Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Right wings loons aren't that good at looking past the headlines. Many a time they've posted a link without reading the body that actually contradicts their point. Deplorable are not the brightest of species. I mean, shit, they voted for the Orange Buffoon for chrissakes.. The alleged whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications that partly prompted the complaint to the inspector general, an official briefed on the matter told CNN on Thursday.Really? Care to post that link?Because fucking CNN reported it, dumb shit.How would you know?Another day, another attempted diversion from the fact that the "whistlblower" has absolutely no first-hand info on the matter.
And another tree-fiddy to the OP from Daily Kooks, for spreading their agitprop Spam.
Intel Inspector General suggested whistleblower had concerns about multiple actions - CNNPolitics
From YOUR link
The whistleblower's attorney, Andrew Bakaj, had no comment when asked about the claim that the individual did not have direct knowledge of the communication in question. When asked if the complaint deals with Ukraine, Bakaj again had no comment.
A source close to the whistleblower's legal team pushed back strongly against the assertion that the intelligence Community's Inspector General would accept "third-hand disclosures" and that what the official "outlined about lack of personal knowledge and not within their course of work seems like the beginning of a smear by those trying to discredit the whistleblower."
Froggie is a liar (and a sloppy one at that). What a surprise
The only problem here is it is DailyKos. That is kinda like using pjmedia.Donald Trump withheld aid to a United States ally in order to force that ally into providing him with ammunition he could use against a potential opponent in the 2020 election. That’s the story. Full stop. There are no circumstances in which what Trump has done are in any sense acceptable. The only option is for Congress to immediately begin impeachment. Not an inquiry into whether there should be an inquiry. Impeachment.
Journalists behaving badly—the rush to frame the whistleblower story to help Trump
If Republicans are going to continue aiding him on this one.
I read the whole story, asshole....The "whistleblower" still has no first-hand information of what he's talking about.Right wings loons aren't that good at looking past the headlines. Many a time they've posted a link without reading the body that actually contradicts their point. Deplorable are not the brightest of species. I mean, shit, they voted for the Orange Buffoon for chrissakes.. The alleged whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications that partly prompted the complaint to the inspector general, an official briefed on the matter told CNN on Thursday.Really? Care to post that link?Because fucking CNN reported it, dumb shit.How would you know?
Intel Inspector General suggested whistleblower had concerns about multiple actions - CNNPolitics
From YOUR link
The whistleblower's attorney, Andrew Bakaj, had no comment when asked about the claim that the individual did not have direct knowledge of the communication in question. When asked if the complaint deals with Ukraine, Bakaj again had no comment.
A source close to the whistleblower's legal team pushed back strongly against the assertion that the intelligence Community's Inspector General would accept "third-hand disclosures" and that what the official "outlined about lack of personal knowledge and not within their course of work seems like the beginning of a smear by those trying to discredit the whistleblower."
Froggie is a liar (and a sloppy one at that). What a surprise
. The alleged whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications that partly prompted the complaint to the inspector general, an official briefed on the matter told CNN on Thursday.Really? Care to post that link?Because fucking CNN reported it, dumb shit.How would you know?Another day, another attempted diversion from the fact that the "whistlblower" has absolutely no first-hand info on the matter.
And another tree-fiddy to the OP from Daily Kooks, for spreading their agitprop Spam.
Intel Inspector General suggested whistleblower had concerns about multiple actions - CNNPolitics
To NOT impeach shows acceptance...of behavior we can NOT have repeated or (god forbid) continue
CNN reported that the whistleblower has no first-hand information....I can still read and comprehend the English language...Can you?. The alleged whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications that partly prompted the complaint to the inspector general, an official briefed on the matter told CNN on Thursday.Really? Care to post that link?Because fucking CNN reported it, dumb shit.How would you know?Another day, another attempted diversion from the fact that the "whistlblower" has absolutely no first-hand info on the matter.
And another tree-fiddy to the OP from Daily Kooks, for spreading their agitprop Spam.
Intel Inspector General suggested whistleblower had concerns about multiple actions - CNNPolitics
That doesn't say one word about CNN knowing who the whistleblower is and that they are talking to the whistleblower.
Do you know what the word "partly" means. It sure doesn't mean "absolutely no first hand info on the mater."
Stop taking one sentence and twisting it into being something it's not just because you want it to be.
Funny how I read the same story and that's not what it said.I read the whole story, asshole....The "whistleblower" still has no first-hand information of what he's talking about.Right wings loons aren't that good at looking past the headlines. Many a time they've posted a link without reading the body that actually contradicts their point. Deplorable are not the brightest of species. I mean, shit, they voted for the Orange Buffoon for chrissakes.. The alleged whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications that partly prompted the complaint to the inspector general, an official briefed on the matter told CNN on Thursday.Really? Care to post that link?Because fucking CNN reported it, dumb shit.
Intel Inspector General suggested whistleblower had concerns about multiple actions - CNNPolitics
From YOUR link
The whistleblower's attorney, Andrew Bakaj, had no comment when asked about the claim that the individual did not have direct knowledge of the communication in question. When asked if the complaint deals with Ukraine, Bakaj again had no comment.
A source close to the whistleblower's legal team pushed back strongly against the assertion that the intelligence Community's Inspector General would accept "third-hand disclosures" and that what the official "outlined about lack of personal knowledge and not within their course of work seems like the beginning of a smear by those trying to discredit the whistleblower."
Froggie is a liar (and a sloppy one at that). What a surprise
That's pretty much his whole schtick. He will seize on one sentence or phrase in an article and twist it to change the meaning of the whole thing. I'm not sure if he does it deliberately or if it's a subconscious thing.. The alleged whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications that partly prompted the complaint to the inspector general, an official briefed on the matter told CNN on Thursday.Really? Care to post that link?Because fucking CNN reported it, dumb shit.How would you know?Another day, another attempted diversion from the fact that the "whistlblower" has absolutely no first-hand info on the matter.
And another tree-fiddy to the OP from Daily Kooks, for spreading their agitprop Spam.
Intel Inspector General suggested whistleblower had concerns about multiple actions - CNNPolitics
That doesn't say one word about CNN knowing who the whistleblower is and that they are talking to the whistleblower.
Do you know what the word "partly" means. It sure doesn't mean "absolutely no first hand info on the mater."
Stop taking one sentence and twisting it into being something it's not just because you want it to be.
No, they didn't. They reported that someone told them that, they also reported that someone else told them it wasn't true.CNN reported that the whistleblower has no first-hand information....I can still read and comprehend the English language...Can you?. The alleged whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications that partly prompted the complaint to the inspector general, an official briefed on the matter told CNN on Thursday.Really? Care to post that link?Because fucking CNN reported it, dumb shit.How would you know?
Intel Inspector General suggested whistleblower had concerns about multiple actions - CNNPolitics
That doesn't say one word about CNN knowing who the whistleblower is and that they are talking to the whistleblower.
Do you know what the word "partly" means. It sure doesn't mean "absolutely no first hand info on the mater."
Stop taking one sentence and twisting it into being something it's not just because you want it to be.
You fucking idiot.President Trump has to root-out all of those deep state traitors.
The "whistle blower" is an illegal leaker.
A President's communications with other leaders is classified, unless he wants to declassify it.
it's just another contrived fake scandal by the totally corrupt and dishonest Dem politiciansYou fucking idiot.President Trump has to root-out all of those deep state traitors.
The "whistle blower" is an illegal leaker.
A President's communications with other leaders is classified, unless he wants to declassify it.
The whislteblower did everything BY THE BOOK. He did it exactly as he was supposed to and the White House ILLEGALLY inserted themselves in the process
Oh and it turns out that there probably is no "transcript"
Trump doesn't need any help to get reelected
Donald Trump withheld aid to a United States ally in order to force that ally into providing him with ammunition he could use against a potential opponent in the 2020 election. That’s the story. Full stop. There are no circumstances in which what Trump has done are in any sense acceptable. The only option is for Congress to immediately begin impeachment. Not an inquiry into whether there should be an inquiry. Impeachment.
Journalists behaving badly—the rush to frame the whistleblower story to help Trump
If Republicans are going to continue aiding him on this one.
Donald Trump withheld aid to a United States ally in order to force that ally into providing him with ammunition he could use against a potential opponent in the 2020 election. That’s the story. Full stop. There are no circumstances in which what Trump has done are in any sense acceptable. The only option is for Congress to immediately begin impeachment. Not an inquiry into whether there should be an inquiry. Impeachment.
Journalists behaving badly—the rush to frame the whistleblower story to help Trump
If Republicans are going to continue aiding him on this one.
I'm gonna stand over here and LMAO.
You are so full of shit I'm sure you can't breath.
The transcript cleared Trump and you and the other lefty loons got a big nothing burger and the rest of us got one hell of a laugh.
Biden however seems to be in trouble. He told everyone, on national television no less, exactly how he misused his office to help his son.
Good luck in 2020 cause you sure need it. LOL
Donald Trump withheld aid to a United States ally in order to force that ally into providing him with ammunition he could use against a potential opponent in the 2020 election. That’s the story.
