Just curious, but...

[jillian]

I sure am. Tell you to shut up and let me worry about it. When I appoint you Jillian's eunuch -- juniorest moderator in the universe, and she give you permission, THEN you can worry about.

Oh, and I don't piss up ropes. I go straight for the topknot.

I get a Eunich?

Do I get to do the Madeline Kahn... History of the World, Part I thing?

no - no- no- no- yes- no- no- yes....

sorry. couldn't resist.

 

[DamnYankee]

are there any sites we are not allowed to quote/site because of their political slant/dangerous ideas? aside from porn, illegal stuff, advertising? What is the policy on such things?

You can quote a site as a source of information. You cannot advertise another site. You cannot quote a site as a source of information if it is advertising another site, if the site or the information is illegal under US law, or against the rules of this board.

YOu cannot editorialize about another site you post on, on this board. If you have a problem with another site, take it to them.

You cannot drag a pissing contest you are having with a member on another site onto this board. That isn;t saying you cannot have the same debate here, It's saying you cannot extend an argument from another site to this one.

I try to be as laid back as I can as far as moderation goes; however, anything that might even remotely cause a board war will be ruthlessly squashed.

Are we being a sensitive little bitch tonight? Look dude, it's not MY fault it's Friday night and you don't have a date.

I am SERIOUSLY entertained. MountainMan the wisecracker being all serious and sensitive.

Next thing you know, sillybooboo will post something logical.

Whatever.
Seems you are realizing you posted bullshit.
You could have just admitted it up front without the new ad hominem.

No, I'm realizing you want to be a one-liner smartass when YOU think it's funny but when you get your panties in a wad, you want to cry like a little bitch that just shit her pampers.

It was all in fun and sarcastic, a response comparable to your usual posts. Like I said, I didn't realize you are such a sensitive bitch.

Oh hell, Gunny.... Aren't you going to just ruthlessly squash this? <g>

 

[Gunny]

are there any sites we are not allowed to quote/site because of their political slant/dangerous ideas? aside from porn, illegal stuff, advertising? What is the policy on such things?

You can quote a site as a source of information. You cannot advertise another site. You cannot quote a site as a source of information if it is advertising another site, if the site or the information is illegal under US law, or against the rules of this board.

YOu cannot editorialize about another site you post on, on this board. If you have a problem with another site, take it to them.

You cannot drag a pissing contest you are having with a member on another site onto this board. That isn;t saying you cannot have the same debate here, It's saying you cannot extend an argument from another site to this one.

I try to be as laid back as I can as far as moderation goes; however, anything that might even remotely cause a board war will be ruthlessly squashed.

Whatever.
Seems you are realizing you posted bullshit.
You could have just admitted it up front without the new ad hominem.

No, I'm realizing you want to be a one-liner smartass when YOU think it's funny but when you get your panties in a wad, you want to cry like a little bitch that just shit her pampers.

It was all in fun and sarcastic, a response comparable to your usual posts. Like I said, I didn't realize you are such a sensitive bitch.

Oh hell, Gunny.... Aren't you going to just ruthlessly squash this? <g>

Nah. This looks like a job for the 8 months old granddaughter.

 

[alan1]

It all depends upon which side of the ad hominem one is on I suppose.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/75785-elizabeth-edwards-breaks-silence-on-affair-4.html
Thanks for clearing that up for me.

 

[Dis]

 

[Gunny]

It all depends upon which side of the ad hominem one is on I suppose.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/75785-elizabeth-edwards-breaks-silence-on-affair-4.html
Thanks for clearing that up for me.

Is ad hominem a new word you've learned and decided to see how many times you can post it in one thread?

Let's get the facts straight since you obviously are determined to cling to this until the ship hits the seabed.

You made a smartass comment in regard to the moderation/rules if this board. I made a smartass comment in return. You have been crying ever since. Wah, wah, fucking wah.

Get over yourself, huh? As I said, it's all fun and games until it's YOUR butt that hurts. If anyone is guilty of misjudging someone, it's me. I thought there was more to you than the pettiness you've displayed in this thread.

My comment was meant as humor. Nothing more, nothing less.

 

[alan1]

It all depends upon which side of the ad hominem one is on I suppose.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/75785-elizabeth-edwards-breaks-silence-on-affair-4.html
Thanks for clearing that up for me.

Is ad hominem a new word you've learned and decided to see how many times you can post it in one thread?

Let's get the facts straight since you obviously are determined to cling to this until the ship hits the seabed.

You made a smartass comment in regard to the moderation/rules if this board. I made a smartass comment in return. You have been crying ever since. Wah, wah, fucking wah.

Get over yourself, huh? As I said, it's all fun and games until it's YOUR butt that hurts. If anyone is guilty of misjudging someone, it's me. I thought there was more to you than the pettiness you've displayed in this thread.

My comment was meant as humor. Nothing more, nothing less.

You indicated that I broke the rules, when I specifically and personally asked you about that unspoken rule. I accepted your response about it, and never once attempted to circumvent it. For you to indicate otherwise (sarcastically or not) is an assault on my character. You then followed it up by flinging personal insults at me. Perhaps you've noticed that I don't fling personal insults at others on this board. There is a reason for that, and it's not pettiness (another insult from you by the way). A cornered mouse will fight back.
Kerry on.

 

[Gunny]

It all depends upon which side of the ad hominem one is on I suppose.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/75785-elizabeth-edwards-breaks-silence-on-affair-4.html
Thanks for clearing that up for me.

Is ad hominem a new word you've learned and decided to see how many times you can post it in one thread?

Let's get the facts straight since you obviously are determined to cling to this until the ship hits the seabed.

You made a smartass comment in regard to the moderation/rules if this board. I made a smartass comment in return. You have been crying ever since. Wah, wah, fucking wah.

Get over yourself, huh? As I said, it's all fun and games until it's YOUR butt that hurts. If anyone is guilty of misjudging someone, it's me. I thought there was more to you than the pettiness you've displayed in this thread.

My comment was meant as humor. Nothing more, nothing less.

You indicated that I broke the rules, when I specifically and personally asked you about that unspoken rule. I accepted your response about it, and never once attempted to circumvent it. For you to indicate otherwise (sarcastically or not) is an assault on my character. You then followed it up by flinging personal insults at me. Perhaps you've noticed that I don't fling personal insults at others on this board. There is a reason for that, and it's not pettiness (another insult from you by the way). A cornered mouse will fight back.
Kerry on.

Whatever, dude. You're reading WAY too far into shit.

Since you are determined to be serious, let me clear this up for you ... IF I thought you were a problem as far as breaking the rules goes, I wouldn't be joking about it, nor would I be trying to incite you for no reason.

Do ask around, if I was honestly trying to insult you, you'd damned well know it REAL quick. I don't mince many words.

And yeah, this IS petty.

 

[alan1]

Is ad hominem a new word you've learned and decided to see how many times you can post it in one thread?

Let's get the facts straight since you obviously are determined to cling to this until the ship hits the seabed.

You made a smartass comment in regard to the moderation/rules if this board. I made a smartass comment in return. You have been crying ever since. Wah, wah, fucking wah.

Get over yourself, huh? As I said, it's all fun and games until it's YOUR butt that hurts. If anyone is guilty of misjudging someone, it's me. I thought there was more to you than the pettiness you've displayed in this thread.

My comment was meant as humor. Nothing more, nothing less.

You indicated that I broke the rules, when I specifically and personally asked you about that unspoken rule. I accepted your response about it, and never once attempted to circumvent it. For you to indicate otherwise (sarcastically or not) is an assault on my character. You then followed it up by flinging personal insults at me. Perhaps you've noticed that I don't fling personal insults at others on this board. There is a reason for that, and it's not pettiness (another insult from you by the way). A cornered mouse will fight back.
Kerry on.

Whatever, dude. You're reading WAY too far into shit.

Since you are determined to be serious, let me clear this up for you ... IF I thought you were a problem as far as breaking the rules goes, I wouldn't be joking about it, nor would I be trying to incite you for no reason.

Do ask around, if I was honestly trying to insult you, you'd damned well know it REAL quick. I don't mince many words.

And yeah, this IS petty.

The insinuations may be petty you.
When my character is in question, it isn't petty to me.

If I was breaking rules, I would expect to be given a boot in the groin,
but that's not quite what happened here.

 

[Gunny]

You indicated that I broke the rules, when I specifically and personally asked you about that unspoken rule. I accepted your response about it, and never once attempted to circumvent it. For you to indicate otherwise (sarcastically or not) is an assault on my character. You then followed it up by flinging personal insults at me. Perhaps you've noticed that I don't fling personal insults at others on this board. There is a reason for that, and it's not pettiness (another insult from you by the way). A cornered mouse will fight back.
Kerry on.

Whatever, dude. You're reading WAY too far into shit.

Since you are determined to be serious, let me clear this up for you ... IF I thought you were a problem as far as breaking the rules goes, I wouldn't be joking about it, nor would I be trying to incite you for no reason.

Do ask around, if I was honestly trying to insult you, you'd damned well know it REAL quick. I don't mince many words.

And yeah, this IS petty.

The insinuations may be petty you.
When my character is in question, it isn't petty to me.

If I was breaking rules, I would expect to be given a boot in the groin,
but that's not quite what happened here.

You're right. What happened here is you made a comment that BEGGED a response. You got one.

 

[alan1]

Whatever, dude. You're reading WAY too far into shit.

Since you are determined to be serious, let me clear this up for you ... IF I thought you were a problem as far as breaking the rules goes, I wouldn't be joking about it, nor would I be trying to incite you for no reason.

Do ask around, if I was honestly trying to insult you, you'd damned well know it REAL quick. I don't mince many words.

And yeah, this IS petty.

The insinuations may be petty you.
When my character is in question, it isn't petty to me.

If I was breaking rules, I would expect to be given a boot in the groin,
but that's not quite what happened here.

You're right. What happened here is you made a comment that BEGGED a response. You got one.

Then you should be thanking me for stimulating conversation. After all, this is a message board. Without comments, it would be a pretty boring place, doncha' think?

 

[Gunny]

The insinuations may be petty you.
When my character is in question, it isn't petty to me.

If I was breaking rules, I would expect to be given a boot in the groin,
but that's not quite what happened here.

You're right. What happened here is you made a comment that BEGGED a response. You got one.

Then you should be thanking me for stimulating conversation. After all, this is a message board. Without comments, it would be a pretty boring place, doncha' think?

Thank you for stimulating ...