No. Heās under investigation because of the choices he made. To take home hundreds of classified documents and refuse to return them.
Wrong. Heās under āinvestigationā because of choices Garland and Wray and Brandon made. Do try to keep up.
Like Obama retaining 30 MILLION PAGES of such records, you mean?
He wasnāt pretending. He may have been mistaken. But thatās a separate issue. Try to stay ON Topic. The topic is his continuing physical possession of some documents,
So many falsehoods and many things which are claimed but not proven.Wrong. Heās under āinvestigationā because of choices Garland and Wray and Brandon made. Do try to keep up.
He declassified them. So he Tom home nothing classified. And the GSA packed them up. He was allowed to be in physical possession of them. In fact, you dolt, his lawyers were in long negotiations with the governments lawyers regarding the manner and timing of return of many of the documents for the National Archives.
Repeating your error doesnāt suddenly and magically make it right. Youāre still wrong.
Like Obama retaining 30 MILLION PAGES of such records, you mean?
He wasnāt pretending. He may have been mistaken. But thatās a separate issue. Try to stay ON Topic. The topic is his continuing physical possession of some documents,
Nobody -including you- knows that any of the documents were classified, let alone hundreds....That information hasn't been released.
How do you propose we figure out what was classified and what was declassified? Given no one knows.
Irrelevant to the fact that you don't know, yet insist on claiming that you do.
No. He didnāt. They were however in his physical possession. If you have a point there, you failed to make it.
Sure he is.
The National Archives eventually took physical custody over the records. That much is true.
He declassified the papers marked āclassifiedā under any category. That you donāt know this or choose not to believe it also doesnāt control. I cite Kash Patel. You? You cite nobody and nothing other than the markings that were on some documents when they initially got classified.
These emotionally unhinged useful idiots have been fed a non-stop stream of nothingburgers for years on end. They're just too stupid to step back, look at the big picture, and ask the obvious questions.
You donāt declassify papers. You declassify information. Without knowing what was on those papers, meaning without knowing what information is declassified, we donāt know what damage has been done to national security and what information the government should release to us.
Itās quite relevant. Just admit you donāt know.
Nope. Itās a lie.
I'm the one who pointed out that nobody knows....That would include me, schmuck.
But we need to find out. Donāt you agree?
Doesnāt matter. He declassified the documents at issue. Whether or not you agree with his decision to do so is irrelevant.
No? How about for the immediate purpose of authorizing himself to have them in his physical possession outside of the White House. Try to think a bit before writing.
In other words, you ignorantly just happen not to agree with or care for what he says. Thatās a different matter altogether. You remain wrong.
Archive "is", archives "are".
Deflection from the fact....You don't know, yet insist on invoking the narrative that it is known.
Because? At some point ā before being declassified ā they had been classified. Otherwise, they wouldnāt have needed to have been DEclassified.
Thatās not what declassify means.
Iām trying to explain this to you, but you have a hard time grasping simple questions. I have to break through your programming because youāre given prepared answers to questions, and when the question doesnāt fit, your programming breaks.
