Just a Reminder: The ONLY judge who received death threats so alarming that it resulted in arrest and imprisonment is Judge Eileen Cannon

[Clipper]

I wondered what your dumb ass thought.


No, not really.

The "judge" & I use that term loosely has had this case for months & has been sandgagging the proceedings from the get go, you ******* moron.

 

[Marener]

By a dude who hates women. Sounds like you leftist scum who want men kicking women asses in sports.

He doesn’t hate women. He hates feminists.

Like a lot of conservatives.

 

[Vastator]

He doesn’t hate women. He hates feminists.

Like a lot of conservatives.

Feminist is the female equivalent of "Incel". Fact...

 

[Nostra]

Nope. The SCOTUS a few years ago issued a ruling that pro life activists could protest in front of the homes of pro abortion people as a First Ammendent right. Sooooo, those protestors in front of Brett's home are just doing the same thing. Exercising their non violent 1st ammendment rights, BIGLY.

Tough shit for Brett, he ain't "special".

Sorry Sport, there is no statute forbidding protestors in front of baby killer mills.

However, there is a statute forbidding doing it in front of the Himes of SC Justices.

You lose again, Simp.

The federal law O’Reilly claims these protestors have violated is Title 18, Section 1507 of the U.S. Code, which was enacted in 1950. Under this law, it is illegal to picket or parade in front of a courthouse or a judge’s home "with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge."

Fact-check: Is it legal to protest outside justices’ homes? The law suggests no

Law suggests it's not legal to protest outside Justices' houses.

www.statesman.com

 

[Nostra]

Prove me wrong.

Just did.

 

[Clipper]

Just did.

What law did the protestors break, Beavis?

 

[Nostra]

He doesn’t hate women. He hates feminists.

Like a lot of conservatives.

So feminists are not women?

You Dimtards are so confused in this science stuff.

 

[Nostra]

What law did the protestors break, Beavis?

Look at the post above, Moron.

 

[Marener]

So feminists are not women?

You Dimtards are so confused in this science stuff.

You’re confused again.

 

[Clipper]

Look at the post above, Moron.

I did, you read it again. Apparently protestors didn't meet the guidelines spelled out in the statute or they would have been arrested, assbreath.

 

[Billiejeens]

So you oppose the first amendment then.

I didn't write the laws.
I understand them.

What else ya got?

 

[Marener]

I didn't write the laws.
I understand them.

What else ya got?

Constitution > laws

 

[struth]

He wants to know if you'll be at the trial to offer him moral support with reach arounds when the going gets rough.

Ah so you can’t actually tell us

 

[struth]

I did, you read it again. Apparently protestors didn't meet the guidelines spelled out in the statute or they would have been arrested, assbreath.

Nah we just have a demafasict admin protecting their brownshirts who are undermining our judicial branch because they stand in the way of their demafacist agenda

 

[jknowgood]

Nope. The SCOTUS a few years ago issued a ruling that pro life activists could protest in front of the homes of pro abortion people as a First Ammendent right. Sooooo, those protestors in front of Brett's home are just doing the same thing. Exercising their non violent 1st ammendment rights, BIGLY.

Tough shit for Brett, he ain't "special".

Yet one was there to kill him.

 

[Nostra]

I did, you read it again. Apparently protestors didn't meet the guidelines spelled out in the statute or they would have been arrested, assbreath.

Merritless Gestapoland chose to let them continue their crimes unabated, Simp.

 

[struth]

U.S. chief justice slams Schumer for 'dangerous' comment on justices​

https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN20R2MU/

Schumer earlier on Wednesday assailed Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, saying they "won't know what hit" them if they rule in favour of abortion restrictions.

 

[MagicMike]

It's such a shame Democrats and the media invoke violence against this ethical woman. She's been nothing but fair and balanced since the beginning.

This is fake news. Every judge, prosecutor, and kniwn witness against Trump involved in every one of hus cases has been harrassed even to the point of receiving death threats.
And IF Cannin is allowed to remain on this case we'll see if your opinion of her remains so high once she has to issue any ruling that Trump doesn't like.
As soon as he turns on her of course, you will too.
Funny how that works isn't it?
It's almost like Trump tells you what to say!

 

[Clipper]

Merritless Gestapoland chose to let them continue their crimes unabated, Simp.

They broke no law, Skippy.

Keep whining, it's very touching.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

And IF Cannin is allowed to remain on this case

Why would she not be?