Shouldn't mods be unbiased? If they are "in charge" of this board being "where your voices count", shouldn't those who moderate be exempt from expressing their voices except in moderation decisions?
Asking for a friend.
tell your friend shes a fascist,,,Shouldn't mods be unbiased? If they are "in charge" of this board being "where your voices count", shouldn't those who moderate be exempt from expressing their voices except in moderation decisions?
Asking for a friend.
This is why I would make a poor mod. Although I can be very fair in all cases, everyone would hate me. Wait, am I a mod?Shouldn't mods be unbiased? If they are "in charge" of this board being "where your voices count", shouldn't those who moderate be exempt from expressing their voices except in moderation decisions?
Asking for a friend.
Sort of like how the Ukranian workers at Burisma felt--seeing Hunter Biden making $50 K a month for doing nothing, what amounts to more than a year's salary for them.It's kinda like the rules in businesses that employees cannot date other employers or the boss cannot date an employee. It can create a conflict of interest. Or so the friend I am asking for claims.
Everyone hates you anyway, miketx. You might as well be a mod.This is why I would make a poor mod. Although I can be very fair in all cases, everyone would hate me. Wait, am I a mod?Shouldn't mods be unbiased? If they are "in charge" of this board being "where your voices count", shouldn't those who moderate be exempt from expressing their voices except in moderation decisions?
Asking for a friend.
This is why I would make a poor mod. Although I can be very fair in all cases, everyone would hate me. Wait, am I a mod?Shouldn't mods be unbiased? If they are "in charge" of this board being "where your voices count", shouldn't those who moderate be exempt from expressing their voices except in moderation decisions?
Asking for a friend.
The mods do already.Although I can be very fair in all cases, everyone would hate me.
Have you noticed all the recent threads about real election fraud that have been moved to the conspiracy theory board ?As long as they do not use their mod superpowers to screw with regular users following the rules it does not matter at all. Been on boards where the mods banned people as the last word in an argument. Those boards no longer exist.
All but a few have earned it well, especially you. Ya baised skank.This is why I would make a poor mod. Although I can be very fair in all cases, everyone would hate me. Wait, am I a mod?Shouldn't mods be unbiased? If they are "in charge" of this board being "where your voices count", shouldn't those who moderate be exempt from expressing their voices except in moderation decisions?
Asking for a friend.The mods do already.Although I can be very fair in all cases, everyone would hate me.
Jgalt has a pink gun!Everyone hates you anyway, miketx. You might as well be a mod.This is why I would make a poor mod. Although I can be very fair in all cases, everyone would hate me. Wait, am I a mod?Shouldn't mods be unbiased? If they are "in charge" of this board being "where your voices count", shouldn't those who moderate be exempt from expressing their voices except in moderation decisions?
Asking for a friend.
Zinnnngggg...
HmmShouldn't mods be unbiased? If they are "in charge" of this board being "where your voices count", shouldn't those who moderate be exempt from expressing their voices except in moderation decisions?
Asking for a friend.
Worthy though Gracie.
so you want to censor them,,,HmmShouldn't mods be unbiased? If they are "in charge" of this board being "where your voices count", shouldn't those who moderate be exempt from expressing their voices except in moderation decisions?
Asking for a friend.
How 'bout this: Mods could have sock names, used only for participating in threads, while moderating under a mod name.
That way ---- no would know who the mods are.
Great idea.HmmShouldn't mods be unbiased? If they are "in charge" of this board being "where your voices count", shouldn't those who moderate be exempt from expressing their voices except in moderation decisions?
Asking for a friend.
How 'bout this: Mods could have sock names, used only for participating in threads, while moderating under a mod name.
That way ---- no would know who the mods are.
That's where they belong. Nothing will come of it, nothing will be proved and it will never enter your mind that you have swallowed a whopper of a lie again.Have you noticed all the recent threads about real election fraud that have been moved to the conspiracy theory board ?As long as they do not use their mod superpowers to screw with regular users following the rules it does not matter at all. Been on boards where the mods banned people as the last word in an argument. Those boards no longer exist.
"Censor" who?so you want to censor them,,,HmmShouldn't mods be unbiased? If they are "in charge" of this board being "where your voices count", shouldn't those who moderate be exempt from expressing their voices except in moderation decisions?
Asking for a friend.
How 'bout this: Mods could have sock names, used only for participating in threads, while moderating under a mod name.
That way ---- no would know who the mods are.
Now that's what I call a win-win.Great idea.HmmShouldn't mods be unbiased? If they are "in charge" of this board being "where your voices count", shouldn't those who moderate be exempt from expressing their voices except in moderation decisions?
Asking for a friend.
How 'bout this: Mods could have sock names, used only for participating in threads, while moderating under a mod name.
That way ---- no would know who the mods are.
we'd have mods banning each other.
