sakinago
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 5,320
- 1,632
- 280
The defendant has withdrawn his plea, with possibly the strongest grounds to do so in history with the prosecution dropping the case...and the uncovered clear abuses of power by the FBI...as well as the fact there was no prosecutable crime, which he is legally allowed to do.No the judiciary CANNOT order the commencement of what it cannot initiate. Maybe in mainland Europe with magistrates, but under common law, as adopted by the US constitution, the “court” cannot just ignore the executive in this matter. It has no jurisdiction. Judges in these settings cannot order the prosecution, or order the commencement of prosecution for anyone. It is the executive branches job in this case to initiate the prosecution, as well as initiate the commencement of prosecution. They are constitutionally co-equal branches with their own rules. Sullivan is over stepping his constitutional authority, just like if Sullivan were to summon congressional members to explain why a certain law was passed. He just does not have the authority to do so. The authority of the executive to decide not to prosecute is a check purposely built into the system.No she’s not. Lady is a bonafide shark with a record to back it up. That’s an awful argument. You’re picking sides and Sullivan is your hero. And it’s coming off the heels of an appellate court basically telling Sullivan he has 10 days to get his shit together. Are you really trying to argue Sullivan’s actions aren’t wildly abnormal? The prosecution said they were dropping charges...the judges role by law is over. The only thing he can legally do at this point is slam his gavel.Flynn’s new attorney actually worked for him instead of against him. Finding the withholding of evidence and now all the other garbage that has come out. Flynn WAS set up. He did not lie. Since you can not produce the ORiGINAL 302, neither you nor the liars in the FBI can say Flynn lied.His new attorney is a hack who pleases the right wing rabble. She wasn’t interested in defending him legally (her motions were legally dubious and smacked down repeatedly by the judge, even calling them unprofessional). She was putting on a public show to gin up right wing outrage and pressure.From what I've read.....Flynn's original attorneys were corrupt and worked with prosecutors from the corrupt DOJ.what does it say about Flynn's attorneys if they had him plead guilty, and affirm that guilty plea, when according to Barr there was never anything to go on? the firm representing Flynn wasn't a bottom of the barrel kind of operation.Yep.....the Obama DOJ withheld exculpatory evidence (were playing games) and framed Michael Flynn. The Judge took a bribe from somebody in Obama's criminal organization (playing games) to string out the case till Trump is forced to pardon him. If Trump Wins reelection the Democrats (playing games) will try to impeach him for the pardon.Apparently some people don’t know their constitution very well. The courts have inherent power. They may exercise it with people who are playing games."A Federal Judge can NOT 'charge' anyone with a crime"Sullivan may vacate the 18 USC 1001 charge, and then charge Flynn with perjury.
You can't lie under oath to a federal judge.
1. A Federal Judge can NOT 'charge' anyone with a crime.
According to legal precedence Sullivan has no option but to dropt the case; however, he is bringing in his Trump-hating pal to discuss the ability to 'find' Flynn in COMTEMP of court.
2. Democrats lie under oath all the time. If all of their Democrats who lied under oath were in jail today, Gitmo would be full.
The last President to lie under oath and be found in Contempt was Slick Willy. He was given no jail time, but he did his license to practice law temporarily stripped.
Are you ever not a retard?
CLINTON IS FOUND TO BE IN CONTEMPT ON JONES LAWSUIT (Published 1999)
Federal Judge Susan Webber Wright cites Pres Clinton for contempt, ruling he willfully provided false testimony under oath about his relationship with Monica S Lewinsky in January 1998 deposition in sexual misconduct lawsuit filed by Paula Corbin Jones; scathing 32-page decision says Clinton's...www.nytimes.com
He fired them and his new attorney found that the DOJ set him up.
Flynn wasn’t set up no matter what way you look at it. No one made him lie.
The original 302 has been presented and shows he lied. So do the notes from the interview. He lied. Get over it.
Flynn’s lawyer didn’t uncover anything. Her repeated motions for material were a joke and the judge dismissed all of her claims because she’s a shitty lawyer.
Maybe back in the day she was more competent but like so many, Trump has changed people into something a little more fringe. Sullivan’s rulings on her motions rip her professionalism.
She’s all over the map.
Sidney Powell Argues that Judge Sullivan Can't Appoint an Amicus at Same Time as Applauding the Time He Did Far More - emptywheel
Yesterday, Sidney Powell was publicly applauding Judge Sullivan's authority to appoint outsiders to review a prosecution gone haywire even as she was submitting a filing telling him he couldn't. She deleted that post -- but she can't delete the prior claims she made in Sullivan's docket.www.emptywheel.net
The judiciary doesn’t just have to roll over and obey the executive. I’d agree that Sullivan’s actions are wildly abnormal, but they’re only a reflection of the wildly abnormal situation the DoJ has put him in by dropping charges after a guilty plea with no claim of prosecutorial misconduct or exculpatory evidence.
The defendant has already plead guilty and is awaiting sentencing. There is no prosecution left for him to order. why would the rules of the courts require the judge to grant a motion?
this was an alleged drug dealer . And the FBI/Cops abused the power of their warrant, found there was ZERO drug dealing, and decided to still manufacture a bogus charge and were only able to do so by threatening to go after his family....it’d be the most popular Netflix documentary today.