Justice Department indicts former FBI Director James Comey for a second time

These MAGAt goobers think all that has to be done is to prove Comey didnt like Trump, and he will be convicted.

These are the dumbest MFers on the planet.
 
Last edited:
Actually that act alone isn't against the law. He would also need to communicate that visual to someone who had the capability of carrying it out.
Yeah, because no one else is on the Internet. 1,000% Ratty. Kudos.
 
Because there have been 3 attempts on his life already which changes everything.
Oh, how exactly?

There's also been 2 impeachments, 3 election cycles and 2 administration where the 25th amendment could have been invoked. Why are only the 2 (not 3) since Comey posted in 2025) attempts on Trump's life relevant and not the other non-violent means to 86 Trump?

How do you assign this specific meaning as "unambigious"
 
How are you going to prove Comey meant it that way? He says he didn’t.

Blanche was asked this in the press conference but his answer was gibberish.
I wouldnt prosecute him.
Oh, how exactly?

There's also been 2 impeachments, 3 election cycles amd.2 administration where the 25th amendment could have been invoked. Why are only the 2 (not 3) since Comey posted in 2025) attempts on Trump's life relevant and not the other non-violent means to 86 Trump relevant?

How do you assign this specific meaning as "unambigious"
The 25th amendment should have been uesd to remove Biden who was profoundly impaired by brain damage from a stroke and severe vascular dementia. Trumps mind is sound.

As I said I wouldnt prosecute Comey
 
Sure it does. In organized crime. And being the Director of the FBI, he would fully understand that.

Based in truth.

Completely different message - protected speech.

Or Legos or tampons. No different.

You guys know you don't have to defend every scumbag, just because they share your hatred for the President, don't you?
An image of "8647" is protected speech.

Isn't posting "Get Rid of 47" analogous with "8647'"

As a Boy Scout I'm sure Comey didn't think like a Crime Boss when he posted the image. You know who does think like a Crime Boss?
 
I wouldnt prosecute him.

The 25th amendment should have been uesd to remove Biden who was profoundly impaired by brain damage from a stroke and severe vascular dementia. Trumps mind is sound.

As I said I wouldnt prosecute Comey
Neither would I. But you were responding to me asking why 86 is unambigiously assassinate.

But this does raise another question. Going through most MAGA people's responses.Most of you guys are aware this is a completely bogus indictment.

So is it correct you think to pursue this when the chance of conviction is basically nil?
 
Last edited:
You just cant make a post without making up something out of thin air, can you?
Bidens cerebral hemorrhage is history that caused brain damage.
Biden has AFIB and a stroke history. Thats also common knowledge. AFIB and stroke cause vascular dementia. Biden also has Parkinsons disease which has its own form of dementia. HIs symptoms were profound.
After 25 years as a therapist 2 on a dementia unit and as a therapist on a geriatric unit it was easy for me to see his symptoms. He decompensated at the debate and the world saw it.
 
10 years of abject hatred toward the President. It's going to get juicy,

Speaking that law stuff. Above your paygrade.
Blanche’s response was gibberish.

It’s not hard to show Comey doesn’t like Trump, but
you still don’t get very far to prove Comey intended it as a death threat. Certainly not beyond a reasonable doubt.

Speaking of abject hatred, there’s Trump’s hatred of Comey, which will be evidence to support a dismissal for vindictive prosecution.
 
Bidens cerebral hemorrhage is history that caused brain damage.
Go ahead and show me that diagnosis and how it affected him.

See you in never, cause you have zero evidence. Just whatever some Newsmax dipshit said.

Youre just a shameless liar. You have nothing to say, if you dont lie.
 
Trump's DOJ "retribution" indictments (and threatened retribution indictments and/or retributive EO's):

James Comey
John Bolton
Letitia James
Jack Smith
Adam Schiff
Christopher Wray
Jerome Powell
John Brennan
New York Times
Wall Street Journal
Harvard University
UCLA
Covington & Burling
Perkins Coie
WilmerHale
Jenner & Block.
 
15th post
An image of "8647" is protected speech.
Depends on what the writer intended
Isn't posting "Get Rid of 47" analogous with "8647'"
Nope
As a Boy Scout I'm sure Comey didn't think like a Crime Boss when he posted the image. You know who does think like a Crime Boss?
He's not a boy scout, he was a US attorney in NY prosecuting the mafia and the head of the FBI investigating organized crime. In that context, he unquestionably knows that 86 means to kill someone.
 
How much?

Location?

Can I pay you in a backdated thirty party foreign bank check?

Are you saying COMEY LIED?! 😳
A particularly lame lie. We'll see if his wife is willing to perjure herself for him or will refuse to testify.
 

Justice Department indicts former FBI Director James Comey for a second time​



This is great news for America. Lawfare Democrats must pay a price for their coup.

Lawfare was invented by Donald Trump and he has used it throughout his business career to keep from paying his creditors. Ever decision that goes against him is appealled until he runs out of appeals, no matter how ridiculous his case is.

It brought it with him to the White House, and used it to block his staffers from testifying before Congress and refused to submit to Congressional Oversight. Trump used it to fight the various law suits brought against him in his first term, and throughout the period when he was fighting indictments after his Presidency.

Now he's using it to go after his "enemies" which is anyone who criticizes him, or ever tried to hold him to accounts. As always, Trump accuses others of doing the things he's actually doing.

So much for the First Amendment.
 
Blanche’s response was gibberish.

It’s not hard to show Comey doesn’t like Trump, but
you still don’t get very far to prove Comey intended it as a death threat. Certainly not beyond a reasonable doubt.
More reasonable than the gibberish on which your cult convicted Trump
Speaking of abject hatred, there’s Trump’s hatred of Comey, which will be evidence to support a dismissal for vindictive prosecution.
GOod luck with that. Let me guess, he's going to get millions.
 
Back
Top Bottom