Joe Biden's Covid death toll passes 400,000

[billyerock123]

this is how stupid Republicans are... The House and Senate sergeants-at-arms, who are nominated by each chamber’s leader and elected by chamber members, serve as the Capitol’s chief law enforcement officers for their respective chambers. Each makes decisions for the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the Capitol’s police force in concert with several House and Senate committees, including one on which Davis sits.

The House sergeant-at-arms reports to the House speaker just as the Senate sergeant-at-arms reports to the Senate majority leader, but there is no indication Pelosi controls day-to-day security operations. So we reached out to Davis’ office to ask what he was talking about.

The House sergeant-at-arms reports to the House speaker just as the Senate sergeant-at-arms reports to the Senate majority leader, but there is no indication Pelosi controls day-to-day security operations. So we reached out to Davis’ office to ask what he was talking about.


Citing a Feb. 1 letter from Sund to Pelosi, Davis spokesman Aaron DeGroot responded in an email that the former police chief “alone could not request National Guard support because he ‘had no authority to do so without an Emergency Declaration by the Capitol Police Board.’ Requesting National Guard support is a major security decision, and it’s one that even the Speaker’s office admits they were involved in.”


That description is accurate. According to a bipartisan Senate report on the Jan. 6 attack, the Capitol police chief “has no unilateral authority to request assistance from the National Guard” and “must submit a request for assistance to the Capitol Police Board for approval.” Likewise, as DeGroot noted, Pelosi’s office has said Irving did request the speaker’s permission to call on the National Guard.


However, those facts do not prove Pelosi made all the calls on how Sund, Irving, and the other members of the Capitol Police Board responded to the crisis — most notably because then-Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger, who reported to then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell at the time, also played an active role.


As Sund noted in his letter to Pelosi, the police chief “notified the two Sergeant at Arms” around 1 p.m. on Jan. 6 that he “urgently needed support.” Despite confusion over the statutory process for requesting National Guard assistance, both Irving and Stenger eventually approved Sund’s request to call for backup at 2:10 p.m., according to the Senate report.


Prior to that approval being granted, the New York Times reported, aides to both congressional leaders “were perplexed to learn that the two sergeants-at-arms had not yet approved the request for troops, according to spokesmen for Mr. McConnell and Ms. Pelosi.”

“The speaker expects security professionals to make security decisions and to be informed of those decisions,” Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill told the Times.

Our ruling​

Davis said “we know that the speaker’s office was calling the shots on all of” the actions taken by the officials in charge of Capitol security on Jan. 6.


As evidence, his office highlighted the fact that then-House Sergeant-at-Arms Irving requested approval from Pelosi before greenlighting the Capitol police chief’s request to call in the National Guard.


But Davis and his spokesman ignored a critical detail: the decision to approve that request and call for backup was not Irving’s call alone. It was made in conjunction with the Senate sergeant-at-arms, who reports to the Senate majority leader. At the time, that was McConnell.


those are the facts

do you think they will get it ???? i don't

 

[JohnDB]

2 charts show COVID-19 booster shots' superior protection compared to double vaccination

Well...longer term data is coming out.

 

[billyerock123]

yes a guilty plea will more then likely end up in a conviction.

But he took a plea, he was not adjudicated guilty...that happens often as well. Because the Court delayed the hearing to get a presentence report, and the DOJ wanted or thought they could use him for other stuff...that was delayed....during that time frame he moved to withdraw his plea, and got new attorneys, and the Brady evidence was turned over

He was never convicted....please if you think he was provide us with the transcript where he was found guilty.

This really isn't hard to grasp....if you are willing to accept reality.

do you realie how big of a fool you are ????? you're showing here your ignoerance is outstanding ... you try to tap dance around everything .... just so you are looking right ... no matter how wrong you are and you are wrong here, you keep with trump lies ...

 

[Faun]

He was found guilty when he pleaded guilty.

Flynn pleads guilty to lying to the FBI

The charge brings the criminal case into the Trump White House and raises questions about who else in the administration Mueller could be eyeing.

www.politico.com

The guilty plea, accepted by a federal court in Washington Friday morning...​

He was never convicted....please if you think he was provide us with the transcript where he was found guilty.

<crickets>

 

[struth]

nobody from the state said the election was rigged period ...they all said, not some, but all of them said the election was not rigged and they had no evidence it was ... what you are doing here is lying to save face ... right now we are finding out that Trump and his administration were going out to the states and filing to the state forged documents say they were electoral votes from all those states ... they were forged documents ... sign by republicans ...the AG barr said there was no evidence ... he became aware they were going to start taking voting machines offline ... each and every day we are finding what trump was doing by trying to take over the government ... I can't wait for the house to start airing the January 6 hearings in primetime where we all will see how Trump was trying to turn this government into an oligarchy ... you don't realize how close we came to be a communist country ...if pence said the election was a fraud and all these forged documents started showing up we all would lose our freedoms ...

nah a PA court said the way the election was run was illegal

you don’t keep up with current events?

 

[struth]

do you realie how big of a fool you are ????? you're showing here your ignoerance is outstanding ... you try to tap dance around everything .... just so you are looking right ... no matter how wrong you are and you are wrong here, you keep with trump lies ...

i am not tapping around anything just starting the facts

 

[billyerock123]

nah a PA court said the way the election was run was illegal

you don’t keep up with current events?

No they didn’t prove your accusation … nobody ever claimed it was run illegally
In the days since President Donald Trump lost his bid for reelection, he has relentlessly and falsely attacked the result in Pennsylvania and other battleground states as the product of widespread fraud. His assaults culminated last week in a 46-minute videotaped screed full of demonstrable falsehoods.

Politicians routinely exaggerate or misrepresent the facts, but never before has an American president refused as Trump has to accept the unambiguous result of a free and fair election.

Representatives from the Trump campaign have spouted fiery rhetoric about electoral fraud on a grand scale. But in courts of law, where proof is required and where there are penalties for lying, they haven’t provided evidenceor alleged that even one vote in Pennsylvania was deliberately cast illegally. Rather, their legal efforts have been aimed at disqualifying votes that all evidence shows were legitimately cast under rules they disagree with.


As Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, said in dismissing one campaign challenge last month: “Calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

Below, we’ve gathered and debunked some of the most prominent false claims about Pennsylvania’s presidential election leveled in recent weeks by Trump and his allies.
Touareg lying your ass off to save face … stop your lying…

They are finding Biden votes all over the place — in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So bad for our Country!”​

Trump, in a tweet on Nov. 4, 2020​

On election night, Trump appeared to have a strong “lead” in Pennsylvania, and he expressed confidence he would win the state. He even wrongly “claimed” Pennsylvania’s Electoral College votes in a tweet before the race had been decided. But in the days ahead, as more mail ballots were processed and counted, Joe Biden pulled ahead and ultimately won the state by 81,000 votes, or about 1%.

The slow counting of mail ballots, and the way it eroded Trump’s early advantage, was the direct and expected result of Pennsylvania’s election rules — not fraud.

 

[billyerock123]

i am not tapping around anything just starting the facts

you have stated one fact to date, period ... you quote google or some blogger or some conspiracy theorist you don't know a true fact if you read one ... ...I've shown that for sure ... omer than once give us one of your so-called facts and I will show you where it came from ... if it's a true statement or not backed up by What ??? actual facts ... something you know nothing about ...

 

[billyerock123]

you have stated one fact to date, period ... you quote google or some blogger or some conspiracy theorist you don't know a true fact if you read one ... ...I've shown that for sure ... omer than once give us one of your so-called facts and I will show you where it came from ... if it's a true statement or not backed up by What ??? actual facts ... something you know nothing about ...

haha no the dems were trying to toss thousands of absentee ballots…military ballots

the dems also wanted to recount a certain county a different way then the rest of the state.

your knowledge or lack there of, is showing

do you ever stop posting conspiracy theorists you realize how stupid you look ... none of what you said was true ... give it up

 

[billyerock123]

i mean it’s a free country…so long as its legal folks can do what they want…

if they work for the executive branch then they can. only do what the president allows…if he doesn’t want someone prosecuted the doj won’t prosecute them for example.

you get dumber and dumber ...

 

[billyerock123]

i am not tapping around anything just starting the facts

yeah you are ...

 

[billyerock123]

here ya go Struth the web sid that HAS MICKAEL FLYNN CONVICTION read it a weep you'll find how stupid you are ...

https://www.justice.gov/file/1015126/download

 

[struth]

yeah you are ...

glad we finally agree

 

[j-mac]

No they didn’t prove your accusation … nobody ever claimed it was run illegally
In the days since President Donald Trump lost his bid for reelection, he has relentlessly and falsely attacked the result in Pennsylvania and other battleground states as the product of widespread fraud. His assaults culminated last week in a 46-minute videotaped screed full of demonstrable falsehoods.

Politicians routinely exaggerate or misrepresent the facts, but never before has an American president refused as Trump has to accept the unambiguous result of a free and fair election.

Representatives from the Trump campaign have spouted fiery rhetoric about electoral fraud on a grand scale. But in courts of law, where proof is required and where there are penalties for lying, they haven’t provided evidenceor alleged that even one vote in Pennsylvania was deliberately cast illegally. Rather, their legal efforts have been aimed at disqualifying votes that all evidence shows were legitimately cast under rules they disagree with.


As Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, said in dismissing one campaign challenge last month: “Calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

Below, we’ve gathered and debunked some of the most prominent false claims about Pennsylvania’s presidential election leveled in recent weeks by Trump and his allies.
Touareg lying your ass off to save face … stop your lying…

They are finding Biden votes all over the place — in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So bad for our Country!”​

Trump, in a tweet on Nov. 4, 2020​

On election night, Trump appeared to have a strong “lead” in Pennsylvania, and he expressed confidence he would win the state. He even wrongly “claimed” Pennsylvania’s Electoral College votes in a tweet before the race had been decided. But in the days ahead, as more mail ballots were processed and counted, Joe Biden pulled ahead and ultimately won the state by 81,000 votes, or about 1%.

The slow counting of mail ballots, and the way it eroded Trump’s early advantage, was the direct and expected result of Pennsylvania’s election rules — not fraud.

Rules that were put in place illegally against PA constitution

 

[struth]

here ya go Struth the web sid that HAS MICKAEL FLYNN CONVICTION read it a weep you'll find how stupid you are ...

https://www.justice.gov/file/1015126/download

that isn’t a Court Order of conviction

It was a statement drafted by he mueller team, signed, flynn later and before conviction pulled his plea and the doj moved to dismiss, after the court forced the mueller team to release Brady evidence they had been hiding

geez man…this is common knowledge

 

[billyerock123]

that isn’t a Court Order of conviction

It was a statement drafted by he mueller team, signed, flynn later and before conviction pulled his plea and the doj moved to dismiss, after the court forced the mueller team to release Brady evidence they had been hiding

geez man…this is common knowledge

among conspiracy theorist you are quoting conspiracy theorist not I gave you the actual court documents where he was convicted waiting for his sentence ... thats when trump free him ... you can play your games but court documents say he was guilty traitor ... here you are supporting to a traitor ...

 

[struth]

among conspiracy theorist you are quoting conspiracy theorist not I gave you the actual court documents where he was convicted waiting for his sentence ... thats when trump free him ... you can play your games but court documents say he was guilty traitor ... here you are supporting to a traitor ...

Nah, it's not a conspiracy...it's real facts...like the fact your link isn't to a conviction or sentencing order...

and here is the actual Motion to Dismiss from the DOJ...laying out the facts and law for you: READ: DOJ motion to dismiss Flynn case

 

[billyerock123]

Rules that were put in place illegally against PA constitution

no it wasn't against their constitution and they weren't illegal ... all they did was allow mail-in ballots and drop boxes to be placed theres nothing illegal about that at all
Election law experts said that even if Hawley were right about the law violating the state constitution, which is debatable, it still wouldn’t be the role of the U.S. Congress to fix it.

When Hawley defended his decision to challenge Pennsylvania’s electoral vote, University of Texas law professor Stephen Vladeck tweeted: "In other words, @HawleyMO’s main gripe is that the (Republican-led) Pennsylvania legislature violated the *Pennsylvania* Constitution when it expanded mail-in voting in 2019. 1. That’s not fraud. 2. That’s a question for the *Pennsylvania* Supreme Court to decide — and it passed."

Vladeck told us in an email that it is factually correct that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has never ruled on whether Act 77 is consistent with the Pennsylvania Constitution — the court threw out the challenge as untimely.

But to suggest that it’s Congress’s role to intervene in the question of state constitutionality is wrong. what you are saying is sour grapes on your part ... finally the voters were allowed to vote ....didn't have to deal with all the crap republicans do to trick the voter out of voting and you can't stand that fact ... they were all allow to vote republicans democrats independents were allowed to vote and you republicans lost and you can't stand the fact that the people ruled not your republican interference mongrels ....

 

[billyerock123]

that isn’t a Court Order of conviction

It was a statement drafted by he mueller team, signed, flynn later and before conviction pulled his plea and the doj moved to dismiss, after the court forced the mueller team to release Brady evidence they had been hiding

geez man…this is common knowledge

the if he wasn't convicted as you say, then why did Trump give him a pardon when he was on his way to jail
Geez mam- this is common knowledge he was pardon ... why did he pardon him come on get the old tap shoes out a dance around that one we know you will

 

[billyerock123]

Nah, it's not a conspiracy...it's real facts...like the fact your link isn't to a conviction or sentencing order...

and here is the actual Motion to Dismiss from the DOJ...laying out the facts and law for you: READ: DOJ motion to dismiss Flynn case

it was refused to dismiss you moron ... he was on his way to prison orange jump suit and all ...