Kim Davis to join the GOP...

[HappyJoy]

Keys,

Can you post an opinion that you think most Americans would agree with? I absolutely believe there has to be something and I'm curious what you think that would be.

 

[JakeStarkey]

She was a far right reactionary but Demo in name.

Now she is with a far right group.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

ROFLMNAO!

See how CLOSE we are?

They're now incapable of discriminating... they truly have no problem now PUBLICLY PROMOTING DEGENERACY.

Oh... it shouldn't be long now.

I thought you would have already believed we are openly promoting degeneracy. Hence you and your ridiculous posts.

Oh you've been doing so in hopes of the licensing of such... now you're doing it in the wake of licensing.

If you were capable of understanding the distinction... you wouldn't be doing so.

Riiight.

See?
ROFL! I say it HERE and it comes out ^ THERE ^ ... .

Once again, your post isn't changing any minds.

ROFL!

I have no desire to change your minds.

My purpose here is to encourage Relativists TO SPEAK.

As in so doing, the Reader is exposed to the unenviable consequences of Relativism.

The simple truth is that if you were capable of rising above the starkly limited, unprincipled notions of Left-think... ya would.

My purpose here, is to give those who come through here, WHO HAVE the means to avoid falling for your nonsense, the CHANCE to do so.

I don't get to choose who they are, or what they decide. My task is to simply expose them to sound reasoning and to allow them to compare it to the idiocy that you're pushing.

So the reader comes in... they have children and like any parent, they want the best for their children... they read what you say and my correction of your ruse... then they decide; does a world collapsing into degeneracy provide the best chance for their children's viability, happiness and the means to provide for a life of their own and to raise their own children?

Odds are they haven't given a lot of this stuff a ton of thought... so they've been following along with the trite populism that is ever present... their hart tugging to the poor Polar Bear apparently stuck on a Iceberg in the middle of the cold, cold ocean.

Then they read my writing which explained the 120 mile swim typical of Polar bear feeding... the physiological composition of the polar bear that sets it quite comfortable in freezing water... indefinitely. So their interests are piqued: "That's not what they told my child... did they lie to my child?" And they go do the research themselves... where they learn that 'they did indeed lie to their child... and what's worse... they conned her into lying to her child.

And so it begins... the making of yet another sustainable human being that may have otherwise been lost to the Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance that you're selling.

See how that works?

 

[HappyJoy]

I thought you would have already believed we are openly promoting degeneracy. Hence you and your ridiculous posts.

Oh you've been doing so in hopes of the licensing of such... now you're doing it in the wake of licensing.

If you were capable of understanding the distinction... you wouldn't be doing so.

Riiight.

See?
ROFL! I say it HERE and it comes out ^ THERE ^ ... .

Once again, your post isn't changing any minds.

ROFL!

I have no desire to change minds.

My purpose here is to encourage Relativists TO SPEAK.

As in so doing, the Reader is exposed to the unenviable consequences of Relativism.

The simple truth is that if you were capable of rising above the starkly limited, unprincipled notions of Left-think... ya would.

My purpose here, is to give those who come through here, WHO HAVE the means to avoid falling for your nonsense, the CHANCE to do so.

I don't get to choose who they are, or what they decide. My task is to simply expose them to sound reasoning and to allow them to compare it to the idiocy that you're pushing.

So the reader comes in... they have children and like any parent, they want the best for their children... they read what you say and my correction of your ruse... then they decide; does a world collapsing into degeneracy provide the best chance for their children's viability, happiness and the means to provide for a life of their own and to raise their own children?

Odds are they haven't given a lot of this stuff a ton of thought... so they've been following along with the trite populism that is ever present... their hart tugging to the poor Polar Bear apparently stuck on a Iceberg in the middle of the cold, cold ocean.

Then they read my writing which explained the 120 mile swim typical of Polar bear feeding... the physiological composition of the polar bear that sets it quite comfortable in freezing water... indefinitely. So their interests are piqued: "That's not what they told my child... did they lie to my child?" And they go do the research themselves... where they learn that 'they did indeed lie to their child... and what's worse... they conned her into lying to her child.

And so it begins... the making of yet another sustainable human being that may have otherwise been lost to the Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance that you're selling.

See how that works?

I'm referring to "the reader".

 

[HappyJoy]

Keys,

Can you post an opinion that you think most Americans would agree with? I absolutely believe there has to be something and I'm curious what you think that would be.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Oh you've been doing so in hopes of the licensing of such... now you're doing it in the wake of licensing.

If you were capable of understanding the distinction... you wouldn't be doing so.

Riiight.

See?
ROFL! I say it HERE and it comes out ^ THERE ^ ... .

Once again, your post isn't changing any minds.

ROFL!

I have no desire to change minds.

My purpose here is to encourage Relativists TO SPEAK.

As in so doing, the Reader is exposed to the unenviable consequences of Relativism.

The simple truth is that if you were capable of rising above the starkly limited, unprincipled notions of Left-think... ya would.

My purpose here, is to give those who come through here, WHO HAVE the means to avoid falling for your nonsense, the CHANCE to do so.

I don't get to choose who they are, or what they decide. My task is to simply expose them to sound reasoning and to allow them to compare it to the idiocy that you're pushing.

So the reader comes in... they have children and like any parent, they want the best for their children... they read what you say and my correction of your ruse... then they decide; does a world collapsing into degeneracy provide the best chance for their children's viability, happiness and the means to provide for a life of their own and to raise their own children?

Odds are they haven't given a lot of this stuff a ton of thought... so they've been following along with the trite populism that is ever present... their hart tugging to the poor Polar Bear apparently stuck on a Iceberg in the middle of the cold, cold ocean.

Then they read my writing which explained the 120 mile swim typical of Polar bear feeding... the physiological composition of the polar bear that sets it quite comfortable in freezing water... indefinitely. So their interests are piqued: "That's not what they told my child... did they lie to my child?" And they go do the research themselves... where they learn that 'they did indeed lie to their child... and what's worse... they conned her into lying to her child.

And so it begins... the making of yet another sustainable human being that may have otherwise been lost to the Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance that you're selling.

See how that works?

I'm referring to "the reader".

ROFLMNAO!

So you control the Reader do ya? Well ... aren't you special?

Let's put it this way... I'm perfectly comfortable with the Reader reading... and making up their own mind.

You seem to be less so... and we can know this by your demand that the Reader must conclude what YOU CONCLUDE... or (And this is my favorite part) you'll need to claim that THERE IS NO READER! ( I realize ya didn't say that there was no reader, if the reader doesn't agree with you. But there's no other logical extension to your stated position... meaning that you either believe that you control the Reader's mind, which literally presents you being psychotic... which you're not. You're a sociopath, who is, at least in your writing, does not present psychotic. Merely consumed with your own needs and incapable of empathy for the differing ideas of others.

It's a very common mental disorder and the same one that also presents with sexual deviancy in some people... .

Now wouldn't this be cool if you had ANY means to understand any of it?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Keys,

Can you post an opinion that you think most Americans would agree with? I absolutely believe there has to be something and I'm curious what you think that would be.

I can post a position that I KNOW 100% of Americans agree with.

 

[HappyJoy]

Keys,

Can you post an opinion that you think most Americans would agree with? I absolutely believe there has to be something and I'm curious what you think that would be.

I can post a position that I KNOW 100% of Americans agree with.

OK. And to be clear when i say "American" I don't want some weird ass construed definition that you pull out of your butt. I mean U.S. citizens.

 

[HappyJoy]

Riiight.

See?
ROFL! I say it HERE and it comes out ^ THERE ^ ... .

Once again, your post isn't changing any minds.

ROFL!

I have no desire to change minds.

My purpose here is to encourage Relativists TO SPEAK.

As in so doing, the Reader is exposed to the unenviable consequences of Relativism.

The simple truth is that if you were capable of rising above the starkly limited, unprincipled notions of Left-think... ya would.

My purpose here, is to give those who come through here, WHO HAVE the means to avoid falling for your nonsense, the CHANCE to do so.

I don't get to choose who they are, or what they decide. My task is to simply expose them to sound reasoning and to allow them to compare it to the idiocy that you're pushing.

So the reader comes in... they have children and like any parent, they want the best for their children... they read what you say and my correction of your ruse... then they decide; does a world collapsing into degeneracy provide the best chance for their children's viability, happiness and the means to provide for a life of their own and to raise their own children?

Odds are they haven't given a lot of this stuff a ton of thought... so they've been following along with the trite populism that is ever present... their hart tugging to the poor Polar Bear apparently stuck on a Iceberg in the middle of the cold, cold ocean.

Then they read my writing which explained the 120 mile swim typical of Polar bear feeding... the physiological composition of the polar bear that sets it quite comfortable in freezing water... indefinitely. So their interests are piqued: "That's not what they told my child... did they lie to my child?" And they go do the research themselves... where they learn that 'they did indeed lie to their child... and what's worse... they conned her into lying to her child.

And so it begins... the making of yet another sustainable human being that may have otherwise been lost to the Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance that you're selling.

See how that works?

I'm referring to "the reader".

ROFLMNAO!

So you control the Reader do ya? Well ... aren't you special?

Let's put it this way... I'm perfectly comfortable with the Reader reading... and making up their own mind.

You seem to be less so... and we can know this by your demand that the Reader must conclude what YOU CONCLUDE... or (And this is my favorite part) THERE IS NO READER! ( I realize ya didn't say that there was no reader, if the reader doesn't agree with you. But there's no other logical extension to your stated position... meaning that you either believe that you control the Reader's mind, which literally presents you being psychotic... which you're not. You're a sociopath, who is, at least in your writing, does not present psychotic. Merely consumed with your own needs and incapable of empathy for the differing ideas of others.

It's a very common mental disorder and the same one that also presents with sexual deviancy in some people... .

Now wouldn't this be cool if you had ANY means to understand any of it?

I see, you control the reader? I'm just asking for some evidence that this fantastical reader who hangs on your every word is really there.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Keys,

Can you post an opinion that you think most Americans would agree with? I absolutely believe there has to be something and I'm curious what you think that would be.

I can post a position that I KNOW 100% of Americans agree with.

OK. And to be clear when i say "American" I don't want some weird ass construed definition that you pull out of your butt. I mean U.S. citizens.

ROFL!

Of course you do.

Sadly for your erroneous 'feelings' being a US Citizen does not equate to being an American.

Americans are thsoe who recognize, respect, defend and adhere to the principles that define America.

According to most polls on the subject, 20-25% of US Citizens have no idea what American principle IS.

You're one of those... .

Here allow me to demonstrate:

HappyJoy, what are the principles that define America?​

 

[HappyJoy]

Keys,

Can you post an opinion that you think most Americans would agree with? I absolutely believe there has to be something and I'm curious what you think that would be.

I can post a position that I KNOW 100% of Americans agree with.

OK. And to be clear when i say "American" I don't want some weird ass construed definition that you pull out of your butt. I mean U.S. citizens.

ROFL!

Of course you do.

Sadly for your erroneous 'feelings' being a US Citizen does not equate to being an American.

Americans are thsoe who recognize, respect, defend and adhere to the principles that define America.

According to most polls on the subject, 20-25% of US Citizens have no idea what American principle IS.

You're one of those... .

Here allow me to demonstrate:

HappyJoy, what are the principles that define America?​

Right. You see, what you consider American is irrelevant to me, it means absolutely nothing. So, let's keep it to U.S. citizens, better yet, voters. What views do you hold that a majority of voters would agree with?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

See?
ROFL! I say it HERE and it comes out ^ THERE ^ ... .

Once again, your post isn't changing any minds.

ROFL!

I have no desire to change minds.

My purpose here is to encourage Relativists TO SPEAK.

As in so doing, the Reader is exposed to the unenviable consequences of Relativism.

The simple truth is that if you were capable of rising above the starkly limited, unprincipled notions of Left-think... ya would.

My purpose here, is to give those who come through here, WHO HAVE the means to avoid falling for your nonsense, the CHANCE to do so.

I don't get to choose who they are, or what they decide. My task is to simply expose them to sound reasoning and to allow them to compare it to the idiocy that you're pushing.

So the reader comes in... they have children and like any parent, they want the best for their children... they read what you say and my correction of your ruse... then they decide; does a world collapsing into degeneracy provide the best chance for their children's viability, happiness and the means to provide for a life of their own and to raise their own children?

Odds are they haven't given a lot of this stuff a ton of thought... so they've been following along with the trite populism that is ever present... their hart tugging to the poor Polar Bear apparently stuck on a Iceberg in the middle of the cold, cold ocean.

Then they read my writing which explained the 120 mile swim typical of Polar bear feeding... the physiological composition of the polar bear that sets it quite comfortable in freezing water... indefinitely. So their interests are piqued: "That's not what they told my child... did they lie to my child?" And they go do the research themselves... where they learn that 'they did indeed lie to their child... and what's worse... they conned her into lying to her child.

And so it begins... the making of yet another sustainable human being that may have otherwise been lost to the Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance that you're selling.

See how that works?

I'm referring to "the reader".

ROFLMNAO!

So you control the Reader do ya? Well ... aren't you special?

Let's put it this way... I'm perfectly comfortable with the Reader reading... and making up their own mind.

You seem to be less so... and we can know this by your demand that the Reader must conclude what YOU CONCLUDE... or (And this is my favorite part) THERE IS NO READER! ( I realize ya didn't say that there was no reader, if the reader doesn't agree with you. But there's no other logical extension to your stated position... meaning that you either believe that you control the Reader's mind, which literally presents you being psychotic... which you're not. You're a sociopath, who is, at least in your writing, does not present psychotic. Merely consumed with your own needs and incapable of empathy for the differing ideas of others.

It's a very common mental disorder and the same one that also presents with sexual deviancy in some people... .

Now wouldn't this be cool if you had ANY means to understand any of it?

I see, you control the reader?

ROFL! You're asking due to the total absence of options.

There's nothing in the positions that I stated that in any way suggests that I feel that I control the Reader.

You're the one that asserted, as FACT, that I wasn't changing minds... and that in stating this, you were referring to the READER. Thus asserting that you have some control over the Reader's mind.

You recognize that the Reader also read this and came to the same conclusion... because you came to that conclusion... and now you're attempting to obfuscate through the attempt to deceive the Reader.

Again... I'm perfectly fine with the Reader considering what I say and what you say. And letting them make up their own mind. They're also free to engage the discussion and test us respectively... .

I am confident in my means to sustain my positions, as my positions are long considered and rest in sound logical constructs. You on the other hand construct your reasoning in unsound, fallacious constructs, appealing in nearly every post to popularity, misleading authority, ignorance and a host of other just a fatally flawed constructs.

So all the Reader need to see my point is the intellectual means to bring an open, objective heart and mind.

YOU require them to be something less enviable... but significantly more common.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Keys,

Can you post an opinion that you think most Americans would agree with? I absolutely believe there has to be something and I'm curious what you think that would be.

I can post a position that I KNOW 100% of Americans agree with.

OK. And to be clear when i say "American" I don't want some weird ass construed definition that you pull out of your butt. I mean U.S. citizens.

ROFL!

Of course you do.

Sadly for your erroneous 'feelings' being a US Citizen does not equate to being an American.

Americans are thsoe who recognize, respect, defend and adhere to the principles that define America.

According to most polls on the subject, 20-25% of US Citizens have no idea what American principle IS.

You're one of those... .

Here allow me to demonstrate:

HappyJoy, what are the principles that define America?​

Right. You see, what you consider American is irrelevant to me, it means absolutely nothing. So, let's keep it to U.S. citizens, better yet, voters. What views do you hold that a majority of voters would agree with?

ROFLMNAO!

So you can't tell the Reader what American Principle IS... but you expect the Reader to believe that YOU are an American.

Reader... If someone asks you to believe that they're a US Marine, but they can't tell you what the Principles of Being a Marine are ... would you believe that they're a Marine?

If someone tells you that they're a Christian... but they can't tell you what being a Christian is and demand that such is limited to being a member of the Church. Would ya put much credence in their claim?

If a person says that they're a Member of the ELKS... Boy Scouts, AAA Club... but they can't tell you what any one of those things MEANS. You'd agree that there's little chance that they've any affiliation with those institutions, wouldn't you?

Same here.

Again Reader... What you've witnessed above is simply more evidence of the natural certainty that:

THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS!
​

And this is because Nature precludes the means to simultaneously adhere to both the THESIS and the Antithesis... it simply can NOT be done.


Remember: the key to defeating Leftists in debate, rests in two fundamental elements:

1- Find a Leftist.
2- Get them to Speak.

 

[OnePercenter]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/u...riage-dispute-kim-davis-joining-gop.html?_r=0

I guess the dummies calling her a Democrat can rest their typing fingers now. She is finally switching parties BECAUSE of her stance on gay marriage.

She'll join the homophobic party.

 

[HappyJoy]

Once again, your post isn't changing any minds.

ROFL!

I have no desire to change minds.

My purpose here is to encourage Relativists TO SPEAK.

As in so doing, the Reader is exposed to the unenviable consequences of Relativism.

The simple truth is that if you were capable of rising above the starkly limited, unprincipled notions of Left-think... ya would.

My purpose here, is to give those who come through here, WHO HAVE the means to avoid falling for your nonsense, the CHANCE to do so.

I don't get to choose who they are, or what they decide. My task is to simply expose them to sound reasoning and to allow them to compare it to the idiocy that you're pushing.

So the reader comes in... they have children and like any parent, they want the best for their children... they read what you say and my correction of your ruse... then they decide; does a world collapsing into degeneracy provide the best chance for their children's viability, happiness and the means to provide for a life of their own and to raise their own children?

Odds are they haven't given a lot of this stuff a ton of thought... so they've been following along with the trite populism that is ever present... their hart tugging to the poor Polar Bear apparently stuck on a Iceberg in the middle of the cold, cold ocean.

Then they read my writing which explained the 120 mile swim typical of Polar bear feeding... the physiological composition of the polar bear that sets it quite comfortable in freezing water... indefinitely. So their interests are piqued: "That's not what they told my child... did they lie to my child?" And they go do the research themselves... where they learn that 'they did indeed lie to their child... and what's worse... they conned her into lying to her child.

And so it begins... the making of yet another sustainable human being that may have otherwise been lost to the Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance that you're selling.

See how that works?

I'm referring to "the reader".

ROFLMNAO!

So you control the Reader do ya? Well ... aren't you special?

Let's put it this way... I'm perfectly comfortable with the Reader reading... and making up their own mind.

You seem to be less so... and we can know this by your demand that the Reader must conclude what YOU CONCLUDE... or (And this is my favorite part) THERE IS NO READER! ( I realize ya didn't say that there was no reader, if the reader doesn't agree with you. But there's no other logical extension to your stated position... meaning that you either believe that you control the Reader's mind, which literally presents you being psychotic... which you're not. You're a sociopath, who is, at least in your writing, does not present psychotic. Merely consumed with your own needs and incapable of empathy for the differing ideas of others.

It's a very common mental disorder and the same one that also presents with sexual deviancy in some people... .

Now wouldn't this be cool if you had ANY means to understand any of it?

I see, you control the reader?

ROFL! You're asking due to the total absence of options.

There's nothing in the positions that I stated that in any way suggests that I feel that I control the Reader.

You're the one that asserted, as FACT, that I wasn't changing minds... and that in stating this, you were referring to the READER. Thus asserting that you have some control over the Reader's mind.

You recognize that the Reader also read this and came to the same conclusion... because you came to that conclusion... and now you're attempting to obfuscate through the attempt to deceive the Reader.

Again... I'm perfectly fine with the Reader considering what I say and what you say. And letting them make up their own mind. They're also free to engage the discussion and test us respectively... .

I am confident in my means to sustain my positions, as my positions are long considered and rest in sound logical constructs. You on the other hand construct your reasoning in unsound, fallacious constructs, appealing in nearly every post to popularity, misleading authority, ignorance and a host of other just a fatally flawed constructs.

So all the Reader need to see my point is the intellectual means to bring an open, objective heart and mind.

YOU require them to be something less enviable... but significantly more common.

I simply asked a question about your imaginary audience that you are speaking to as though the two of you are in on some inside joke. I merely asked if you thought you controlled him/her/it. That is all, there is no reason to go goofy as **** in every single post you create.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

She'll join the homophobic party.

There's literally no such thing as a "homophobe".

 

[HappyJoy]

Keys,

Can you post an opinion that you think most Americans would agree with? I absolutely believe there has to be something and I'm curious what you think that would be.

I can post a position that I KNOW 100% of Americans agree with.

OK. And to be clear when i say "American" I don't want some weird ass construed definition that you pull out of your butt. I mean U.S. citizens.

ROFL!

Of course you do.

Sadly for your erroneous 'feelings' being a US Citizen does not equate to being an American.

Americans are thsoe who recognize, respect, defend and adhere to the principles that define America.

According to most polls on the subject, 20-25% of US Citizens have no idea what American principle IS.

You're one of those... .

Here allow me to demonstrate:

HappyJoy, what are the principles that define America?​

Right. You see, what you consider American is irrelevant to me, it means absolutely nothing. So, let's keep it to U.S. citizens, better yet, voters. What views do you hold that a majority of voters would agree with?

ROFLMNAO!

So you can't tell the Reader what American Principle IS... but you expect the Reader to believe that YOU are an American.

Reader... If someone asks you to believe that they're a US Marine, but they can't tell you what the Principles of Being a Marine are ... would you believe that they're a Marine?

If someone tells you that they're a Christian... but they can't tell you what being a Christian is and demand that such is limited to being a member of the Church. Would ya put much credence in their claim?

If a person says that they're a Member of the ELKS... Boy Scouts, AAA Club... but they can't tell you what any one of those things MEANS. You'd agree that there's little chance that they've any affiliation with those institutions, wouldn't you?

Same here.

Again Reader... What you've witnessed above is simply more evidence of the natural certainty that:

THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS!
​

And this is because Nature precludes the means to simultaneously adhere to both the THESIS and the Antithesis... it simply can NOT be done.


Remember: the key to defeating Leftists in debate, rests in two fundamental elements:

1- Find a Leftist.
2- Get them to Speak.

I'm asking what you believe in that a majority of U.S. citizens would agree with you on. That is all. Not trying to convince your imaginary friend of anything.

 

[HappyJoy]

She'll join the homophobic party.

There's literally no such thing as a "homophobe".

Literally, there is.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

ROFLMNAO!

I say it HERE:

... You seem to be less so... and we can know this by your demand that the Reader must conclude what YOU CONCLUDE... or (And this is my favorite part) you'll need to claim that THERE IS NO READER!...

And it COMES OUT THERE!:

I simply asked a question about your imaginary audience... .

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

She'll join the homophobic party.

There's literally no such thing as a "homophobe".

Literally, there is.

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.