABLE!

A Re-re-re-Concession? Seriously? (You gotta love the Masochists... they're such givers.)

Your Re-re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted!

For the Reader that came in late and haven't read that poor Prog's humiliating defeat, here's part of its problem:

She'll join the homophobic party.

There's literally no such thing as a "homophobe".

Literally, there is.

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.

Again, read a dictionary.

in the meantime, want to know what is legal for all Americans? Gay marriage! Yea! You live in a gay friendly country, enjoy.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

ROFL!

WHAT?

A Re-Concession? Well isn't that precious?

Your Re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted!

OK, if that keeps the OCD demons away then I'm glad I could help.

Oh MY! The Coveted Re-re-Concession!

Your Re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

Now I'm beginning to think you need medication.

Well aren't you ADORABLE!

A Re-re-re-Concession? Seriously? (You gotta love the Masochists... they're such givers.)

Your Re-re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted!

For the Reader that came in late and haven't read that poor Prog's humiliating defeat, here's part of its problem:

She'll join the homophobic party.

There's literally no such thing as a "homophobe".

Literally, there is.

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.

Again, read a dictionary.

in the meantime, want to know what is legal for all Americans? Gay marriage! Yea! You live in a gay friendly country, enjoy.

Reader... this is the second time that it's come to demand that the above Dictionary Definitions are false... without offering a Dictionary Definition.


I suggest you open your dictionary and simply looks the words up yourself... and in so doing you'll find out whose telling the truth.

 

[JQPublic1]

Can't blame her, you idiot dems demonized her.

That is because the Democrats believe in the Constitution and she violated it!

 

[Vandalshandle]

I hope that the door doesn't hit her in the ass on the way out....

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Can't blame her, you idiot dems demonized her.

That is because the Democrats believe in the Constitution and she violated it!

ROFLMNAO! You simply can NOT hide the idiots. They will NOT allow it!

 

[HappyJoy]

OK, if that keeps the OCD demons away then I'm glad I could help.

Oh MY! The Coveted Re-re-Concession!

Your Re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

Now I'm beginning to think you need medication.

Well aren't you ADORABLE!

A Re-re-re-Concession? Seriously? (You gotta love the Masochists... they're such givers.)

Your Re-re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted!

For the Reader that came in late and haven't read that poor Prog's humiliating defeat, here's part of its problem:

She'll join the homophobic party.

There's literally no such thing as a "homophobe".

Literally, there is.

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.

Again, read a dictionary.

in the meantime, want to know what is legal for all Americans? Gay marriage! Yea! You live in a gay friendly country, enjoy.

Reader... this is the second time that it's come to demand that the above Dictionary Definitions are false... without offering a Dictionary Definition.


I suggest you open your dictionary and simply looks the words up yourself... and in so doing you'll find out whose telling the truth.

It's been posted.

Your hang up is -phobe and you have it wrong. You are literally changing the definition of a word to suit your needs. Is there anything honest about you?

-phobe
combining form
1.
indicating a person or thing that fears or hates: Germanophobe,xenophobe

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I hope that the door doesn't hit her in the ass on the way out....

Hit her? At the rate you idiots are losing people... that door hasn't been on the hinges for a while now.

 

[JQPublic1]

Can't blame her, you idiot dems demonized her.

That is because the Democrats believe in the Constitution and she violated it!

ROFLMNAO! You simply can NOT hide the idiots. They will NOT allow it!

Heh heh heh NOW now,.... you are being a bit harsh on yourself, aren't you?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Oh MY! The Coveted Re-re-Concession!

Your Re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

Now I'm beginning to think you need medication.

Well aren't you ADORABLE!

A Re-re-re-Concession? Seriously? (You gotta love the Masochists... they're such givers.)

Your Re-re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted!

For the Reader that came in late and haven't read that poor Prog's humiliating defeat, here's part of its problem:

There's literally no such thing as a "homophobe".

Literally, there is.

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.

Again, read a dictionary.

in the meantime, want to know what is legal for all Americans? Gay marriage! Yea! You live in a gay friendly country, enjoy.

Reader... this is the second time that it's come to demand that the above Dictionary Definitions are false... without offering a Dictionary Definition.


I suggest you open your dictionary and simply looks the words up yourself... and in so doing you'll find out whose telling the truth.

It's been posted.

Your hang up is -phobe and you have it wrong. You are literally changing the definition of a word to suit your needs. Is there anything honest about you?

-phobe
combining form
1.
indicating a person or thing that fears or hates: Germanophobe,xenophobe

So a phobia is a general, rational fear... such as the fear of the clap... or the fear of having a car accident... or the fear of the house burning down.

Wherein people of sound mind, simply take measures which reduce the likelihood of being injured by such things?

Golly... it seems like a waste of time to come up with a special word, for something that is not special or otherwise unreasonable and bears no potential for the stigma that the special word induces, due to the intrinsic implication of an irrational component... which YOUR Definition says doesn't exist.

I mean the word Homophobe seems to suggest that there is something unreasonable about fearing homosexuals, clearly imparting a stigmatic implication... and this despite your definition clearly claiming that there is nothing about it that should cause anyone to think that there's anything wrong with it... the word "Phobia" merely referring to the natural sense of threat that comes from those whose behavior deviates from sound behavior within the standard designed by nature.

LOL!

Now... I take it then that you also feel that the word "HATE" also bears no irrational component, as well? Meaning that there's nothing particularly wrong with it... it's just an average dislike for something or someone.

ROFLMNAO!

Reader... There's LITERALLY no such thing as a Homophobe.

And rest assured that the fabrication of the word is a function of the irrationally intense dislike for a person or thing, OKA: Hate.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Can't blame her, you idiot dems demonized her.

That is because the Democrats believe in the Constitution and she violated it!

ROFLMNAO! You simply can NOT hide the idiots. They will NOT allow it!

Heh heh heh NOW now,.... you are being a bit harsh on yourself, aren't you?

No... Nothing harsh about me, imbecile.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

"I mean the word Homophobe seems to suggest that there is something unreasonable about fearing homosexuals..."

Which is true since there is nothing to fear.

phobia

noun
1.
a persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a compelling desire to avoid it.
the definition of phobia

 

[HappyJoy]

Now I'm beginning to think you need medication.

Well aren't you ADORABLE!

A Re-re-re-Concession? Seriously? (You gotta love the Masochists... they're such givers.)

Your Re-re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted!

For the Reader that came in late and haven't read that poor Prog's humiliating defeat, here's part of its problem:

Literally, there is.

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.

Again, read a dictionary.

in the meantime, want to know what is legal for all Americans? Gay marriage! Yea! You live in a gay friendly country, enjoy.

Reader... this is the second time that it's come to demand that the above Dictionary Definitions are false... without offering a Dictionary Definition.


I suggest you open your dictionary and simply looks the words up yourself... and in so doing you'll find out whose telling the truth.

It's been posted.

Your hang up is -phobe and you have it wrong. You are literally changing the definition of a word to suit your needs. Is there anything honest about you?

-phobe
combining form
1.
indicating a person or thing that fears or hates: Germanophobe,xenophobe

So a phobia is a general, rational fear... such as the fear of the clap... or the fear of having a car accident... or the fear of the house burning down.

Wherein people of sound mind, simply take measures which reduce the likelihood of being injured by such things?

Golly... it seems like a waste of time to come up with a special name, for something that is not special or otherwise unreasonable and bears no potential for stigma.

I mean the word Homophobe seems to suggest that there is something unreasonable about fearing homosexuals, when your definition clearly speaks to the word merely referring to the natural sense of threat that comes from those whose behavior deviates from sound behavior as designed by nature.

Now... I take it then that you also feel that the word "HATE" also bears no irrational component, as well?

ROFLMNAO!

Reader... There's LITERALLY no such thing as a Homophobe. And rest assured that the fabrication of the word is a function of the irrationally intense dislike for a person or thing, OKA: Hate.

Your argument is with the dictionary, I wish you luck. In the meantime you're a homophobe and you live in a gay friendly country. Enjoy.

 

[HappyJoy]

Can't blame her, you idiot dems demonized her.

That is because the Democrats believe in the Constitution and she violated it!

ROFLMNAO! You simply can NOT hide the idiots. They will NOT allow it!

Heh heh heh NOW now,.... you are being a bit harsh on yourself, aren't you?

No... Nothing harsh about me, imbecile.

You lack basic reading comprehension. He didn't call you harsh, he called you an idiot, idiot.

 

[oreo]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/u...riage-dispute-kim-davis-joining-gop.html?_r=0

I guess the dummies calling her a Democrat can rest their typing fingers now. She is finally switching parties BECAUSE of her stance on gay marriage.

Awww great--like we needed another right wing nut case on this side of the isle.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Heh heh heh NOW now,.... you are being a bit harsh on yourself, aren't you?

No... Nothing harsh about me, imbecile.

You lack basic reading comprehension. He didn't call you harsh, he called you an idiot, idiot.

ROFLMNAO!

You can make this crap up! "Idiot" Indeed...

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Well aren't you ADORABLE!

A Re-re-re-Concession? Seriously? (You gotta love the Masochists... they're such givers.)

Your Re-re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted!

For the Reader that came in late and haven't read that poor Prog's humiliating defeat, here's part of its problem:

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.

Again, read a dictionary.

in the meantime, want to know what is legal for all Americans? Gay marriage! Yea! You live in a gay friendly country, enjoy.

Reader... this is the second time that it's come to demand that the above Dictionary Definitions are false... without offering a Dictionary Definition.


I suggest you open your dictionary and simply looks the words up yourself... and in so doing you'll find out whose telling the truth.

It's been posted.

Your hang up is -phobe and you have it wrong. You are literally changing the definition of a word to suit your needs. Is there anything honest about you?

-phobe
combining form
1.
indicating a person or thing that fears or hates: Germanophobe,xenophobe

So a phobia is a general, rational fear... such as the fear of the clap... or the fear of having a car accident... or the fear of the house burning down.

Wherein people of sound mind, simply take measures which reduce the likelihood of being injured by such things?

Golly... it seems like a waste of time to come up with a special name, for something that is not special or otherwise unreasonable and bears no potential for stigma.

I mean the word Homophobe seems to suggest that there is something unreasonable about fearing homosexuals, when your definition clearly speaks to the word merely referring to the natural sense of threat that comes from those whose behavior deviates from sound behavior as designed by nature.

Now... I take it then that you also feel that the word "HATE" also bears no irrational component, as well?

ROFLMNAO!

Reader... There's LITERALLY no such thing as a Homophobe. And rest assured that the fabrication of the word is a function of the irrationally intense dislike for a person or thing, OKA: Hate.

Your argument is with the dictionary, I wish you luck. In the meantime you're a homophobe and you live in a gay friendly country. Enjoy.

And your Re-re-re-re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

And Reader, understand that there is LITERALLY: NO SUCH THING as a Homophobe.

 

[HappyJoy]

Heh heh heh NOW now,.... you are being a bit harsh on yourself, aren't you?

No... Nothing harsh about me, imbecile.

You lack basic reading comprehension. He didn't call you harsh, he called you an idiot, idiot.

ROFLMNAO!

You can make this crap up! "Idiot" Indeed...

Yeah, he called you an idiot and you were being harsh on yourself, not that you are harsh. Christ, smh.

 

[HappyJoy]

Again, read a dictionary.

in the meantime, want to know what is legal for all Americans? Gay marriage! Yea! You live in a gay friendly country, enjoy.

Reader... this is the second time that it's come to demand that the above Dictionary Definitions are false... without offering a Dictionary Definition.


I suggest you open your dictionary and simply looks the words up yourself... and in so doing you'll find out whose telling the truth.

It's been posted.

Your hang up is -phobe and you have it wrong. You are literally changing the definition of a word to suit your needs. Is there anything honest about you?

-phobe
combining form
1.
indicating a person or thing that fears or hates: Germanophobe,xenophobe

So a phobia is a general, rational fear... such as the fear of the clap... or the fear of having a car accident... or the fear of the house burning down.

Wherein people of sound mind, simply take measures which reduce the likelihood of being injured by such things?

Golly... it seems like a waste of time to come up with a special name, for something that is not special or otherwise unreasonable and bears no potential for stigma.

I mean the word Homophobe seems to suggest that there is something unreasonable about fearing homosexuals, when your definition clearly speaks to the word merely referring to the natural sense of threat that comes from those whose behavior deviates from sound behavior as designed by nature.

Now... I take it then that you also feel that the word "HATE" also bears no irrational component, as well?

ROFLMNAO!

Reader... There's LITERALLY no such thing as a Homophobe. And rest assured that the fabrication of the word is a function of the irrationally intense dislike for a person or thing, OKA: Hate.

Your argument is with the dictionary, I wish you luck. In the meantime you're a homophobe and you live in a gay friendly country. Enjoy.

And your Re-re-re-re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

And Reader, understand that there is LITERALLY: NO SUCH THING as a Homophobe.

Enjoy the little world you created for yourself.