*John Roberts Stay In A Courtroom, Not In Trumps Business!*

"FIVE anti Trump judges are involved in a secretive, INVITE ONLY club for judges and lawyers called the American Inns of Court. Even the membership and meetings are secret. But somehow the DOJ has shown up at meetings. At least since Biden had been in office.

Is hobnobbing with the DOJ in court matters acceptable? Let alone meeting in secret?

So who all is linked to this selective and secretive club? And recall all of their negative Trump rulings?

  • Judge James Boasberg (President)
  • Scotus Ketanji Brown Jackson (Vice President)
  • Judge Amit Mehta (Secretary and a meeting held at her court.)
  • Judge Beryl Howell
Justice (Professionalism Award)
-Justice John Roberts (Honorary Bencher of the Middle Temple)"



If this is true, why is Roberts an honorary member? How can he rule on the ruling of his radical progressive buddies?
Sorry but this is just conspiracy theory shit...

By the way if they meet? So what... they all work in the legal profession and probably known each other for decades...

Also, What is the Federal Society? Is that a society that gets Conservative Judges elected?
 
Sorry but this is just conspiracy theory shit...

By the way if they meet? So what... they all work in the legal profession and probably known each other for decades...

Also, What is the Federal Society? Is that a society that gets Conservative Judges elected?
It's a twitter bot.
 
Sorry but this is just conspiracy theory shit...

By the way if they meet? So what... they all work in the legal profession and probably known each other for decades...

Also, What is the Federal Society? Is that a society that gets Conservative Judges elected?
Like their beloved orange deity, anything that doesn't go their way MUST have been rigged against them by bad guys.

It's one of the traits they share. They validate each other.
 
Sorry bout that,

1. These judges need to back off, wait till it comes in your docket to weigh the case.
2. All these judges need to sit back and wait, no you must not try to stop the President, sit down and shut up till its time to judge a case.
3. You have your assigned jobs, now get to it!!!!


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

What are you sorry about exactly? You seem to think that judges should rule against the law and the Constitution because King Donald said so.

The Gateway Pundit isn't a source. It's garbage produce out of the imagination of some right wing nut, produced in his basement office in Washington.
 
Sorry bout that,

1. These judges need to back off, wait till it comes in your docket to weigh the case.
2. All these judges need to sit back and wait, no you must not try to stop the President, sit down and shut up till its time to judge a case.
3. You have your assigned jobs, now get to it!!!!


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
~~~~~~
Wow! is that like a 'Star Chamber'?
 
Sorry bout that,

1. These judges need to back off, wait till it comes in your docket to weigh the case.
2. All these judges need to sit back and wait, no you must not try to stop the President, sit down and shut up till its time to judge a case.
3. You have your assigned jobs, now get to it!!!!


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
How accurate do you think a page that hasn't updated Jackson's status as being on the Supreme Court?

Also, did you notice some of the other officers of the club are not judges but members of law firms?
 
Last edited:
Schumer straight up bragged that Dems put partisan judges in place to shit on the Constitution and stop Trump.

NEVER FORGET…..DEMS CARE ABOUT TRENDING DE ARAGUA…..NOT THE USA.

Pubs need to run on that in the midterms.

BUT THERE WILL NEVER BE ANY MORE ELECTIONS BECAUSE TRUMP WON! 🤡 Isnt that right, you lying POS
lefties.
 
Schumer straight up bragged that Dems put partisan judges in place to shit on the Constitution and stop Trump.

NEVER FORGET…..DEMS CARE ABOUT TRENDING DE ARAGUA…..NOT THE USA.

Pubs need to run on that in the midterms.

BUT THERE WILL NEVER BE ANY MORE ELECTIONS BECAUSE TRUMP WON! 🤡 Isnt that right, you lying POS
lefties.
I am sure they are trending, but that is not their name.
 
Sorry bout that,

1. These judges need to back off, wait till it comes in your docket to weigh the case.
2. All these judges need to sit back and wait, no you must not try to stop the President, sit down and shut up till its time to judge a case.
3. You have your assigned jobs, now get to it!!!!


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
I don't know that Justice Roberts is corrupt and I'll need more than a Gateway Pundit expose' to come to an opinion on that.

But if a judge's behavior is shown to be corrupt beyond reasonable doubt, we seriously need to elect a GOP super majority in the House and Senate and start prying them out of the federal courts including SCOTUS if in fact there are any there.
 
Why do conservatives tend to grasp at straws to dispute liberal intent? This is a nothing burger and all you accomplish is embarrassing yourselves in your incompetent tactics. If find it disconcerting when I agree with the libs on a thread because you grasp anything that might make another conservative look bad and then proceed to prove your own incompetence.

Did the critics of Roberts not read this thread?
 
Roberts has been questionable since "Obamacare aka ACA"

He's erratic
 
Schumer straight up bragged that Dems put partisan judges in place to shit on the Constitution and stop Trump.

NEVER FORGET…..DEMS CARE ABOUT TRENDING DE ARAGUA…..NOT THE USA.

Pubs need to run on that in the midterms.

BUT THERE WILL NEVER BE ANY MORE ELECTIONS BECAUSE TRUMP WON! 🤡 Isnt that right, you lying POS
lefties.
Tren de aragua.

Stupid autocorrect.
 
Sorry bout that,

1. These judges need to back off, wait till it comes in your docket to weigh the case.
2. All these judges need to sit back and wait, no you must not try to stop the President, sit down and shut up till its time to judge a case.
3. You have your assigned jobs, now get to it!!!!


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Nope. The Court is there to keep a lid on overzealous government. Constitution limits on government power are vital.
 
Roberts has been questionable since "Obamacare aka ACA"

He's erratic
He's been spineless, for sure. Most egregiously, his copout on ACA, but ... people change. Maybe he's growing a pair.
 
Last edited:
Sorry bout that,

1. Here is more garbage on Roberts.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Sorry bout that,

1. Here is more garbage on Roberts.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Just an observation, but gatewaypundit never fails to entertain! Batshit insane!
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom