Jonathan Price, unarmed black Texas man who was hailed as a “pillar of the community,” fatally shot by police officer as he tried to break up a fight

[pknopp]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

This should be breaking news right now— but it’s not.

Jonathan Price.

Say his name.

Family says Jonathan Price killed in Wolfe City officer-involved shooting while breaking up fight | FOX 4 Dallas-Fort Worth

The family of Jonathan Price says he was fatally shot during an officer-involved shooting in Wolfe City while he was breaking up a fight.

www.fox4news.com

Do what the cops tells you to do.. stop being ignorant

So do ALL whites do what the cops tell them to?

Nope...and that’s why many are DEAD ignorant fools.
This shit isn’t complicated...it goes like this...”follow Officer demands or risk dying”
Simple shit

Black Americans are killed at a much higher rate than White Americans

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/police-shootings-database/

because they commit crimes at higher rates--it's not rocket science
..in fact, they murder at 4 times the rate--so the rate by cops is LOWER

Same old right wing propaganda.

we know the truth and facts hurt you

I am waiting for you to post some.

 

[Redcurtain]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

Actually no you can be 17 and own that
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry

 

[pknopp]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

Actually no you can be 17 and own that
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry

Not in Wisconsin he can't.

 

[Redcurtain]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

Actually no you can be 17 and own that
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry

Not in Wisconsin he can't.

According to his gun rights lawyers it is.

 

[pknopp]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

Actually no you can be 17 and own that
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry

Not in Wisconsin he can't.

According to his gun rights lawyers it is.

He never said that.

 

[SavannahMann]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

Actually no you can be 17 and own that
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry

I didn’t see that. Do you?

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lc/information_memos/2018/im_2018_02

 

[Flash]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

I think your confusion continues.

You can if it is clear cut self defense. If you try to steal a candy bar and the store owner tries to kill you and you fight back that is sure as hell self defense. The fact that you commiting a crime by stealing the candy bar does not prevent you from protecting yourself aginst somebody from trying to murder you.

There is no proof that he was committing a crime by having the AR. A 17 year old can be in possession of a rifle according to Wisconsin law.

Same as here in Florida. A 17 year old can't buy a rifle or carry a concealed weapon but he can be in possession of a rifle or shotgun.

However, even if some fucked up jury decides that he had violated the law by having the rifle that is not murder.

The sonofabitches attacked him with the intent to do him harm and he fought back. Clear cut self defense.

The filthy ass woke AG was an asshole charging him.

His defense team will not only get him acquitted but also bring lawsuits against these vile despicable shitheads that have been slandering him.

Stop trying to defend the indefensible. You just look like a fool.

 

[Redcurtain]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

Actually no you can be 17 and own that
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry

Not in Wisconsin he can't.

According to his gun rights lawyers it is.

He never said that.

Yes he did

 

[Redcurtain]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

Actually no you can be 17 and own that
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry

I didn’t see that. Do you?

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lc/information_memos/2018/im_2018_02

CNSNews

www.cnsnews.com

 

[basquebromance]

Justice...for all or for some?

Let’s talk about that. Because the reality is that the life of a Black person in America has never been treated as fully human. And america has yet to fulfill that promise of equal justice under law

 

[pknopp]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

I think your confusion continues.

You can if it is clear cut self defense. If you try to steal a candy bar and the store owner tries to kill you and you fight back that is sure as hell self defense. The fact that you commiting a crime by stealing the candy bar does not prevent you from protecting yourself aginst somebody from trying to murder you.

There is no proof that he was committing a crime by having the AR. A 17 year old can be in possession of a rifle according to Wisconsin law.

Same as here in Florida. A 17 year old can't buy a rifle or carry a concealed weapon but he can be in possession of a rifle or shotgun.

However, even if some fucked up jury decides that he had violated the law by having the rifle that is not murder.

The sonofabitches attacked him with the intent to do him harm and he fought back. Clear cut self defense.

The filthy ass woke AG was an asshole charging him.

His defense team will not only get him acquitted but also bring lawsuits against these vile despicable shitheads that have been slandering him.

Stop trying to defend the indefensible. You just look like a fool.

LOL........I'm not the one ignoring the actual law presented to you and just making up what I want it to be.

 

[pknopp]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

Actually no you can be 17 and own that
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry

I didn’t see that. Do you?

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lc/information_memos/2018/im_2018_02

CNSNews

www.cnsnews.com

If it was legal there is nothing to argue concerning the law being unconstitutuonal.

 

[Redcurtain]

Justice...for all or for some?

Let’s talk about that. Because the reality is that the life of a Black person in America has never been treated as fully human. And america has yet to fulfill that promise of equal justice under law

Who’s not equal?

 

[Redcurtain]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

Actually no you can be 17 and own that
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry

I didn’t see that. Do you?

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lc/information_memos/2018/im_2018_02

CNSNews

www.cnsnews.com

If it was legal there is nothing to argue concerning the law being unconstitutuonal.

You can indict a ham sandwich lol
Title 10 Section 246 of United States Code renders that charge in any ordinance, that that charge will be based on blatantly unconstitutional under these circumstances

 

[pknopp]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

Actually no you can be 17 and own that
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry

I didn’t see that. Do you?

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lc/information_memos/2018/im_2018_02

CNSNews

www.cnsnews.com

If it was legal there is nothing to argue concerning the law being unconstitutuonal.

You can indict a ham sandwich lol
Title 10 Section 246 of United States Code renders that charge in any ordinance, that that charge will be based on blatantly unconstitutional under these circumstances

United States v. Rene E ruled that states can restrict the gun ownership of minors.

 

[Redcurtain]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

Actually no you can be 17 and own that
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry

I didn’t see that. Do you?

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lc/information_memos/2018/im_2018_02

CNSNews

www.cnsnews.com

If it was legal there is nothing to argue concerning the law being unconstitutuonal.

You can indict a ham sandwich lol
Title 10 Section 246 of United States Code renders that charge in any ordinance, that that charge will be based on blatantly unconstitutional under these circumstances

United States v. Rene E ruled that states can restrict the gun ownership of minors.

Well he wasn’t in that state lol

 

[SavannahMann]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

Actually no you can be 17 and own that
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry

I didn’t see that. Do you?

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lc/information_memos/2018/im_2018_02

CNSNews

www.cnsnews.com

That is going to be decided by the courts. Now help me out here. When a cop shoots someone and the Grand Jury declines to indict that is justice. When the grand jury indicts that is political witch hunt. If someone is caught by police they are suppose to tell it to the judge. Unless that is a white person, then no judge is needed. Will you all make up your damned minds?

 

[Redcurtain]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

Actually no you can be 17 and own that
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry

I didn’t see that. Do you?

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lc/information_memos/2018/im_2018_02

CNSNews

www.cnsnews.com

That is going to be decided by the courts. Now help me out here. When a cop shoots someone and the Grand Jury declines to indict that is justice. When the grand jury indicts that is political witch hunt. If someone is caught by police they are suppose to tell it to the judge. Unless that is a white person, then no judge is needed. Will you all make up your damned minds?

Yup tards keep lynching republicans who defend them selves from black animals,, and wasting money. We will all be out soon, like Zimmerman locked and loaded

 

[SavannahMann]

Rittenhouse was in a similar situation. He was in illegal possession of a rifle. The law says not under 18. He was 17. Nobody wrote the law after the fact. Nobody passed a special law just for Kyle. So he was committing a crime when the shooting happened. Again.

You may be a little confused on that.

The Wisconsin law says that someone under 18 can have possession of a rifle or shotgun. They can't have concealed carry or get a permit to buy a firearm but there is no law against a 17 being in possession of a rifle.

However, if he is guilty of illegally carrying a firearm at his age that has nothing to do with the murder charges against him. It was a clear case of self defense.

You can not claim self defense while committing a crime. Possession of a gun for anyone under 18 is illegal unless being used for target practice, hunting or a member of the armed forces in Wisconsin.

Actually no you can be 17 and own that
Rifle for hunting, and him
Owning it means he could bring it to a open carry state, and he was attacked and used it. Sorry

I didn’t see that. Do you?

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lc/information_memos/2018/im_2018_02

CNSNews

www.cnsnews.com

That is going to be decided by the courts. Now help me out here. When a cop shoots someone and the Grand Jury declines to indict that is justice. When the grand jury indicts that is political witch hunt. If someone is caught by police they are suppose to tell it to the judge. Unless that is a white person, then no judge is needed. Will you all make up your damned minds?

Yup tards keep lynching republicans who defend them selves from black animals,, and wasting money. We will all be out soon, like Zimmerman locked and loaded

And people wonder why I am not voting this year. Both sides have fallen to extremist idiots who have no business being in charge of City Sanitation much less the Country.