Judge: Paper money is "unfair" to the blind

Little-Acorn

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2006
Messages
10,025
Reaction score
2,404
Points
290
Location
San Diego, CA
I guess it was inevitable.

Once the Fed govt decided it had to take cae of people with disabilities, and throw the weight of government behind efforts to protect them from their own problems, it was just a matter of time before the courts started rebuilding all of society to conform to their needs. No matter the cost, no matter the needs of the rest of society, no matter the Constitutional prohibitions against the Fed getting involved at all.

Looks like one more step in that neverending process, is being taken.

-----------------------------------------------

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/11/28/D8LMC4600.html

Judge: Make Bills Recognizable to Blind
Nov 28 6:10 PM US/Eastern

By MATT APUZZO
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON

The government discriminates against blind people by printing money that all looks and feels the same, a federal judge said Tuesday in a ruling that could change the face of American currency.

U.S. District Judge James Robertson ordered the Treasury Department to come up with ways for the blind to tell bills apart. He said he wouldn't tell officials how to fix the problem, but he ordered them to begin working on it.

The American Council of the Blind has proposed several options, including printing bills of differing sizes, adding embossed dots or foil to the paper or using raised ink.

"Of the more than 180 countries that issue paper currency, only the United States prints bills that are identical in size and color in all their denominations," Robertson wrote. "More than 100 of the other issuers vary their bills in size according to denomination, and every other issuer includes at least some features that help the visually impaired."

Government attorneys argued that forcing the Treasury Department to change the size of the bills or add texture would make it harder to prevent counterfeiting. Robertson was not swayed.

"The fact that each of these features is currently used in other currencies suggests that, at least on the face of things, such accommodations are reasonable," he wrote.

He said the government was violating the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in government programs. The opinion came after a four-year legal fight.

Electronic devices are available to help blind people differentiate between bills, but many complain that they are slow, expensive and unreliable. Visually impaired shoppers frequently rely on store clerks to help them.

"It's just frankly unfair that blind people should have to rely on the good faith of people they have never met in knowing whether they've been given the correct change," said Jeffrey A. Lovitky, attorney for the plaintiffs in the lawsuit.


(Full text of the article can be read at the above URL)
 

Annie

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Messages
50,848
Reaction score
4,826
Points
1,790
I heard about this, so much nonsense. I say let the blind mark their bills, much like the drug dealers do. I'm serious.

I put my bills in order, not so hard.
 

dilloduck

Diamond Member
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
53,240
Reaction score
5,795
Points
1,850
Location
Austin, TX
I guess it was inevitable.

Once the Fed govt decided it had to take cae of people with disabilities, and throw the weight of government behind efforts to protect them from their own problems, it was just a matter of time before the courts started rebuilding all of society to conform to their needs. No matter the cost, no matter the needs of the rest of society, no matter the Constitutional prohibitions against the Fed getting involved at all.

Looks like one more step in that neverending process, is being taken.

-----------------------------------------------

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/11/28/D8LMC4600.html

Judge: Make Bills Recognizable to Blind
Nov 28 6:10 PM US/Eastern

By MATT APUZZO
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON

The government discriminates against blind people by printing money that all looks and feels the same, a federal judge said Tuesday in a ruling that could change the face of American currency.

U.S. District Judge James Robertson ordered the Treasury Department to come up with ways for the blind to tell bills apart. He said he wouldn't tell officials how to fix the problem, but he ordered them to begin working on it.

The American Council of the Blind has proposed several options, including printing bills of differing sizes, adding embossed dots or foil to the paper or using raised ink.

"Of the more than 180 countries that issue paper currency, only the United States prints bills that are identical in size and color in all their denominations," Robertson wrote. "More than 100 of the other issuers vary their bills in size according to denomination, and every other issuer includes at least some features that help the visually impaired."

Government attorneys argued that forcing the Treasury Department to change the size of the bills or add texture would make it harder to prevent counterfeiting. Robertson was not swayed.

"The fact that each of these features is currently used in other currencies suggests that, at least on the face of things, such accommodations are reasonable," he wrote.

He said the government was violating the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in government programs. The opinion came after a four-year legal fight.

Electronic devices are available to help blind people differentiate between bills, but many complain that they are slow, expensive and unreliable. Visually impaired shoppers frequently rely on store clerks to help them.

"It's just frankly unfair that blind people should have to rely on the good faith of people they have never met in knowing whether they've been given the correct change," said Jeffrey A. Lovitky, attorney for the plaintiffs in the lawsuit.


(Full text of the article can be read at the above URL)
I bet Mr. Lovitky makes damn sure he gets the accurate amount of money for "helping" blind people.:thumbdown:
 

BaronVonBigmeat

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
1,185
Reaction score
163
Points
48
Eh, I don't think it's such a bad idea. It wouldn't be that hard to make our bills in six different lengths. In fact it might save a slight amount of money if the $1 and $5 notes were smaller. If the government got out of the business of creating and controlling money, we'd probably already have private companies (Visa, Mastercard) issuing more user-friendly notes than what we have now. Plus, they'd almost certainly be backed by something of value.
 

MissileMan

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
2,939
Reaction score
223
Points
48
Eh, I don't think it's such a bad idea. It wouldn't be that hard to make our bills in six different lengths. In fact it might save a slight amount of money if the $1 and $5 notes were smaller. If the government got out of the business of creating and controlling money, we'd probably already have private companies (Visa, Mastercard) issuing more user-friendly notes than what we have now. Plus, they'd almost certainly be backed by something of value.
Any idea what kind of headaches bills of different lengths would cause businesses that are highly dependent on bill validation?
 

Hobbit

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2004
Messages
5,099
Reaction score
421
Points
48
Location
Near Atlanta, GA
Eh, I don't think it's such a bad idea. It wouldn't be that hard to make our bills in six different lengths. In fact it might save a slight amount of money if the $1 and $5 notes were smaller. If the government got out of the business of creating and controlling money, we'd probably already have private companies (Visa, Mastercard) issuing more user-friendly notes than what we have now. Plus, they'd almost certainly be backed by something of value.
It would require an ammendment. The Constitution grants sole minting powers to the federal government.

Not to mention that it's a bad idea. Money serves as a universal medium for trade. If private companies made money, competing companies would all be competing to make sure their currency was stronger. The price would fluctuate so much, it would make your head spin. It works internationally because each country only accepts one, maybe two forms of currency standard (with a possible third, thanks to the Euro). With private companies making currency, there'd be a good 4+ currencies in this country, with exchanges getting out of control.
 

red states rule

Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
16,011
Reaction score
573
Points
48
U.S. District Judge James Robertson is another Clinton appointed Judge.

Another liberal wacko imposing liberalism from the bench
 

KarlMarx

Senior Member
Joined
May 9, 2004
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
492
Points
48
Location
...
Electronic money --- coming soon to a society near you...

Paper money, and hard currency are destined for the dustbin of history.

It is just a matter of time before we will be using something like a credit card for every purchase.

Electronic money is more secure than paper money, it can't be counterfeited and is difficult to steal.

The flow of cash will be increased with the use of electronic money, since transactions will go directly from the buyer's bank account to the seller's.

Of course, every financial transaction, even vending machine purchases, will be traceable. And of course, that has a sinister side.

But, I believe that it is inevitable.
 

90K

Rookie
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
1,204
Reaction score
65
Points
0
Location
in the back of GW in foggy bottom
Isn't this subject a little too old to be making a fuss over? I mean like say a hundred years too late to answer? I lived in Japan and they had these dots on the edges of the Yen bills to identify the denomination of course they have 3 bills anyway 1,000-5,000 and 10,000 yen notes pretty simple.
 

Nienna

VIP Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2005
Messages
4,515
Reaction score
334
Points
83
Location
Ohio
Eh, I don't think it's such a bad idea. It wouldn't be that hard to make our bills in six different lengths. In fact it might save a slight amount of money if the $1 and $5 notes were smaller. If the government got out of the business of creating and controlling money, we'd probably already have private companies (Visa, Mastercard) issuing more user-friendly notes than what we have now. Plus, they'd almost certainly be backed by something of value.
And have to go through the expense of replacing all ATMs and automatic cashiers. Why don't the blind people just use debit cards? I mean, seriously, where are debit cards NOT used these days? I hardly ever have cash, myself.

**Edit: Karl, you beat me to it! :)**
 

red states rule

Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
16,011
Reaction score
573
Points
48
And have to go through the expense of replacing all ATMs and automatic cashiers. Why don't the blind people just use debit cards? I mean, seriously, where are debit cards NOT used these days? I hardly ever have cash, myself.

If they did that, they would not be able to file a silly lawsuite and not get all the attention they are getting now

Plus their lawyers would not reap a huge payoff as well
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top