Judge "orders" Trump Administration to stop arresting people in California

The supreme court already ruled except for regulated activities, or suspicion of a crime, they can't demand identification.
Ah, illegal immigration is a crime. And if there is suspicion, there is a need to demand identification.
 
The supreme court already ruled except for regulated activities, or suspicion of a crime, they can't demand identification.

The real world says otherwise and if you're a fan of SCOTUS tell people to pay for their student loans
 
The people is legally defined as everyone physically present in the US and its territories.

We corrected that wrongful view by amending the constitution and it's laws to specifically make the universal application clear.
NEGATIVE….Get ready to piss your pants and scream at the sky.
“people”, “citizens” and “persons” are all synonymous when used in the context of the U.S. Constitution.
The Preamble is titled We The People Of The United States and not We The People Of The World. The U.S. Constitution is not an international document that extends to foreign nationals who break into our nation against the will of the people. The framers intent was crystal clear…they HATED dark people, they never wanted or expected ANY to EVER have a say in the workings of America, this is evidenced by the Naturalization Act.
IMG_0450.webp
 
They were in the presence of other illegals at the time of their detention.

I am actively studying the case right now. What, you thought I left the thread?
Then answer this. If a US Citizen is hanging out with his illegal alien compadres. Can they demand identification from the US Citizen?
 
They can make rulings in individual cases and those rulings would certainly apply in their jurisdiction. Every action taken by the Executive isn't legal just because they are legally allowed to make policy within that realm of governance. The President is the Commander in Chief but he can't order the US Army to house soldiers in citizens homes. He cant order the invasion of Canada or some other country. (Except Iran or Syria, or Iraq, or Yemen, or Libya.....) but that's a separate topic.
So you’re saying that every Democrat town or city can decide to obstruct the people’s wish, as indicated by the election of a president who campaigned on correcting Biden’s failure at the Southern Border, to deport illegal aliens?
 

Link above.
When are these out of control "judges" going to realize that the federal government (as we REPEATEDLY were told during the 4 years of the Biden regime) - has control of immigration policy.

This "order" will be ignored, appealed to Supreme Court, and overturned.

Try again, lefty.
Didn't the scouts just rule on federal judges overreach?
 

Link above.
When are these out of control "judges" going to realize that the federal government (as we REPEATEDLY were told during the 4 years of the Biden regime) - has control of immigration policy.

This "order" will be ignored, appealed to Supreme Court, and overturned.

Try again, lefty.
Not even sure the loon 9th circuit will support this nonsense.
 
Then answer this. If a US Citizen is hanging out with his illegal alien compadres. Can they demand identification from the US Citizen?
Easy, yes. Being in the midst of those suspected of a crime, or verified to have committed a crime, makes you susceptible to suspicion yourself, especially if you are seen associating with them at the time of the law enforcement action.
 
15th post
The supreme court already ruled except for regulated activities, or suspicion of a crime, they can't demand identification.
Why would an individual being here legally and committing no crime NOT show I.D. to law enforcement?
 
You said I.C.E. has a list.
I'm questioning who is on that list, and how were all those people we don't know are in the country, put on such a list?
As my military father often tells me...

That is for them to know, and you to find out.
 
Back
Top Bottom