Chief Justice Roberts Linked to Secret Invite Only Club – You Won’t Believe Who Else Is In!

You keep thinking that people like Trump and Bush are big fans of actual Conservatives


Without IDing one single thing W ever did that actually was conservative.... we're still waiting for one...
 
It would be absolutely shocking if Pam Bondi wasn't also a "member."
 
It looks like the swamp isn’t just alive and well—it’s wearing black robes and holding gavels.

Investigative journalist Bad Kitty Unleashed just dropped a stunning report that Chief Justice John Roberts is involved with a secretive, invite-only judicial group called the American Inns of Court, specifically the D.C.-based Edward Bennett Williams Inn of Court.

This isn’t just a social club—it’s a who’s who of anti-Trump activist judges, including James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Let’s put this in perspective: Just two days ago, Roberts publicly scolded President Trump for demanding the impeachment of activist judges like Boasberg. And now we learn Roberts is socializing behind closed doors with these same judges in what appears to be a judicial old boys’ club masquerading as a professional organization?

Nothing shady about that at all.


BJ-

We knew that Roberts was a lost cause when he changed the wording of The Affordable Care Act to suit his needs.
Bush's biggest mistake, long term.
Meanwhile Clarence Thomas is reading this post on a Yacht he was flown to in a jet all owned by a right wing advocate of his rulings. Good one!
 
It looks like the swamp isn’t just alive and well—it’s wearing black robes and holding gavels.

Investigative journalist Bad Kitty Unleashed just dropped a stunning report that Chief Justice John Roberts is involved with a secretive, invite-only judicial group called the American Inns of Court, specifically the D.C.-based Edward Bennett Williams Inn of Court.

This isn’t just a social club—it’s a who’s who of anti-Trump activist judges, including James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Let’s put this in perspective: Just two days ago, Roberts publicly scolded President Trump for demanding the impeachment of activist judges like Boasberg. And now we learn Roberts is socializing behind closed doors with these same judges in what appears to be a judicial old boys’ club masquerading as a professional organization?

Nothing shady about that at all.


BJ-

We knew that Roberts was a lost cause when he changed the wording of The Affordable Care Act to suit his needs.
Bush's biggest mistake, long term.
To be honest, it looks like a smear campaign to me. Roberts has decided many things in Trump's favor, in fact, most things.
 
The Dobbs decision was so poorly managed and decided.

That was the final straw for me.
 
For some reason when we put people on the Supreme Court it is not like how the Progressives do it. They just keep putting justices in that move further and further left. We seem to have moles at times. And that means the politicians that front these people know this going in.
Jackson is a perfect example. She's so far left there have been serveral cases where she has been the lone vote, not even agreeing with the liberal justices. Makes you wonder if she even went to law school.
 
He should not be socializing after hours with any Trump haters . Their zealous witch hunting of Trump is biased . The story is sourced and the organization exists snd he’s a member so be prepared for a bombardment of liberal deflection to get this off the front pages of reality
 
I have to get my wife to an appointment, so no time for a detailed response.

Let's just say this ******* SCOTUS ended up passing a ruling that left "personhood" (an inherent aspect of being a human being) up to being determined State by State and varying State by State.

The same bunch of retards that decided that a legal construct like "marriage" can not Constitutionally vary State by State in the same way.

Gay marriage is a Constitutional right, but basic human rights and personhood?

Not so ******* much?

Make it make sense.
 
I have to get my wife to an appointment, so no time for a detailed response.

Let's just say this ******* SCOTUS ended up passing a ruling that left "personhood" (an inherent aspect of being a human being) up to being determined State by State and varying State by State.

The same bunch of retards that decided that a legal construct like "marriage" can not Constitutionally vary State by State in the same way.

Gay marriage is a Constitutional right, but basic human rights and personhood?

Not so ******* much?

Make it make sense.

Okay
Thanks
 
No that is merely an opinion piece with a picture of Thomas boating and the lunatic editorialist concocted that his visit is corrupt
As I stated earlier the children will be rolling out their patented “somebody else did something too” in their desperate deflection and distraction attempts from Roberts condemnable secret affiliation
Stay vigilant thinking responders!
 
Last edited:
In a select secret club of active TDS rogues. Hardly fitting for the chief
 
15th post
i-KdFndcJ-M.jpg


"My fellow Americans; let me assure you my choice of John Roberts for the Supreme Court will once again undermine the Constitution in exchange for his need for friendship and status in some weird leftist social club. You have my word on that."
 
Back
Top Bottom