- Thread starter
- #21
Well I mean, if it's for the babies, RIGHT! What could be more compelling than saving babies.
Now juxtapose that position with this one.
Kamala Harris Adds Abortion Extremism To Democratic Presidential Ticket
In the Senate, Harris is a pro-abortion extremist who supported late-term abortion, something the majority of Americans oppose.thefederalist.com
I guess Harris fails to see the irony, it appears she really doesn't care that babies are dying, she just seems to care how they die. Guns killing babies bad, abortion killing babies coming down the birth canal, good.
Your thoughts?
.
The second a woman becomes pregnant, is the embryo no longer hers in any literal sense? I mean she has to take that baby to term no matter what? Her body legally belongs to the state until the baby is born or dies on its own? Is that the free society republicans envision?
ROFLMFAO
Harris favors late term abortion of viable babies and has gone as far as supporting post birth abortions, which itself is an oxymoron. If you think she's right, you're one sick puppy.
.