Kim Davis to join the GOP...

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I'm asking what you believe in that a majority of U.S. citizens would agree with you on.

And you're asking this because of you erroneous belief that a popularly held position, is a valid position. A fallacious construct which rests in the appeal to popularity, wherein the speaker appeals to what it believes is popularly accepted, on the basis that most people want to be seen as being mainstream...thus tend to publicly lend assent to what they believe are popularly held views.

This being a holdover trait from the mammalian genes which produce the need for collective gathering; wherein safety is found in numbers.

Americans are found with genes which promote a more individualistic tendency... where freedom is preferred over safety and, who more commonly associate "the Herd" with: FOOD!

 

[PaintMyHouse]

She'll join the homophobic party.

There's literally no such thing as a "homophobe".

Literally, there is.

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.

the definition of homophobe
homophobe | a person who hates or is afraid of homosexuals or treats them badly

 

[HappyJoy]

ROFLMNAO!

I say it HERE:

... You seem to be less so... and we can know this by your demand that the Reader must conclude what YOU CONCLUDE... or (And this is my favorite part) you'll need to claim that THERE IS NO READER!...

And it COMES OUT THERE!:

I simply asked a question about your imaginary audience... .

I have no idea what anyone who reads this shit concludes but it's obvious it's very important to you and you seem to have a very specific (and why I say imaginary) person in mind. Anyway, for someone who says they don't care who agrees with them, you sure want this ghost to.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Reader, go back through the last few pages and look for the little smiley faces, from the Progressives, who wanted to contest the position, but who lacked the courage of their convictions to engage the argument.

This is the Appeal to Popularity, expressed through other means.

And it is evidence of the position I advanced above... they truly are helpless.

 

[HappyJoy]

She'll join the homophobic party.

There's literally no such thing as a "homophobe".

Literally, there is.

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.

You sure go out of your way to be proven wrong. Not only do you have imaginary friends but you seem to have a made up dictionary too.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I have no idea ... .

To say the least... . But at least on this, we can agree.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

She'll join the homophobic party.

There's literally no such thing as a "homophobe".

Literally, there is.

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.

You sure go out of your way to be proven wrong. Not only do you have imaginary friends but you seem to have a made up dictionary too.

Well aren't you sweet to say so?

Your concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

(Reader, ignorance can't be faked at that depth... it's as close to a stone, as something that close to human can get.)

 

[HappyJoy]

I'm asking what you believe in that a majority of U.S. citizens would agree with you on.

And you're asking this because of you erroneous belief that a popularly held position, is a valid position. A fallacious construct which rests in the appeal to popularity, wherein the speaker appeals to what it believes is popularly accepted, on the basis that most people want to be seen as being mainstream...thus tend to publicly lend assent to what they believe are popularly held views.

This being a holdover trait from the mammalian genes which produce the need for collective gathering; wherein safety is found in numbers.

Americans are found with genes which promote a more individualistic tendency... where freedom is preferred over safety and, who more commonly associate "the Herd" with: FOOD!

No. We both know that your views are abhorrent to most Americans, even to the point where you have a rather bizarre definition as to what an American is just to skew the scale of how ridiculous you really are. But, I'm curious about how your opinions crash and die in the face of of a representative democracy.

 

[HappyJoy]

I have no idea ... .

To say the least... . But at least on this, we can agree.

There you go again, not having a point.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

For Keys: the definition of dictionary

 

[HappyJoy]

She'll join the homophobic party.

There's literally no such thing as a "homophobe".

Literally, there is.

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.

You sure go out of your way to be proven wrong. Not only do you have imaginary friends but you seem to have a made up dictionary too.

Well aren't you sweet to say so?

Your concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

The definition of homophobe was pointed out to you and you are now tripling down.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

No. We both know that your views are abhorrent to most Americans...

You can't even tell this board what American principles are... now you're telling the Reader that you can identify Americans??

If ya don't know what Americans are... how would ya know that they'd be such?

But I tell ya what... you go find an American and have them come here and tell me why they disagree with something I said. After that, you can go find another one, until you get to most of 'em... .

But the hardest step on any journey is the first... so ya best get started. You've got a long trip ahead of ya.

Bon Voyage!

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

There's literally no such thing as a "homophobe".

Literally, there is.

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.

You sure go out of your way to be proven wrong. Not only do you have imaginary friends but you seem to have a made up dictionary too.

Well aren't you sweet to say so?

Your concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

The definition of homophobe was pointed out to you and you are now tripling down.

ROFL!

WHAT?

A Re-Concession? Well isn't that precious?

Your Re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted!

And just so ya know: There is Literally NO SUCH THING as a: HomoPhobe.

 

[Harry Dresden]

She would probably be even MORE accepted had she joined ISIS.

Now that's funny.

It's also funny how none of you condemn ISIS for its views on homosexuals, but are willing to wage war on a single person for holding to their religious beliefs. Tell me, you impetuous little troll, where's that tolerance of yours?

I mean, when you have no argument, you either compare people to terrorists... or to Hitler, like Debbie Wasserman Schultz did to Marco Rubio.

It's about time I put you on my ignore list.

because he said something you dont like?.....geezus....talk about tolerance.....

Look, there are limits to my patience, Harry. When you (not you specifically) compare someone to a group of terrorists, you have crossed a line and are no longer worthy of a response. It's childish, impudent talk that I won't abide by. If you can't attack someone on the merits of their argument, there's no more need for me to acknowledge you.

It has nothing to do with whether I liked what he said or not. It's offensive to the highest order to compare someone with people who routinely slaughter people who don't align with their twisted morals.

you were talking about nats lack of tolerance up above about religious beliefs.....and then showed us you lacking tolerance for what he said....you are either a tolerant person or you are not...well i guess you can be a selective tolerant person...

 

[HappyJoy]

Literally, there is.

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.

You sure go out of your way to be proven wrong. Not only do you have imaginary friends but you seem to have a made up dictionary too.

Well aren't you sweet to say so?

Your concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

The definition of homophobe was pointed out to you and you are now tripling down.

ROFL!

WHAT?

A Re-Concession? Well isn't that precious?

Your Re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted!

OK, if that keeps the OCD demons away then I'm glad I could help.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.

You sure go out of your way to be proven wrong. Not only do you have imaginary friends but you seem to have a made up dictionary too.

Well aren't you sweet to say so?

Your concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

The definition of homophobe was pointed out to you and you are now tripling down.

ROFL!

WHAT?

A Re-Concession? Well isn't that precious?

Your Re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted!

OK, if that keeps the OCD demons away then I'm glad I could help.

Oh MY! The Coveted Re-re-Concession!

Your Re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

 

[HappyJoy]

You sure go out of your way to be proven wrong. Not only do you have imaginary friends but you seem to have a made up dictionary too.

Well aren't you sweet to say so?

Your concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

The definition of homophobe was pointed out to you and you are now tripling down.

ROFL!

WHAT?

A Re-Concession? Well isn't that precious?

Your Re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted!

OK, if that keeps the OCD demons away then I'm glad I could help.

Oh MY! The Coveted Re-re-Concession!

Your Re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

Now I'm beginning to think you need medication.

 

[Harry Dresden]

If the "pen is mightier than the sword", who is more guilty?

Ahh, nice try. You speak of hatred, but use the pen to invoke more hatred of those you accuse of being hateful.

See where I'm going with this? You are hypocrites.

Hatred begets hatred. Your views are hateful, just as much as theirs. You are equally as intolerant.

Those who kill others for holding those views are in my mind more guilty than those with the pen. The sword is mightier than the pen, this time.

Who's claiming to be tolerant of evil? This is an evil woman.

because she is against gay marriage?...there are a lot of evil people then in this country then...and yes that includes millions from your party too...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

If the "pen is mightier than the sword", who is more guilty?

Ahh, nice try. You speak of hatred, but use the pen to invoke more hatred of those you accuse of being hateful.

See where I'm going with this? You are hypocrites.

Hatred begets hatred. Your views are hateful, just as much as theirs. You are equally as intolerant.

Those who kill others for holding those views are in my mind more guilty than those with the pen. The sword is mightier than the pen, this time.

Who's claiming to be tolerant of evil? This is an evil woman.

because she is against gay marriage?...there are a lot of evil people then in this country then...and yes that includes millions from your party too...

ISIS-lite is still an evil.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Well aren't you sweet to say so?

Your concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

The definition of homophobe was pointed out to you and you are now tripling down.

ROFL!

WHAT?

A Re-Concession? Well isn't that precious?

Your Re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted!

OK, if that keeps the OCD demons away then I'm glad I could help.

Oh MY! The Coveted Re-re-Concession!

Your Re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.

Now I'm beginning to think you need medication.

Well aren't you ADORABLE!

A Re-re-re-Concession? Seriously? (You gotta love the Masochists... they're such givers.)

Your Re-re-re-Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted!

For the Reader that came in late and haven't read that poor Prog's humiliating defeat, here's part of its problem:

She'll join the homophobic party.

There's literally no such thing as a "homophobe".

Literally, there is.

No... there literally, is not.

But in fairness to you, as an imbecile... there is NO Way that you could have known that.

"Homophobe" is a colloquialism. Which is to say: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary; not to be taken literally... typically one used in ordinary or familiar conversation.

Homo-: relating to same.

Phobe: One presenting symptomatic of a phobia.

Phobia: an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.

Homo-Phobe: One presenting an extreme or irrational fear of same.

Now, you're likely thinking that the phobia is relevant to "Homosexual"... using the prefix "Homo-" in the colloquial usage where 'same-sexual' is shortened, and the meaning of the word set aside for the popular, colloquial usage.

Fine...

Then a Homo-phobe would be one with an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuals.

There is no known medical examples of such a phobia.

You're merely conflating the rejection of normalizing the sexual deviancy OKA: Homosexuality, with an extreme or irrational fear.

Wherein again... there is no medical demonstration of a soundly reasoned contestant being found presenting an irrational fear.

There are however, no end to the medical examples of sociopaths conflating soundly reasoned positions as irrational... and this board is LOADED with 'em; with your post-history being a classic example of just that.