The Republican case against Biden takes a body blow … from Fox News

[Clipper]

View attachment 834158
Biden's and the DOJ's sacrificial lamb....

Riiiiiight. Like the first time his ass was nailed but walked due to a hung jury, mouth breather?

 

[Rambunctious]

Riiiiiight. Like the first time his ass was nailed but walked due to a hung jury, mouth breather?

Obama nailed him the first time because he wouldn't sign on to Obama's Iranian bailout.... so right on cue they go after him again.... he is a useful tool for Obama Obiden....

 

[jknowgood]

Another example of "If you talk long enough your lies are exposed". And Brian Kilmeade isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer in the first place.

• Hunter Biden's business partner: blows up in Republican's faces
• Burisma: blows up in Republican's faces
• Joseph Biden (God's choice) emails: blows up in Republican's faces
• Durham Report: blows up in Republican's faces
• Viktor Shokin: blows up in Republican's faces

The Republican case against Biden takes a body blow … from Fox News​

There are two central arguments in the Republican effort to impeach President Biden, neither validated.

The first is that Joe Biden benefited financially from his son Hunter’s business efforts — that Hunter Biden’s leveraging of his last name to generate consulting contracts trickled up to his father. Investigations by House Republicans, particularly the Oversight Committee led by Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) have failed to show any such connection, despite months of looking. Instead, this assertion relies on insinuations about Joe Biden making phone calls to his son — and depends on ignoring exculpatory evidence from Hunter Biden’s former business partner.

The other central attack on the president involves Hunter Biden’s work for the Ukrainian energy company Burisma. This relationship was adjudicated robustly during the first impeachment of President Donald Trump, a probe that centered on Trump’s desire to have the new Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, announce an investigation into the Bidens before the 2020 election.


Trumpworld’s belief that Joe Biden had sought the ouster of Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Viktor Shokin, to benefit Burisma and Hunter Biden was debunked in 2019. Perhaps in part because Fox News did its best to ignore the evidence in that impeachment inquiry, claims about the now-president trying to get Shokin fired back in 2015 and 2016 have been elevated again as though they retain validity.

They don’t — as Fox News unintentionally made clear over the weekend.

Kilmeade began by speaking with the former Ukrainian president — defeated by Zelensky in the country’s 2019 election — about the war in Russia. He then transitioned to the interview with Shokin, who’d referred to Poroshenko as his friend.

He played a clip from the Shokin interview in which the former prosecutor claimed that “Poroshenko fired me at the insistence of the then-vice-president Biden because I was investigating Burisma. … There were no complaints whatsoever, no problems with how I was performing at my job. But because pressure was repeatedly put on President Poroshenko, that is what ended up in him firing me.”

This is patently untrue, as has been established repeatedly. But Kilmeade presented it to Poroshenko as possible, asking if that is, in fact, why Shokin was fired.

“First of all, this is the completely crazy person,” Poroshenko began. “This is something wrong with him.”

“Second,” the nonnative English speaker continued, “there is no one single word of truth. And third, I hate the idea to make any comments and to make any intervention in the American election.” He asked that Kilmeade “not use such person like Shokin to undermine the trust between bipartisan support and Ukraine.”

“He’s not your friend?” Kilmeade asked.

“I don’t see him — maybe four years or something,” Poroshenko replied. “At all. And I hate the idea to have him because he play very dirty game, unfortunately.”

“Okay, so that is not true,” Kilmeade continued. “He didn’t get fired because of Joe Biden.” Poroshenko confirmed that he did not, saying that Shokin was fired “for his own statement.”

All they need is to start the impeachment and they can expose Biden's bank records.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

All they need is to start the impeachment and they can expose Biden's bank records.

They have been through them, jknowgood. You know that. You have no evidence.

 

[Synthaholic]

All they need is to start the impeachment and they can expose Biden's bank records.

Fuck that. Invasion of privacy. Charge him with a crime.

 

[jknowgood]

They have been through them, jknowgood. You know that. You have no evidence.

They have seen it, but they need the impeachment to make them public.

 

[jknowgood]

Fuck that. Invasion of privacy. Charge him with a crime.

Nope they cannot make his bank records public intil they start the impeachment.

 

[Synthaholic]

Nope they cannot make his bank records public intil they start the impeachment.

They cannot get them until there has been a criminal charge.

 

[Synthaholic]

I'm betting we don't see Republican calls for investigations into how Nimarata Haley got the money for this.

 

[lennypartiv]

They cannot get them until there has been a criminal charge.

They need to get his bank records first. Then they can prove there should be a criminal charge.

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[jknowgood]

They cannot get them until there has been a criminal charge.

They have seen them but they cannot make them public, until the impeachment. Everything they need is in them.

 

[Synthaholic]

They have seen them but they cannot make them public, until the impeachment. Everything they need is in them.

I do not know that this is true.

 

[jknowgood]

I do not know that this is true.

One senator lady interviewed said she saw his bank records but could give details. She did say she was surprised what was in it and that's the only reason they want to impeach is to make the records public. We will see.