Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 89,010
- 67,004
- 3,565
No, I’m telling you like it isNope, you are repeating shit that's directly contradicted by contemporaneous press releases, BY THE NATIONAL GUARD itself.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, I’m telling you like it isNope, you are repeating shit that's directly contradicted by contemporaneous press releases, BY THE NATIONAL GUARD itself.
That's what eligible means. Definition of ELIGIBLEMembers who accumulate 20 or more years of active service are eligible for retirement.
The key word there is “eligible”
Walz couldn't just quit whenever he felt like it
What it is, is that you're willing to claim ignorance of the English language in order to support your narrative.No, I’m telling you like it is
So Walz can just shirk his duties as the top kick in his unit and fail to report for duty one morning?That's what eligible means. Definition of ELIGIBLE
This is opposed to NOT being eligible for something. Also known as not being allowed.
Are you really that dishonest/dumb?
Not, "one morning." But after he goes through the process of putting in for retirement. After that he can choose to RETIRE. Quite frankly, it doesn't matter that you don't believe it. Not only do the facts directly prove you are wrong (he actually did retire).So Walz can just shirk his duties as the top kick in his unit and fail to report for duty one morning?
Dont make me laugh
You have already revealed what I need to knowYou are peeing your pants to find out what I know and when did I know it
But thats none of your business
ExactlyNot, "one morning." But after he goes through the process of putting in for retirement.
I have told you nothingYou have already revealed what I need to know
Yes, you have.I have told you nothing
Lord Mac, you are tiresome.Exactly
He needed permission to retire before his current enlistment was up
He enlisted for 6 years and enrolled the the CSM academy
Which he never compleated
Thats why he never made e-9
It is illegal to retire without permission before your enlistment expiresFirst, you claim it's somehow illegal for him to retire.
This is like having been in the Army in 1968 and never gotten farther than San Diego during Vietnam, and calling yourself a Vietnam Veteran. 100% Stolen Valor.
![]()
Picture of Walz Holding 'Enduring Freedom Veteran' Protest Sign During 2004 Anti-George Bush Rally Resurfaces Amid Accusations of Stolen Valor | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
A bombshell revelation has surfaced this week that could mark the end of Tim Walz’s political career.www.thegatewaypundit.com
"A bombshell revelation has surfaced this week that could mark the end of Tim Walz’s political career. A photo, recently unearthed, shows Walz holding a protest sign reading “Enduring Freedom Veterans for Kerry” during a 2004 anti-George Bush rally in Mankato, Minnesota.
The photograph, taken by Michael B. Brodkorb, was captured on August 4, 2004, as Walz protested outside a campaign rally for President Bush in Mankato, Minnesota.
Tim Walz has consistently portrayed himself as “a veteran of Operation Enduring Freedom,” the U.S. military operation in Afghanistan initiated after the September 11 attacks."
According to Free Beacon, it has come to light that Walz never deployed to Afghanistan, nor did he engage in any combat operations during his military career. His service was primarily in Italy, where he supported NATO forces but did not see action in the Middle East.
A video from 2009 recently resurfaced, showing Iraq War veteran David Thul confronting Walz’s aides at his Mankato office regarding these claims. Thul, armed with knowledge and evidence, filmed the encounter and pointed out that Walz’s assertions could be interpreted as violations of the Stolen Valor Act.
During this confrontation, Thul informed Walz’s aides that such misrepresentations could lead to jail time.
Thul presented evidence indicating that while Walz served in a supportive role, he did not serve in Afghanistan or engage in any combat actions. One aide admitted she was “not aware” of Walz serving in Afghanistan.
Thul went on to present the 2004 photo of Walz, holding a sign that says “Enduring Freedom Veterans for Kerry,” to another aide, who acknowledged that constituents could get the false impression that Walz served in Afghanistan."
He had a provisional rank .. which means contingent. Walz didn't complete the eligibility requirements to maintain the rank of E-9 after retirement, and was demoted to E-8 for his retirement pay grade. Yet, Walz, continued to embellish this provisional rank after retirement, including on his own bio within the kamala campaign site (which was updated).He had the FULL rank. Hence that rank being described in that release. That's why they call it a reduction in rank. They can't reduce you from a rank you never had. That would be called being maintained in rank.
You guys are simply denigrating a very senior enlisted man's service record for political gain. Counting on people not knowing how the military works.
How do you retire without permissionIt is illegal to retire without permission before your enlistment expires
Walz did not fulfill his enlistment which is why he never made CSM
You dontHow do you retire without permission![]()
So your argument is dumb.You dont
He had a provisional rank .. which means contingent. Walz didn't complete the eligibility requirements to maintain the rank of E-9 after retirement, and was demoted to E-8 for his retirement pay grade. Yet, Walz, continued to embellish this provisional rank after retirement, including on his own bio within the kamala campaign site (which was updated).
So when he says he retired as an E-9 he's not lying. Sure he's getting paid as E-8 now. But he did have the rank, the responsibilities and the pay when still active correct?to maintain the rank of E-9 after retirement
Lol, yes Mac here seems to have a terrible problem realizing that the fact that Walz did retire is kind of a pretty clear indicator that he could retire. Mac is one of those people who rather insists that he truly believes one plus one equals purple, rather than concede he's wrong about anything.So your argument is dumb.
LOL .. when he states, "He's a retired E-9 (CSM)", that's just false because he was demoted for failing eligibility requirements. Sorry .. he's embellished his career nearly 20 years after he retired, and the Kamala campaign site captured this before updating the language.So when he says he retired as an E-9 he's not lying. Sure he's getting paid as E-8 now. But he did have the rank, the responsibilities and the pay when still active correct?
Lol, you are correct. It's amazing how someone that never served will question another man's service record.Lol, yes Mac here seems to have a terrible problem realizing that the fact that Walz did retire is kind of a pretty clear indicator that he could retire. Mac is one of those people who rather insists that he truly believes one plus one equals purple, rather than concede he's wrong about anything.