MarcATL
Diamond Member
- Aug 12, 2009
- 44,122
- 23,300
- 2,605
I'll answer your original question, no Juicy's story is not credible.The story was ridiculous, the jury found him guilty, the two guys he hired testified against him. He offered ZERO credible defense.
The principle of not fucking faking hate crimes in a charged atmosphere, you fucking moron.
However, the point is, does this punishment fit the "crime?"
And if so, what's the principle behind it?