Annie
Diamond Member
- Nov 22, 2003
- 50,848
- 4,828
- 1,790
Lots of links, scroll down nearly a 1/4 way down: http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110005529
Excerpt:
Excerpt:
'A Charm Vacuum'
We were traveling earlier this week, so we missed John Kerry's appearance on Comedy Central's "The Daily Show" with Jon Stewart. But something tells us the show was a lot less entertaining than Dana Stevens's review of it in Slate. That something is Stevens's review itself. As you read this, keep in mind that she's a Kerry supporter :
Kerry's charisma was less than zero: It was negative. He was a charm vacuum, forced to actually borrow mojo from audience members. He was a dessicated [sic] husk, a tin man who really didn't have a heart. His lack of vibrancy, his utter dearth of sex appeal made Al Gore look like Charo.
(Metaphor alert: Stevens goes on to say: "Watching Kerry strike out was especially heartbreaking given that Stewart was pitching not just softballs but marshmallows. Puffy interview marshmallows with rainbow sprinkles on them, and Kerry was letting them sail by as if he planned to get to first base on a walk. That may be how he hopes to win the presidency as well, but before he gets there, he'll have to jump through hoops a lot tougher than this exchange.")
Stevens also asks, "Can we really trust our future to a man who fails to see the humor in the following exchange?":
Kerry: You'd be amazed the number of people who wanna introduce themselves to you in the men's room. [laughter]
Stewart: Really?
Kerry: God. It--it's the most bizarre part of this entire campaign.
No doubt this is Kerry's clumsy effort to prove he's no Sitzpinkler. Stevens also notes that despite the damage the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth have done to him, Kerry has failed to understand that his "war hero" act has worn thin (emphasis in original):
When the interview was over and Kerry rose to leave, he caused audible groans in my household by saluting the audience (just as he did at the opening of his convention speech: "John Kerry reporting for duty." Lieutenant Kerry, your first order is to stop saluting the audience. It makes you look like a total tool).
Actually, we'd say "tool" is too mild. Ralph Peters, a retired Army officer and reluctant Bush backer, puts his finger on what's wrong with Kerry's Vietnam braggadocio--a point, he notes, that "pundits have trouble grasping, given the self-promoting nature of today's culture" (emphasis in original):
Real heroes don't call themselves heroes. Honorable soldiers or sailors don't brag. They let their deeds speak for themselves. Some of the most off-putting words any veteran can utter are "I'm a war hero."
Real heroes (and I've been honored to know some) never portray their service in grandiose terms, telling TV cameras that they're reporting for duty. Real heroes may be proud of the sacrifices they offered, but they don't shout for attention.
This is so profoundly a part of the military code of behavior that it cannot be over-emphasized. The rule is that those who brag about being heroes usually aren't heroes at all. Bragging is for drunks at the end of the bar, not for real vets. And certainly not for anyone who wishes to trade on his service to become our commander-in-chief.
A lot of Kerry supporters seem genuinely mystified as to why veterans would not prefer John Kerry, who by the way served in Vietnam, to George W. Bush, whose military service was stateside. Most of these same people, of course, backed Bill Clinton against his World War II hero opponents in both 1992 and 1996, so it's not that they think military service is all that important as a qualification for the presidency. It's just that they're blind to the nuances of military culture--as, it would seem, is Kerry himself.