Jonathan Turley doesn't address the Constitutional arguments against impeachment

GOP keeps asking for more evidence, but won't allow people who have it to testify He just explains to us in suttle ways that we haven't gone far enough. Therefore, nothing is impeachable. He would have a point, but someone forgot to give him the memo about all the people that Trump ordered not to testify. If Trump had allowed all the witnesses, we wouldn't have gotten to judicial hearings already.

The Democrats don't want those people to testify and why?

It would toss their core reason to impeach Trump and that is OBSTRUCTION!

Yes, you read it the Democrats are glad Trump is obstructing them and will use it as their main reason to impeach him...

Now the question is will the Senate Convict and Remove if Obstruction is the main reason?

I still say no...
 
GOP keeps asking for more evidence, but won't allow people who have it to testify He just explains to us in suttle ways that we haven't gone far enough. Therefore, nothing is impeachable. He would have a point, but someone forgot to give him the memo about all the people that Trump ordered not to testify. If Trump had allowed all the witnesses, we wouldn't have gotten to judicial hearings already.

The Democrats don't want those people to testify and why?

It would toss their core reason to impeach Trump and that is OBSTRUCTION!

Yes, you read it the Democrats are glad Trump is obstructing them and will use it as their main reason to impeach him...

Now the question is will the Senate Convict and Remove if Obstruction is the main reason?

I still say no...
That's a lie. Trump obstructed the process by gagging these people.

During this whole time Trump has been lying, obstructing and gagging witnesses. Why? To take away my right to a free and fair election. Republicans say they don't care what Trump does. I do, because he stole, and once again, was trying to steal my right to a free and fair election. And, as Republicans support this criminal in the pursuit of cheating us out of a fair election, once again, I say to all these Republican deplorables who support criminals, "fuck you and the horse you rode in on."elosi announces full speed ahead with articles of impeachment against Trump
 
I think that there is enough evidence already on the record to support impeachment, considering that rump's supporters did not introduce any contradictory testimony, although there was ample opportunity to do so. rump blocked his own potentially exculpatory witnesses from testifying.

What's with this Gaetz? He seems to be out of his mind. If somebody's campaign donations damage that person's credibility, then many people on both sides of the aisle are in trouble. Moreover, he is an incredibly rude little boy.
Jordan, Gaetz, Nunes, Giuliani, and others are losing their minds with incoherent gobbly goo. The more you try and support Trump and his criminal agenda, the worse it is for these people. It all comes out in the wash people. It always does.
 
GOP keeps asking for more evidence, but won't allow people who have it to testify He just explains to us in suttle ways that we haven't gone far enough. Therefore, nothing is impeachable. He would have a point, but someone forgot to give him the memo about all the people that Trump ordered not to testify. If Trump had allowed all the witnesses, we wouldn't have gotten to judicial hearings already.
Power is vested in the voters of states who duly elect the president, not a handful of Reps from the lower house of Congress.
There never was a duly elected election. And this one, had the conspiracy not been uncovered, would have been another illegal election. Republicans have not presented one ounce of coherent rebuttals of evidence against what Trump did.
 
GOP keeps asking for more evidence, but won't allow people who have it to testify He just explains to us in suttle ways that we haven't gone far enough. Therefore, nothing is impeachable. He would have a point, but someone forgot to give him the memo about all the people that Trump ordered not to testify. If Trump had allowed all the witnesses, we wouldn't have gotten to judicial hearings already.
"subtle" not "suttle." easy mistake/
Thanks!
 
There never was a duly elected election. And this one, had the conspiracy not been uncovered, would have been another illegal election. .
What are you babbling about?

Pussy hat and CNN as soon as possible!

0ik1lzzhif3y.jpg
 
People are surprised that republicans and Trump himself call this impeachment scam a scam when democrats ignore the fact that they've called for his impeachment since BEFORE he was ever sworn into office.

So in the face of fairness, please show any liberal president who had members of congress calling for their impeachment before they put their hand on the bible.
 
GOP keeps asking for more evidence, but won't allow people who have it to testify He just explains to us in suttle ways that we haven't gone far enough. Therefore, nothing is impeachable. He would have a point, but someone forgot to give him the memo about all the people that Trump ordered not to testify. If Trump had allowed all the witnesses, we wouldn't have gotten to judicial hearings already.
Hillary lost the election.
Get over it.
No, because there never was a legal election. That's already been proven, and you are paralyzed at defending it as a legal election.
 
People are surprised that republicans and Trump himself call this impeachment scam a scam when democrats ignore the fact that they've called for his impeachment since BEFORE he was ever sworn into office.

So in the face of fairness, please show any liberal president who had members of congress calling for their impeachment before they put their hand on the bible.
Remember Mike Flynn and how they waited twenty something days to fire him after he lied to the FBI about his illegal contacts with Russia to set foreign policy behind the back of a sitting president while Trump tried to cover for Flynn? That alone would have gotten Obama impeached immediately.
 
I think that there is enough evidence already on the record to support impeachment, considering that rump's supporters did not introduce any contradictory testimony, although there was ample opportunity to do so. rump blocked his own potentially exculpatory witnesses from testifying.

What's with this Gaetz? He seems to be out of his mind. If somebody's campaign donations damage that person's credibility, then many people on both sides of the aisle are in trouble. Moreover, he is an incredibly rude little boy.
Jordan, Gaetz, Nunes, Giuliani, and others are losing their minds with incoherent gobbly goo. The more you try and support Trump and his criminal agenda, the worse it is for these people. It all comes out in the wash people. It always does.

I certainly hope so. I've been around DC since the Nixon era, and never saw the incredibly infantile behavior that we are seeing now, regardless of which party held what office. We can't just blame the kids for the lack of respect for the rules of decorum and procedure, since so many of them are older, such as rump. It's hideous.
 
People are surprised that republicans and Trump himself call this impeachment scam a scam when democrats ignore the fact that they've called for his impeachment since BEFORE he was ever sworn into office.

So in the face of fairness, please show any liberal president who had members of congress calling for their impeachment before they put their hand on the bible.
Remember Mike Flynn and how they waited twenty something days to fire him after he lied to the FBI about his illegal contacts with Russia to set foreign policy behind the back of a sitting president while Trump tried to cover for Flynn? That alone would have gotten Obama impeached immediately.

Son, Obama gave guns to drug cartels that were then used against American citizens and he wasn't impeached. He had black immunity.

But I ask again, please show me a liberal president who had republicans calling for their impeachment before they were sworn in.
 
The GOP won't allow people to testify when democrats are in charge? What freaking planet are you from?
We'll, then you are admitting guilt then. Democrats own the House which means they share the power. If you can't recognize the power, then you are a traitor tom your own country. That's how that works.
I have news for you, BWK. The people did not put Democrats in the House with power to destroy the Constitution and the union of states enjoyed by Americans for the last 243 years. Instead of running fairly by forming a platform based on easing the tax burden or curing cancer or encouraging supporters to go out and get votes the traditional way, the Democrats have taken to using the Press to destroy the President day after day, ad nauseum.

They are robbing taxpayers, instead, charging all taxpayers in all parties through taxes lavished on nonsense hearings that make the President look like a dog and themselves looking like bankers; they dip in federal money employing lawyers, to think up ways to damage the president; they spend taxpayer money also to hire false scenario experts like Christine Blasey Ford to write up false scenarios for people like Adam Schiff to quote entire "what ifs" about people he wants to decimate, as he is decimating President Trump and would like to have decimated Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and paid one person $800,000 for her to have "protection" when she went back home to California, to a cushy life afforded by her DNC admiration followers in the university system. The dowager recently Pelosi expropriated (using her power as House Speaker) the people's retirement accounts for her party's disposal to the tune of $2.4 billion dollars that was forced by the post-Depression era Congress to put aside 7 to 8% of their paychecks plus the same amount from their employers to provide for social security at retirement age, after a law was passed to waive the Constitution that said not to tax American citizens. The idea was to make sure the money was allowed to grow like an investment, but a few decades later, Congress began dipping into the fund to help pay for this, that, and the other. My guess is that since the "insurance policy" failed to unseat President Trump thus far, the Democrats are (in case their railroad job on President Trump false impeachment falls through) going to use the money Nancy Pelosi expropriated to fund projects that can be easily used to transfer cash to Democrat pockets if they have to get out of Dodge on account of taxpayers angry enough to kill them all for stealing their retirement purses. What's to stop her?

Why can't the people stop this 3-year-long false impeachment marathon that engenders a lot of hate against every participating elected Democrat, who now have a Golden Parachute if they leave the country to avoid getting sued by people who want their social security money back. OR, she could fund her own War against her opponents headed by her obedient lapdogs who got fired from the FBI and CIA.

O don't think Social Security should be used to damage non Democrats. Nancy sees to it only her party people get benefits, jobs, business help, and places Republicans on her careful NO HELP LIST initiated in the Clinton Administration years.

The Constitution's weakness is that it was written in a time when integrity and strong religious faith caused people to care for both neighbor and self in this country, that was broken down when the Democrats lost the Civil War, and a few generations down the line, Lyndon Johnson convinced John F. Kennedy to be nicer to Black voters because they had lost power with the white majority, and the percentages told them they would need all the black voters' population of voters to vote against their previous Republican friends who freed them from slavery, gave them the vote and ability to run in political races, and restitution by granting 40 acres and a mule to black male family providers, most of whom sold the gift to buy booze and drugs rather than to run a for-profit farm so they could save back the bounty to engage in businesses of their choice. Republican President Eisenhower instituted equal educational privileges to black children to pay his respects to the black Army recruits who saved countless lives and fought bravely to free Europe from the vise that Hitler's Nazis held over people by killing the majority of Jews in the countries occupied, stealing their assets and giving them to Aryans, and also euthanized people with handicaps, and executed homosexuals, and used the methods of false narrative and secret executions to rid themselves of people who inconvenienced the Fuhrer's interests in any way shape or form, kind of like Schiff's secrecy railroad job he's doing on President Donald Trump, since nothing compels him to gain power by his party using the power he has that used to be given only by people of the highest moral standards in the world. To do it, he's lied his ass off for the past 3 years to lead the coup of President Donald Trump by any means necessary.
You aren't arguing anything that has any relevance. If you want to change the Constitution, then amend the Constitution. None of that is worth shit today in our current system that involves this criminal case. Turley was useless in his testimony trying to prolong the process. Why? Enough evidence is in, and he forgot to mention the fact that Trump himself was holding up the process. So Turley's points were mute and worth shit.
 
People are surprised that republicans and Trump himself call this impeachment scam a scam when democrats ignore the fact that they've called for his impeachment since BEFORE he was ever sworn into office.

So in the face of fairness, please show any liberal president who had members of congress calling for their impeachment before they put their hand on the bible.
Remember Mike Flynn and how they waited twenty something days to fire him after he lied to the FBI about his illegal contacts with Russia to set foreign policy behind the back of a sitting president while Trump tried to cover for Flynn? That alone would have gotten Obama impeached immediately.

Son, Obama gave guns to drug cartels that were then used against American citizens and he wasn't impeached. He had black immunity.

But I ask again, please show me a liberal president who had republicans calling for their impeachment before they were sworn in.
I can't, and the argument is worth shit, because Trump was involved in foreign policy decisions before he was sworn in. That's illegal. Fuck Trump and Flynn. They are criminals.
 
GOP keeps asking for more evidence, but won't allow people who have it to testify He just explains to us in suttle ways that we haven't gone far enough. Therefore, nothing is impeachable. He would have a point, but someone forgot to give him the memo about all the people that Trump ordered not to testify. If Trump had allowed all the witnesses, we wouldn't have gotten to judicial hearings already.
His reply would have been swift, and utterly devastating to your spin.


All the people that Trump ordered to not testify enjoy a Constitutional privilege of being in a separate but equal branch of government and they have rights against this kind of witch hunt.

Of course, if the show was being done in the Judiciary right from the start, and the Republican's were permitted to cross-examine all witnesses (notice I don't use the term fact witness, as there have been no facts to date) then I dare say, they would have been permitted to testify with all the rights granted them by executive privilege.

But I won't say any of that as I don't want to be responsible for any aneurysm you may have.
 
I think that there is enough evidence already on the record to support impeachment, considering that rump's supporters did not introduce any contradictory testimony, although there was ample opportunity to do so. rump blocked his own potentially exculpatory witnesses from testifying.

What's with this Gaetz? He seems to be out of his mind. If somebody's campaign donations damage that person's credibility, then many people on both sides of the aisle are in trouble. Moreover, he is an incredibly rude little boy.
Jordan, Gaetz, Nunes, Giuliani, and others are losing their minds with incoherent gobbly goo. The more you try and support Trump and his criminal agenda, the worse it is for these people. It all comes out in the wash people. It always does.

I certainly hope so. I've been around DC since the Nixon era, and never saw the incredibly infantile behavior that we are seeing now, regardless of which party held what office. We can't just blame the kids for the lack of respect for the rules of decorum and procedure, since so many of them are older, such as rump. It's hideous.
It really is. As we get older as a country, so goes the respect for our founding's it seems. Personally, I'm still there with the Constitution and the rule of law. But the country has aged and our demographics have changed. And that is where, and why I see so many on the Right turning their backs of the documents we hold so dear. They fear the others. Why? Because Republicans are about "I got mine and fuck the rest." It's crude, but it's the truth. And that is why Trump is so important to them. He represents the removal and or elimination of the others in this country. Which runs antithetical to our founding's. "We the people", or the "statue of Liberty" no longer mean anything to these people, if in fact these words ever did? That is why the Right tolerates so much of Trump's crimes.
 
GOP keeps asking for more evidence, but won't allow people who have it to testify He just explains to us in suttle ways that we haven't gone far enough. Therefore, nothing is impeachable. He would have a point, but someone forgot to give him the memo about all the people that Trump ordered not to testify. If Trump had allowed all the witnesses, we wouldn't have gotten to judicial hearings already.
His reply would have been swift, and utterly devastating to your spin.


All the people that Trump ordered to not testify enjoy a Constitutional privilege of being in a separate but equal branch of government and they have rights against this kind of witch hunt.

Of course, if the show was being done in the Judiciary right from the start, and the Republican's were permitted to cross-examine all witnesses (notice I don't use the term fact witness, as there have been no facts to date) then I dare say, they would have been permitted to testify with all the rights granted them by executive privilege.

But I won't say any of that as I don't want to be responsible for any aneurysm you may have.
There wouldn't have been any witnesses you idiot. They were gagged.

But the evidence is in, and you have failed to prove it was a "witch hunt." Lol! You lose.
 
No matter HOW HARD the radical little brain dead leftists, here on this board and on their propaganda wing, try to SPIN this impeachment FARCE, the FACT of the matter remains, it is HIGHLY unpopular, and it is BACK FIRING on them in EPIC style. They are cutting their own throats, with GLEE.

They are also setting a VERY dangerous precedent for if and when the winds blow in the other direction. If another democrat ever wins the white house, then will the republicans IMMEDIATELY start with IMPEACHMENT? Well, WHY NOT? That's EXACTLY what the DEMOCRATS DID.

Democrats are CORRUPT, democrats are the party of TRASH.
 

Forum List

Back
Top